Rhythmone Share Discussion Threads

[leluot3] 30/3/2017 11:55

Geheimnis2
29 Mar '17 - 21:54 - 5707 of 5708 1 0

Do try to get out more, loops

Sorry Gimpy - rooted here awaiting your informative comments -

Hows the bath tub this morning?


Looks like another red red day. I can see 25p on Barkys horizon.

Perhaps 25p was the royal flush after all!

Just a thought

[sikhthetech] 30/3/2017 11:24

Ad tech firms are using Google’s ad scandal to sell their own products


"David Lee, programmatic lead at The Richards Group, said that over the past two weeks, he has received “at least 10 pitches” from various ad tech vendors who lead their pitch with stories about brands pulling out of YouTube before delving into the product they’re selling. For comparison sake, a few months ago, Lee got two to three pitches about brand safety every few weeks. "

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 30/3/2017 08:19

Find it strange that when tosca want to buy there's suddenly a mass of volume followed by an rns. I.e. Available shares. When they aren't buying there's barely any shares traded at all.

[geheimnis2] 29/3/2017 21:54

Do try to get out more, loops

Lol!

[leluot3] 29/3/2017 21:45

BARKBOO
28 Mar '17 - 15:29 - 5697 of 5705 3 0

Loopy Loopy nuts are we - share price now at 43p


Cant you and those fairies get anything right!

I see the gimpmeister has a new name for his tin bath - its called Caribbean!

[geheimnis2] 29/3/2017 21:39

Hairdressers are very confident.

[sikhthetech] 29/3/2017 19:05

Tons of unnecessary ad calls going out’: Confessions of a beleaguered ad tech exec

[barkboo] 29/3/2017 14:52

Yes - I can see a little bit of excitement this afternoon, and an rns tomorrow morning. Just a scaffolder guess.

[sikhthetech] 29/3/2017 14:36

The Guardian is suing ad tech company Rubicon Project

so we had Methbot, P&G demands for clarity, Google's problems and now Guardian is suing Rubicon Project...

Publishers/advertisers are certainly beginning to make a stand, aren't they..

More reputation issues for ad tech... will this lead to other publishers demanding clearer pricing and bring the amount ad exchanges take as their cut under scrutiny...


"no matter what the outcome, the legal dispute will likely shed more light on the complicated nature of the online ad buying ecosystem."

[midasx] 29/3/2017 13:49

Year end at the weekend. Trading update soon after, what are the results going to look like?

Traditionally quietest quarter, integration costs for Perk?

They did say the acquisition would be accretive for full year 2018, but what about this year? Possibly the accountants can make use of some tax advantage due to Perks previous losses.

A hard one to guess, but the Brokers seem confident!

[geheimnis2] 29/3/2017 13:04

Wow! anyone seen the news? apparently the UK is leaving the EU!

lol...spent so much time surfing in the caribbean lately i must have missed it!

[sikhthetech] 29/3/2017 12:24

YouTube’s advertiser boycott probably won’t dent Google’s empire

google could lose around $750m out of $73bln forecast revenue or 1%...

"More than 250 brands have reportedly frozen their (non-search) ad campaigns with Google, including the likes of AT&T, Verizon, Dish Network, PepsiCo, and others in the US and abroad."

"According to analysts at Nomura Instinet, the total revenue loss could reach up to $750 million"

[nickb] 29/3/2017 10:48

That's a good read

[football] 28/3/2017 20:51

A Tale of Two Header Bidders: Client vs. Server-to-Server

ShareMARCH 28, 2017
by Nilesh Dhawale

In a previous blog, I shared the top three ways publishers can get the most out of their header bidder. These tips highlighted the importance of working with a partner with the lowest response times and timeout rates, has direct access to demand, and can represent your supply. In this blog, I want to focus on the first – speed and efficiency – and introduce the rationale for server-to-server header bidding.

Before diving into what server-to-server header bidding is, let’s review how traditional header bidding works. For most publishers, the auction in header bidding happens in the client (browser). Bids are requested concurrently from demand partners (bidders). Since the browser limits the number of simultaneous concurrent tasks, it limits the number of bidders that can be added to the auction. It looks like this:

So how can a publisher increase speed and efficiency with their header bidder? That’s where server-to-server header bidding comes in. Moving the auction to the server-side involves keeping only one partner in the client and allowing this partner to conduct the auction via its server. This server requests bids from other partners’ servers (partners that would traditionally have been on the client) and conducts an upfront tier 1 auction. This server-to-server communication gets past client (browser) side limitations mentioned earlier. This, in turn, reduces latency and allows for making calls to many-many other partners eventually enhancing user experience and increasing yield. It looks like this:


more at

[geheimnis2] 28/3/2017 20:44

Oh dear....lol...

Next poo afc will be wibbling on about trabants...

Wibble wibble...trabant...wibble wibble

Lol!

[geheimnis2] 28/3/2017 15:30

The Roll Call of the Fallen Trolls

Clubbie
Begs
Striker5
JontheC

Next Up

Loops
Poo AFC
Hotpants

;-)

[barkboo] 28/3/2017 15:29

Loopy Loopy nuts are we - share price now at 43p

[rnpatel] 28/3/2017 15:28

Jon the C and leluot3;)

[football] 28/3/2017 15:26

Leluot3 are you sure your not a bloke with all the ballocks you talk...

[football] 28/3/2017 15:24

whats the colour again Leluot3?


leluot328 Mar '17 - 15:05 - 5693 of 5693 0 0 (premium)
oh dear, Gimpy loose from his home care again

what an utter buffoon


I see the shares are really in demand again today - whats the colour Gimpy?

[leluot3] 28/3/2017 15:05

oh dear, Gimpy loose from his home care again

what an utter buffoon


I see the shares are really in demand again today - whats the colour Gimpy? Ask your carer!

Thats 46p to 41p
Nice for us shorters
Thanks girls

[polythene] 28/3/2017 14:45

I see no evidence that the pressure on the big two(three?) is increasing our revenues to date. More likely I think that Electronic advertising in general will be affected, at least in the short term?