We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Powerhouse Energy Group Plc | LSE:PHE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WQVY43 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.05 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scrap & Waste Materials-whsl | 380k | -46.2M | -0.0111 | -0.92 | 42.41M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/11/2017 17:54 | The directors have share options. | vatnabrekk | |
05/11/2017 14:33 | The only company in the world that can produce hydrogen from waste - firstly that is simply untrue and secondly if he believes it to be true why has he no stake in the company ! Sometime the bleedin obvious is best not ignored. | lagosboy | |
05/11/2017 12:32 | What is the capacity of the current G3-uht unit. Have they said whether it's 1 tpd or 1-3 tpd etc? | superg1 | |
05/11/2017 12:24 | It takes 11 cubic meters of Hydrogen to make 1kg. In the recent news they said 50 cubic meters per hour at 50% hydrogen. So that means 25 cubic metres per hour post PSA. On the Toyota mentions the Mirai as 4.7 kg. 200 cars per day can fill up was said from 25 tonnes of tyres. The total for the cars would be 200 x 4.7 kg = 940 kg. 940 x 11 equates to a need of 10,340 cubic metres of Hydrogen per day. The news gives 25 cubic meters per hour and the need to fill those cars would be 470 cubic meters per hour based on the 22 hour run time they have previously mentioned. So around 19 times the rate of whatever they ran at as detailed in the news. They will get nowhere near that with general waste so it would have to similar waste with high calorific values. | superg1 | |
05/11/2017 12:07 | Well said vat, Your wasting your time posting as both sides have agenda's at play. | tenapen | |
05/11/2017 11:53 | The only company worldwide that can produce Hydrogen from waste. Is that right? That's what he said at the end. At least there were some figures in there. 1 truck = 25 tonnes of tyres = enough hydrogen for 200 cars. Time to get the calculator out. | superg1 | |
05/11/2017 11:34 | I thought I 'd look up tyres after that podcast to see what happens to them. There are clear comments about high calorific sources so it seems waste to energy considering eternal and fill waste is not an option because the lower down the calorific value you go the less hydrogen you will get. One trigger being that Keith says there are 700 million used tyres each year in the UK, he is out by a factor of ten but I think it was just a mistake on his part as he goes on to say 1 tyre for every person in the UK. A bit daft to make such a simple mistake though in the first place. Mind you the 30 days timeline turned into about 500 so he isn't good with numbers at times. See the link. 100% of UK tyres and recycled in some way | superg1 | |
05/11/2017 09:00 | Perhaps you can state what share options the directors have been granted by the company; a). The number,. b) the option exercise price. and c) the expiry length of the option. Not complicated is it,.or is it???¿ | dolphin158 | |
05/11/2017 08:32 | Have you listened to KA's VOX interview on 24th October? He explains the situation regarding the directors' shareholdings. At 36 minutes in on the recording: | vatnabrekk | |
05/11/2017 07:44 | Vat re "There is absolutely nothing wrong with the directors holding no shares at this stage" I don't know any shareholder in any share that would consider that not to be an issue but on point why is that fine when the CEO is claiming this in the holy grail of waste to energy cracked and ready to conquer the world. The fact is it still isn't proven to work commercially, there have been no material independent lengthy tests completed. That's why many looking on are not interested in buying any until it's fully proven, capex opex and so on. It will be some time to get to that stage. | superg1 | |
04/11/2017 18:36 | I wonder why you wish to stop people voicing an opinion Vstnabrekk??? | dolphin158 | |
04/11/2017 18:10 | Give it a rest dolphin. | vatnabrekk | |
04/11/2017 04:37 | Stu, why do you not also praise the directors? Saying good luck to all holders only includes one director, the remaining directors don't hold any shares. | dolphin158 | |
03/11/2017 15:59 | Deccer1 thanks for the beautiful ray of sunshine Friday afternoon upbeat, go get em tiger ? comments, invested here are we ? Hope you have a great weekend...?Good luck to all holders of course...PHE will see this through....SJ | stuj1970 | |
03/11/2017 15:56 | "Commercial system still not even past the design stage" Is that meant to be a criticism? If so, why? Every new development has to go through these steps and processes, so why does that seem to be a problem for you? | vatnabrekk | |
03/11/2017 15:48 | Retrace to 0.4p to 0.5p range looking likely. Commercial system still not even past the design stage, let alone building, testing, certification, etc. And need more cash. | deccer1 | |
03/11/2017 08:22 | So it seems that the plastic that we so carefully segregate and put into separate bins, ends up in the ocean somewhere in the Far East, floats back here in the form of micro particles, get eaten by our fish, and ends up on our plates. Is this what's known as getting our own-back? | vatnabrekk | |
02/11/2017 20:22 | I make no comment on that supernumerary, just an interesting story that seems to be unreported in the UK press. Everyone knows this virtuous "recycling" is a con, we ship our waste half way round the world where it is probably burnt anyway. But all that plastic has gotta go somewhere.... | bittorrent | |
02/11/2017 19:52 | I thought we were leaving the EU? Or is PHE going to relocate to Germany? Whence, if I remember correctly, it had its first great triumph: Of course they'd have to relearn how to burn waste rather than useful raw materials... | supernumerary | |
02/11/2017 19:40 | China is no longer the EU’s plastic dumping ground: What’s next? Across Europe on 1 January, the rubbish is going to start piling up. But unlike years gone by, it won’t just be the leftovers from festive excess – we’re going to need to find a new home for the almost three million tonnes of plastics that the EU has been exporting every year to China. While our plastic recycling rates are on the rise – jumping to 30% in 2015 from 19% eight years previously – this hides a murky reality. 40% of plastics collected for recycling in the EU are exported, mainly to Asian countries where they are often recycled under precarious conditions and at lower standards. These exports increased by a massive 413% between 2002 and 2015, with the vast majority (87% in 2012) ending up in China. The Chinese government announced in July that it will ban plastic waste imports from 2018, purportedly to reduce waste smuggling and strengthen recycling of their domestic waste. | bittorrent | |
02/11/2017 17:25 | Yes these 'ladies' seem to alight on dotards who they can rinse I expect you'll be off on a holiday to Thailand soon as well no doubt | the stigologist |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions