Rhythmone Share Discussion Threads

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 14/6/2017 12:08

Alex, thanks Vietnam looks interesting. Also worth looking at a cryptocurrency called Ethereum. It's an alternative to bitcoin and seems to be on the up. Tread carefully though, can be volatile.

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 14/6/2017 12:06

What's the consensus on r1 then chaps?

[sikhthetech] 14/6/2017 10:57

Google's still trying to get some 'high-profile' brands back after YouTube ad crisis

Johnson & Johnson, AT&T and JPMorgan pulled back on ad spending.
Google has been putting in place greater controls for marketers.
"There are still occasional events."

[geheimnis2] 13/6/2017 20:31

Yep. Most of those successful entrepreneurs spend their time trolling bbs blaming others for their bad investment decisions.

Just like hotpants lives a happy and fulfilled life

Mmmmm....yeah

Lol!

As you were

G2 x

[sikhthetech] 13/6/2017 19:46

Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer Resigns as Verizon Officially Acquires the Company

As of today, it's finally part of the telecom giant

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 13/6/2017 18:54

Yes, running your business and being extremely successful usually makes people angry, eh? ... ... ...

[football] 13/6/2017 18:45

Does RhythmOne plc’s (AIM:RTHM) Low Debt-Load Make It Financially Strong?

[football] 13/6/2017 18:13

I think they need a Ad Anger Blocker on that thread

[sikhthetech] 13/6/2017 17:51

Google, Apple Browser Updates Could Spell Changes for Online Ads


The updates include a built-in ad blocker to target "annoying, intrusive ads," as well as changes to data collection and tracking capabilities.

[stocky] 13/6/2017 17:34

There is so much anger on the hoodwinkers thread. Anger management needed. So sad! So sad!

[jarvis4] 13/6/2017 17:15

Another day of apparently relentless selling whilst the share price marks time.

[jwoolley] 13/6/2017 16:52

Lol....respond like what 1gw?? You are one strange fella but also predictable with that response.

I will just leave it with me still thinking you are extremely naive and probably a tad over sensitive because you are currently running at a loss with your holding.

Maybe that's because you don't understand accounting....

Definition of naive, anyone?

[1gw] 13/6/2017 16:29

So you (jwoolley) think I'm sensitive because I include an "out of your depth" comment in my post replying to you? And yet you respond like that.

Definition of ironic, anyone?

[sikhthetech] 13/6/2017 16:25

1gw, you make a lot of assumptions about posters and make them seem like fact...

you should stick to analyses of rns and accounts - something you are good at and present your side of it.. and accept that other people do have opinions which may not agree with yours... you're not always right, believe it or not...

[1gw] 13/6/2017 16:19

which, not for the first time in your posts STT, is a completely different point to the one I was making.

I fully agree with your post 4307 and have raised the point in public with the board of R1 at the last AGM.

Might we be honoured with your presence at this year's AGM?

[sikhthetech] 13/6/2017 16:17

the fact is 1R have a history of making acquisitions, integrating and then writing them off...
you don't need to be an accountant to see that...

[1gw] 13/6/2017 16:15

Perhaps jwoolley you could think about investing some of those huge profits in anger management classes as well as in a beginners course in accounting for acquisitions as a public company?

And stt, I think you'll find my "out of your depth" comment was merely responding in kind (and fairly gently in comparison) to the last paragraph of jwoolley's post 4301.

[sikhthetech] 13/6/2017 16:12

lol...
jw,
I've also previously said 1gw is v naive and makes a lot of assumptions about posters...

his comment saying it's 'out of your depth' is a typical goading comment the so called family would make....

[geheimnis2] 13/6/2017 15:54

lol...fluffy is going wild over on the hoodwinker thread

claiming to be a self made business man...


lol....

[1gw] 13/6/2017 15:35

or perhaps, more realistically, a little out of your depth when it comes to accounting for acquisitions?

[1gw] 13/6/2017 15:27

So share with us how you would account for an acquisition like Perk then? You could do it without acquisition costs and exceptional costs could you? You could then manage not to have any goodwill or intangibles? You must be quite a magician.

[1gw] 13/6/2017 14:37

jwoolley - well if they don't make any acquisitions this year, and they can do $15m adjusted EBITDA or so (as per "consensus"), then it looks to me like they're in with a shot at a bottom-line profit. That comes from just looking at the FY17 EBITDA bridge and thinking about how the different elements might change.

So no smoke and mirrors there - it's fairly transparent isn't it?

On the other hand if they see a chance for faster growth by acquisition, that will necessarily come with some implications for acquisition & exceptional costs and will almost certainly add to goodwill and intangibles. You can call that smoke and mirrors if you like, but it's fairly standard accounting, isn't it?