Re: "Mike290 is a PANR shareholder sat on massive losses like most of them.".
Actually, I'm sitting on a huge profit.
Just shows what you know :-) |
Re: "Mike290 is a PANR shareholder sat on massive losses like most of them.".
Actually, I'm sitting on a huge profit.
Just shows what you know :-) |
Re: "Mike290 is a PANR shareholder sat on massive losses like most of them.".
Actually, I'm sitting on a huge profit.
Just shows what you know :-) |
Mike..... 🤣🤣🤣🤣9315;🤣ԍ15;🤣🤣;🤣 |
Newcomers to this thread,
Here is a repeat of Chris0805's warning about Pro_S2009.
"Pro_S2009 frequently posts misinformation in order to attempt to manipulate share prices,
Pro_S2009 does this across multiple stocks and has an appalling reputation amongst most other posters.
Pro_S2009 frequently creates new threads on his/her target company and bans any poster who questions the Pro_S2009 integrity and complete lack of ethics & morals.
ProS_2009 also edits posts previously made when his / her viewpoint changes to suit his/her trading style.
...... (two sentences removed to avoid confusion) - my note
Trust the Pro_S2009 poster at your financial peril." |
Newcomers to this thread,
Here is a repeat of Chris0805's warning about Pro_S2009.
"Pro_S2009 frequently posts misinformation in order to attempt to manipulate share prices,
Pro_S2009 does this across multiple stocks and has an appalling reputation amongst most other posters.
Pro_S2009 frequently creates new threads on his/her target company and bans any poster who questions the Pro_S2009 integrity and complete lack of ethics & morals.
ProS_2009 also edits posts previously made when his / her viewpoint changes to suit his/her trading style.
...... (two sentences removed to avoid confusion) - my note
Trust the Pro_S2009 poster at your financial peril." |
As Helpfull is Pro_S2009...
Newcomers to this thread,
Here is a repeat of Chris0805's warning about Pro_S2009.
"Pro_S2009 frequently posts misinformation in order to attempt to manipulate share prices,
Pro_S2009 does this across multiple stocks and has an appalling reputation amongst most other posters.
Pro_S2009 frequently creates new threads on his/her target company and bans any poster who questions the Pro_S2009 integrity and complete lack of ethics & morals.
ProS_2009 also edits posts previously made when his / her viewpoint changes to suit his/her trading style.
...... (two sentences removed to avoid confusion) - my note
Trust the Pro_S2009 poster at your financial peril." |
The force is strong here.
When the company informs shareholders it is going to test Mou-3 and Mou-1 in future, it should also give a date when that testing will begin.
And then stick to it.
If it doesn't, then shareholders will know that there are negotiations going on in the background and a mammoth deal is pending. And it is probably because they have discovered so much gas it would be rude to test it. And that the buyer doesn't want anyone to know, including themselves, how much gas they are buying.
Always works like that. If I'm not mistaken, Cove Energy behaved in exactly the same manner. If they would have tested they would probably have got less dosh.
Be careful. |
Paul better release some good news soon . Some of us have been very patient for a long time |
Red or black is incorrect. How many different sands need testing? Odds are heavily heavily (twice) in favour this being commercial. CPR says zero geological risk at MOU 1 for example. We can sit it out. |
PRDs welching on deadlines is not new. It is red or black at this stage. PG is either a grifter or a curmudgeonly genius. GRH's recent post is plausible but he could also be part of the grift so...red or black? |
The force is strong here.
It is startlingly simple.
The start of testing was announced in the RNS dated 5 Oct 2023:
"Rigless testing MOU-3 using conventional perforating guns is currently forecast to begin on or before 16 October 2023, assuming that the wireline logging unit is released from its present contract on or before 10 October 2023. The Company will provide an update if there is any change to this date"
Because no update of any change was provided, investors believed testing had started. 20 days had passed. With no update.
The MOU is a poor excuse.
What compounds the snub is that any new date for a start of testing is left open ended as no date for the MOU is given. More of the same.
Be careful. |
 lets see how it goes...
[sine qua non - an essential condition; a thing that is absolutely necessary]
--
grh:
▶️υ4;️▶5039;👓◀;️◀A039;◀️ Today 19:42
Evening
This post will be brief
It is trying to help folk make sense of what has occurred this week
Yes...it is the view of one Random Old Boy
Yes...it is hypothetical
Yes...it could be incorrect ...
In whole or in part only...
As if...
1...The completion of the TT deal necessitated an RNS...
It was... and remains... a sine qua non
of maintaing a quotation on the London Stock Exchange
2...That RNS contained a very brief progress report on Guercif...
That seemed to upset several folk
but PRD could hardly say nothing at that juncture ...
The words were carefully chosen
3...but I think that PRD had hoped to publicise
the signature of a GSA MOU...
AND
to announce commencement of testing ...
In a simultaneous announcement
(but were caught by the need to RNS the TT deal)...
4...Looking forward
I now hope to see a GSA MOU in short time...
🔥🔥🔥
That would need approval by ONHYM I think
5...I now hope to hear of testing asap
And Jurassic up dip drill...MOU5...
🔥🔥🔥
In relatively short time
6...I also hope to hear of an even wider 'commercial transaction' in due course
🔥🔥🔥
This really is big
I have never invested in anything bigger
Regards
GRH1+ |
Whilst not being at all happy with the sleight of hand tactics wrt the testing, I am trusting PG to know what he is doing............he hasn't given any reason to the contrary in all this time and the deal he did with T&T was impressive and seems to indicate that he hasn't lost his marbles yet.
So, what is an avatar to do.........but to buy even more shares.
Looking forward to the GSA, although my nervousness is that Sound Energy (who I admit to not be following very much in recent years) seem to have been negotiating theirs for what seems like five years. |
The force is strong here.
Same mistake being made.
Assumptions
Assuming negotiations are being carried out. They have been going on for two years, haven't they?
How many offtakers of the gas have there been?
Weren't they supposed to fund the drills?
A few days ago it was assumed testing was going on.
Wasn't it in a RNS?
Just like the "negotiations".
There has been no testing for the last two years.
Why would anyone think there have been negotiations to sell the gas or the company?
Be careful. |
As I've stated previously, why Paul sets dates I haven't a clue. He hasn't adhered to any. Reminds me a lot of Block Energy, the board promising an exceptional future and shareholders continue to wait. |
Well I think we are now rid of all the short termers....the spread betters.........they have all gone.
Which is fine, as when things turn upwards they will all pile back in again, but pay higher than they just sold out for.......
Strange people. |
Yes but that was before the delay in getting sandier therefore circumstances determined a change of strategy to get income in through MOU3 and 1. |
The wolf is loose :o) |
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
Hot Features
Premium
