Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[babbler] 10/2/2017 13:37

Approaching year high which will take some to beat...

[the_fiddler] 10/2/2017 13:28

:D - hxxps://www.directorstalkinterviews.com/powerhouse-energy-group-plc-two-years-hard-work-paying-off/412723574

[the_fiddler] 10/2/2017 13:27

+70% looks like its going to bag.

[babbler] 10/2/2017 13:23

Dark energy you just need to research eh? See the interview today with the management? No? Didn't think so....

[babbler] 10/2/2017 13:22

Dark energy you just need to research eh? See the interview today with the management? No? Didn't think so...

[nelson5100] 10/2/2017 13:19

Is there a TR1 published for the recent Yady Worldwide shareholding which was more than 3% of the total voting shares. The RNS disclosed that application had been made for the 35,714,285 ordinary shares to trade on AIM on or around the 3 February.

Two trading days after that is midnight on 7 February and three trading days after that is midnight on 10 February.

[dark energy] 10/2/2017 12:23

what news?

Another BS P&D by colin.

[babbler] 10/2/2017 11:14

As they are aware of upcoming news I think you will find its illegal for them to buy any...

[nelson5100] 10/2/2017 11:05

With all this positive news then the directors will all be buying the shares if they are that cheap and the product is such a game changer? When did they last buyer any shares, can anybody show me the dates from December 2012 to date?

[dr jekyll] 10/2/2017 10:31

A very positive interview which may have encouraged some buying today. Thanks for the link Colin.

[tuff] 10/2/2017 10:12

Looking awesome here... great interview...:)

[pelliot] 10/2/2017 09:43

nice interview on Directors Talk

[dolphin158] 09/2/2017 22:48

Read the 2015 accounts and the 2016 interim accounts ( especially note 5) to see the standard of financial reporting. One regulator that is good is the FRC and they will be made aware of the 2015 accounts, both the original and the amended versions.

On the other board all the messages about PHE have been removed as certain posters cannot tolerate those who can analyse accounts and highlight errors in a company's financial reporting.

But, those BB posters who shout down others merely draw attention to the inadequacies of their investment rather than protecting it.

[supernumerary] 09/2/2017 21:23

' a quoted company ' - on AIM? I don't think regulators give a damn about what happens on AIM - let's face it this is for all practical purposes a private company, and what have the various regulators done to correct the situation? Naff-all.

I remember the BPRG/Meldex fiasco - as egregious a piece of fraud as you could wish to see, and what's been done? You guessed it - SFA.

As always, but even more so on AIM - caveat emptor...

[nelson5100] 09/2/2017 17:07

AIM regulation can only deal with companies on AIM, whereas FCA have greater powers to investigate and to fine. For example, a former chairman of a quoted company was fined £210,000 by the Financial Services Authority in an enforcement action for breach of rule 5 of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

[nelson5100] 09/2/2017 13:30

Probably forward to the FCA to investigate as they are the regulators and have powers to fine and other sanctions.

[supernumerary] 09/2/2017 12:39

Probably best to start with Renewme - they're responsible for raising the TR-1, not phe.

[nelson5100] 09/2/2017 10:40

Under the FSA's Disclosure & Transparency Rule 5 - shareholders must notify a company when their voting rights reaches, exceeds or falls below 3% and each 1% increment or decrease. The disclosure must be made within two trading days after they trigger any of these limits. In addition, the AIM company must disseminate this notification via an RIS to inform the market, and must do so without delay.

Checking the significant shareholders I cannot find an RIS by the company for the 90,932,961 ordinary shares issued to Renewme Limited which discloses all the information required under DTR 5. Has the company been informed by Renewme Ltd of its shareholding which would have been 15.96% in May 2016? If it has where is the RIS disseminating the information and if it hasn't been informed then will the FSA need to investigate compliance with DTR5?

On 11 March 2014 the company issued 18,331,996 ordinary shares to Renewme Limited which represented 5% of the company's total voting rights. Again, did Renewme Limited inform the company of its shareholding as it was above 3%? If it did inform the company where is the RIS and if the company was not informed then again perhaps the FSA needs to investigate compliance with DTR5?

In addition, the 18,331,996 shareholding is not separately disclosed in the 2014 audited accounts. So was the shareholding sold to below the 3% threshold as I cannot see any RIS disclosing this information under DTR5 or is it part of the Pershing or Lynchwood nominees shareholdings?

[mervin4] 06/2/2017 08:06

It will cost millions to build the waste stations.

How they going to pay for it?

More dilution from the confetti share issue factory?

More cheap stock for Mr Bond?