Proteome Sciences Share Discussion Threads

[wrighty41] 20/12/2022 11:28

It looks like another year of non-delivery, albeit I do expect revenues to have increased again when we get the FY22 numbers.
I do think the Board need to realistically review the long-term viability of the company & the ability to create shareholder value.
So far the jury remains out on both counts!

[tom barnaby] 19/12/2022 10:40

Good man Geraldine 455.

[tom barnaby] 19/12/2022 10:33

If you really fancy a larf, just look at the cobblers that reamins highlighted in the header.

[peverill] 19/12/2022 10:28

Imminent they said.?????.

[monte1] 14/12/2022 12:53

Eek - suddenly it starts to make sense;

The cast list specifies only one boy.

The boy in Act I, a local lad, assures Vladimir that this is the first time he has seen him. He says he was not there the previous day. He confirms he works for Mr. Godot as a goatherd

[jeffian] 14/12/2022 10:39

Have you ever seen 'Waiting for Godot', pev?

[peverill] 14/12/2022 09:27

Imminent they said ?????

[canaletto] 12/12/2022 21:36

At least the Diggle Brothers made money from Scancell.

[dominiccummings] 10/12/2022 21:10

I believe Goatherd has gone trans and actually now identifies as Mrs Tina Doyle.

[monte1] 10/12/2022 19:56

Thanks Stephensstephens - does Mrs Tina Doyle also have the freebb avatar ‘goatherd̵7;?

[peverill] 10/12/2022 15:51

I have heard through two, totally separate channels, that it will be "any day now".I believe my sources are honest - I just hope their sources are knowledgeable - there is every reason why they should be.I shall be very disappointed if it does not come in this year.Goatherd 5/12/22 and more backtracking today,have you ever thought of leaving the bb for a while Richard,it's getting laughable.

[goatherd] 10/12/2022 15:16

DC,

Are they bundling it with other tests? I have some doubt. However it would not surprise me if they made some link-up arrangement with a block-buster manufacturer.

It could be (pure conjecture here) that negotiating such an arrangement is what is causing the delay. Though, personally, I think that they are making so much money with Covid diagnostics that it is all hands on deck for that.

It IS available, but only in the research package; which is, I believe, identical to the diagnostic package, apart from the CE.

[dominiccummings] 10/12/2022 10:14

#91835/6 Er... the fact that Randox have been very slow to market, that they are bundling it with other tests, that it is still not available.

[wtf1] 09/12/2022 17:43

goatherd - 21 Nov 2013 - 14:20:52 - 36679 of 91838 Proteome Sciences leading Alzheimer's technology. - PRM




No UTC, you have misunderstood my position.



My original series of "guesstimates" which resulted in the $53 (wasn't it £53?) was an attempt to see what Proteome might be worth -

subject to a series of caveats, which included requirements that the tests worked, and were marketed. That was, indeed, then marked down to 40ish somethings.


I never said, or expected, that Proteome would be taken out for that.



My belief in the likelihood of a take-out came later - and I do not think I ever predicted a value for that. Although I have quoted Mr Pearce's suggested prices of £20 [which I think was [?is] his target] and an absolute minimum of £8. I have also mentioned that I will be happy with £5 - but, like all lths would like more.

Obviously time has changed some things. For example I never included anything for AD, which might be our biggest asset now, but I did include BSE which seems to have faded into obscurity as the control measures have worked.



Subject to that I stand by everything I have ever posted - provided it is read in context and with my caveats.



I have always said my guesstimates were very conservative. If I was doing them now I think [without detailed checking] that the test prices I used would have increased at least ten fold.

.

[peverill] 09/12/2022 17:00

Bit rich coming from you,who has made a BB profession of random forecasts.None of which materialised I note.

[goatherd] 09/12/2022 15:21

Peverill,

And, pray, what grounds do you have for making that statement?

Or do you think that "grounds" are not necessary on a Free BB?

[goatherd] 09/12/2022 15:21

Peverill,

And, pray, what grounds do you have for making that statement?

Or do you think that "grounds" are not necessary on a Free BB?

[peverill] 09/12/2022 13:30

A test,probably not this one ;-×.

[dominiccummings] 09/12/2022 13:19

I thought common knowledge was that the market was desperate for the test?

[peverill] 09/12/2022 07:06

What do Randox class as imminent ?????.

[monte1] 08/12/2022 19:41

#59366 please see #59365