Redt Energy Share Discussion Threads

[dogrunner11] 17/1/2017 15:10

That's a fiver for our 0p for those who don't follow the loser.

[dogrunner11] 17/1/2017 15:06

"I get paid over a quid per kWh for energy i export, compared to a wholesale price of about 4p/kWh (i.e. 25 times as much)"

Diesel generator would be cheaper Pierre, not that it should stopped you pocket being lined.

Mmmmmm

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 15:05

New Energy Storage Deployment in Asia Pacific
New Energy Storage Deployments in Asia Pacific’s Major Markets Are Expected to Total Nearly 37 GW from 2015 to 2025, According to Navigant Research.
Variable renewable energy generation is driving interest in grid-tied energy storage technologies, report finds.
While system costs remain one of the largest hurdles to the energy storage industry’s growth, declining prices are helping to move the technology into diverse geographic markets. Because energy storage is quickly becoming a flexible and cost-effective tool for users to control energy costs and for grid operators to manage network instability, several countries are projected to see substantial growth in deployments in the coming decade, with five country-level markets in Asia Pacific expected to experience the largest increases globally. Click to tweet: According to a new report from Navigant Research, new energy storage deployments in Asia Pacific’s five major markets are expected to total nearly 37 GW from 2015 to 2025

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 15:02

Nasrol Firdaus Abdul Wahab
Senior Engineer, Master System
Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB)
Malaysia

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 14:49

MM,s robbing the weak holders...

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 14:49

well if the admission of 184 million share has the effect of a 30% rise, perhaps they should issue 2.4 billion........

12bn buy now and have done with it, I was all behind you when you went all in at LGO, said then you were brave....be bold and buy here....

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 14:29

really pierre.....

"I get paid over a quid per kWh for energy i export, compared to a wholesale price of about 4p/kWh (i.e. 25 times as much)"

so now you are an energy generation company????

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 14:26

pierre the tarrif you refer too is the standby tarrif, where coal gas oil diesel generators are paid to supply on the spot generation....

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 14:19

pierre which feed in tarrif are you on and the whole world will join!!!

Reviews to feed-in tariff rates in 2011[edit]
Less than a year into the scheme, in March 2011 the new coalition Government announced that support for large-scale photovoltaic installations (greater than 50 kW) would be cut.[10] From 1 August 2011 the rate for installations over 50 kW was to range from 19p/kWh to 8.5p/kWh for the largest qualifying installations (5MW), with the Government claiming that this would prevent the scheme from becoming 'overwhelmed'.[11]

Revised tariffs for farm-scale anaerobic digestion initially of either 14p/kWh or 13p/kWh,[12] depending on the installation size, were introduced from September 2011.[11]

On 31 October 2011 a second review of the Feed in Tariffs for low carbon electricity generation was announced which is likely to take effect from 12 December 2011. The rates for small photovoltaic installations have been reduced from 43.3p/kWh to 21 pence/kWh. The reason for the second review is that FITs for PV were being taken up too quickly and that the DECC funding allocation for FITs was in danger of being exceeded. A further reason is that the cost of installing PV panels has reduced by around 50% and therefore the FITs had become less of an encouragement to install PV panels and more of an incitement to profit from excessive subsidies. See revised tariff tables for FITs.[12]

Reviews to feed-in tariff rates in 2012[edit]
In its second year, the government announced further cuts to the FIT scheme. On 3 March the tariff was cut to 21p/kWh. This cut was originally scheduled for 12 December 2011 but was delayed, following a successful joint appeal to the High Court by Friends of the Earth and two solar companies, Solar Century and HomeSun.[13] The 1 August review of the FIT brought an additional cut to 16p/kWh. The cut was partnered with a rise in export rate (the price at which the homeowner can sell excess electricity back to the supplier) from 3.1p to 4.5p for every kWh of electricity exported to the grid.[14] The latest cut came into effect on 1 November, the tariff dropping to 15.44p/kWh, and this rate is set to remain until 1 February 2013. In addition to this, generators with more than 25 Solar PV installations were granted a 10% increase in the amount they receive of the FIT, from 80% to 90%, this however will not be likely to affect domestic users.[15] The cut in FITs was due to the falling installation costs, and the fact that people were applying for the feed-in tariff scheme in numbers exceeding DECC forecasts and funding allocations. The aforementioned rates would only affect new installations - existing schemes would not be affected . The new tariffs would also now be paid over 20 years instead of 25 years (It will remain linked to the Retail Price Index) with a review every three months based on solar PV uptake levels in the three different bands: domestic (size 0-10 kW), small commercial (10-50 kW) and large commercial (above 50 kW and standalone installations).[16] Despite suggestions that the European solar market is in decline, a report [17] by the International Energy Agency has shown that for a second year in a row solar PV was the dominant form of new electricity installation during 2012, ahead of both wind and gas power.

