We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qonnectis | QTI | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.225 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.225 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 05/7/2010 14:19 by mhw28865 I dont know how you can of heard anything as i know a couple of people and myself who have phoned QTI and got sod all from them just same old news due soon to get rid of us!! |
Posted at 18/5/2010 13:38 by gogoneko GWR7,It was a train - the QTI pathetic directors gravy train as they flashed by with their pocketed salaries. Even if the company relists will anybody ever trust any one of this "management" (had to put that in quotes!)? Who could possible believe that there's an ounce of care or consideration for shareholders during all this? |
Posted at 11/1/2010 12:17 by sandspider2000 Do people think that the (potential) reverse takeover of American Leak Detection by QTI is good news? I assume it must be, but... |
Posted at 11/1/2010 10:22 by gogoneko Looks like QTI shareholders will be able to trade their shares again if the negotiations conclude successfully, that should be a relief. At what price though I've no idea as there's already been a dilution and they're already talking of a larger fundraising "Proposed Placing" to follow. |
Posted at 16/7/2009 16:53 by inside2 Also work out how much QTI need to survive another year, at the least, plus R&D now add that up. Next work out a placing at .1p and see just how many shares that equates to, add to the number of shares in issue and you get some idea what your holding will be worth when those shares hit the secondary market. QTI need a share price as high as possible to show a good enough discount to encourage the lender to part with the cash. Right now you buyers are helping QTI to get a deal done while the shrewed money is waiting to see what QTI have on offer, new IP or deals that require finance ect then with dilution out of the way we may well consider it worth while and start buying. By that time all the shaky holders and there are many of them will have sold, at a loss and the price will have tanked. |
Posted at 15/7/2009 14:19 by inside2 Buyers are buying because there is a possibility of funding? That is just about the most stupid thing I have ever heard, do you bimbo's not realise it will delute the share price massively and have you not considered that the CEO has already alerted prospective lenders to the fact that QTI will fold without funding so they know QTI has no option but to accept what is on offer no matter how onerous. Unless there is something, like new ground breaking IP the best she can show is a £20,000 half year t/o and a cash burn that is embarrassing plus a deal with another international reseller after the last one presumably gave up after not producing any sales at all. If the management had spent as much time and effort getting sales as they have on milking any value left in the share price perhaps QTI would not be in this hole. |
Posted at 14/7/2009 10:41 by inside2 The reason I got out is because the funding requirement can only be met by giving a large chunk of QTI away and will be very delutive. As for the latest marketing contract I would suggest you all cast you memories back to just such a contract specifically for LeakFrog. Now that is not to say Primary Water will not produce the goods just that QTI has a poor record in appointing resellers. I notice talk on this bullitien board of the activity by the gas and electricity utilities re Smart Meters, QTI is not in this market and if you read much on the subject would realise that internationally these two markets are just about wrapped up by far larger concerns than QTI. This is about water, nothing else. QTI made it clear last year that water is their market place and at the time I considered it a good move as it was clear we could not compete in the energy market. Best advice is to be patient and wait until the full effect of any dilutive funding is apparent before committing your cash. |
Posted at 08/7/2009 09:02 by toad6 SAGEM - 8 Jul'09 - 08:42 - 4937 of 4938toad6 - did you mean on QTI....I did not mean other companies. In the present situation with QTI £6000 IS A LOT TO CHANCE I wouldn't give QTI the steam off my sh1t on a frosty morning, let alone £6,000. I'd rather stick it on the 33:1 shot at Newmarket, at least then I know I have some chance... |
Posted at 02/7/2009 10:42 by gogoneko Unfortunately a refinancing doesn't alter the fact that the company isn't selling its product and the market cap of QTI should be a fraction of what it is now to reflect the ongoing failures.QTI's "refinancing" is simply a pawning of their remaining assets according to what's been announced so far. The only reason to get positive about QTI would be if an order arrived, even a small one, to indicate that they really have built something someone's prepared to buy. |
Posted at 14/2/2009 16:42 by inside2 My post yesterday was an attempt to get some debate going on the issue of Smart Meters and QTI's future in this regard, unfortunately no one saw fit to respond. Unless one of the four clowns who have posted since my post of the 13th had a view on the issue. Of course the answer to my question can only be no! The reason for that was made quite clear to me as I listened to the heads of all the power utilities answering questions put to them by the commons select committee this week. What become abundantly clear was the fact that we have still not moved on from the position set three years ago by, what we laughingly call, government and their promise to set clear guidelines for the Utilities. There is still no clarity, as promised, to protect the utilities should they embark on a massive capital expenditure as would be required for a blanket roll out of smart meters. The Utilities are positive and are all involved one way or another with smart meters some being involved in massive roll outs in other countries.Some very large Internet and Technology players are becoming involved in Smart Networks as they can see the huge potential world wide opportunity for massive revenue streams with possible management contracts to follow. Because of the involvement of these global players, such as Google, I can see little hope for QTI, with the limits of it's finance and technology, being able to get even a foot hold in this energy market. QTI just does not have the weight. Added to this is the fact that I have never heard from any source ever, anything that would indicate that the My Meter platform is being trialed by any of the Utilities anywhere in the UK, it's not as though QTI have only just started in this. However taking all that into consideration does not in anyway mean that QTI is not a worth while investment. QTI have made it clear that their efforts are concentrated in the Water Industry. No doubt they have come to recognized they are not able to compete in the Energy Market with such heavy weights having set out their stall and clear intention of running this particular show. What makes water so attractive is the lack of glamour and seemingly of little interest to major players added to this is time scale. Nothing 'Smart' will happen in in the Water Industry in the short term. More like five or ten years, plenty of time for QTI to hone it's already considerable network of contacts and gain a clear understanding of just what is needed to satisfy what will be a very complex Smart Network for this paticular industry. We must not forget LeakFrog which in my opinion will become a great little earner as it is further developed to make it more attractive to potential customers. Besides being simple to use yet highly reliable it's other great advantage is of course it's cost. Nothing else comes anywhere near it in this regard. We all know about the Drive By model but as that does nothing the Istaq/My Meter can't already do it is not competing with LeakFrog QTI really does need to increase cash-flow as it's currant burn is a little worrying and currant conditions are unsuitable for raising cash, and that is the risk. Downside currently has the balance in my opinion but still QTI remains better than a stright gamble and I shall continue to hold. A little good luck never goes a miss of course. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