[someuwin] 17/1/2017 14:14

Very low volume.

This will surge with the next wave of buying...

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 14:12

Pieere you do not take into account your health, this is a transision period to a renewable majority, the oil companies now know this and the powers that be want a renewable world, hence COP22.... anybody not towing the line in years to come will be punished with trade sanctions.....so it would be a case of take your pick, impliment renewables or suffer..

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 14:07

Pierre thats what I said last week you never will...

12bn good to see you still want to buy, as to wheather you get in under 10p remains to be seen......

[12bn] 17/1/2017 13:50

Heading back to 8p,I did warn you lot. :)

[pierre oreilly] 17/1/2017 13:46

Don't you ever see a paradox in your posts dig?

Many popsts saying how cheap renewable energy is and how its getting cheaper and certainly now cheaper than conventional generation, and also many posts saying how many millions of subsidies are giving to support the renewable energy.

I'll throw some light on the situation for you. Wind and solar are very expensive compared to traditional generation. I get paid over a quid per kWh for energy i export, compared to a wholesale price of about 4p/kWh (i.e. 25 times as much). The numbers you read on wind/solar cost is the net cost after subsidies and don't take effect of the negative effects on the grid - without millions and millions in subsidies there would be no wind or solar connected to the grid.

You may like intermittent renewable energy, no probs with that, but just be a little more accepting that when you read its cheaper that gas/coal/nukes, it is a blatant lie or at the very least a massive distortion of the facts, and the actual coat is an order of magnitude higher when grid connected. And even at those prices (paid for by you an me in bills), more billions have to be spent on storage to lessen the effects of the damaging effects intermittent generation has on our grid at current penetration levels.

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 13:09

The state’s current target calls for 22.5 percent of the electricity used in New Jersey to come from renewable energy by 2020. The Senate, however, has approved a bill (S-2444) calling for 80 percent of electricity to be supplied by renewable energy by 2050, although the measure is not expected to win final approval before the end of the current legislative session next week.
Because of efforts by the Obama administration to combat global climate change, states will be under pressure to develop less-polluting forms of energy, including renewable sources.

About 15 percent of the state’s energy mix comes from renewable sources, most of that from out-of-state systems, according to a recent update of the Energy Master Plan. Nearly 3 percent of that mix comes from solar systems.

While energy-storage systems are still in their early stages, the price for the systems is dropping rapidly as the technology to build them grows more efficient and advanced.

This is the second year the agency has funded energy storage. Last year, it gave out $2.9 million to 13 projects after receiving 22 applications. The incentives were awarded to schools, a municipal complex in Jersey City, and wastewater treatment facilities. Twelve of the 13 systems were given incentives largely to provide backup power to solar deployments; the final award went to the Atlantic County Utilities Authority, which has five wind turbines in Atlantic City.

Funding for the program is derived from a surcharge on customers’ utility bills, which is used by the BPU to finance a variety of clean-energy projects. This year’s overall clean-energy budget, which began July 1, is approximately $344 million.

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 12:43

But coupled with this technology, we could see a fully renewable powered tanker...


An oil supertanker powered by solar and wind
Richard Sauter has designed a supertanker that will cut greenhouse gas emissions by 75 percent and save oil companies upwards of $60 million a year on fuel costs.

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 12:36

I do not think the current technology would fuel a large vessel at this moment in time, but in the futre quite possible..

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 12:34

Alchemy forever...there will be no degradation, Isuppose if it was not maintained parts would deteriorate but that goes for everything...

It could be charged and never used and in 10 years time it would still hold that charge, it could be left totaly depleated and in 10 years time it would still charge to 100%....

[alchemy] 17/1/2017 12:17

Two things . Never dream of takeovers. Never denigrate market-makers.How long can a charged RedT container be kept without use?I ask because I wondered about powering vessels on the oceans. Tanker fuel is awful stuff. Could PV plus storage power large vessels that need power for long times?

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 11:00

Hawaii, Scotland present energy storage approaches for Australia

Energy storage is on course to see a boom similar to that in the solar market; Australia aims to tap this potential to facilitate the further roll out of renewables. A new study has identified key investment areas, and barriers, to storage implementation. An overview of the global storage market sees Hawaii and Scotland presenting viable approaches to implementation, although California and Germany are said to have the most “thorough” storage programs.

AUGUST 11, 2015 PV MAGAZINE

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 10:53

Germany's solar+storage subsidy extended to 2018

The German battery storage subsidy, for households adding a battery system to their PV array, has received funding through to 2018. The scheme has been allocated around EUR 30 million by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy. The program commences March 1.

FEBRUARY 22, 2016 PV MAGAZINE

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 10:49

50p and they can have mine, bags me a few million....

[dlg3] 17/1/2017 10:47

Pierre if a takover was to happen I think we would be left with Camco and the REDT side taken over..