Physiomics Share Discussion Threads

[davevt] 28/11/2023 08:59

Everything Aberystwyth just wrote about what pyc does..

..isn't what pyc does.

[blueball] 27/11/2023 13:33

No reason to buy atm.

[davevt] 27/11/2023 10:07

think it's been deleted

[share14] 27/11/2023 08:59

Aberstywth throwing his toys out the pram this morning because nasty share4 said something bad about pyc
lol

[tees maar khan] 25/11/2023 20:28

Jim Millen is still laying the groundwork? He's been the CEO since April 2016. He won't buy any more shares, as he knows there's nothing there. Why would he buy a vast sum and dilute himself? It's a lifestyle company. Surely, he should call it a day? Peter Sargent seems clueless as well.

TMK

[davevt] 24/11/2023 08:46

So a load of your posts were deleted yet again..

[tees maar khan] 23/11/2023 17:38

What an utterly awful company. The CEO apologises whilst he destroys shareholder value.

TMK

[davevt] 22/11/2023 14:22

Every one of msks chart claims have never came.

They literally post these over and over until one comes vaguely true and says 'see, charts work' 🤣

[share14] 22/11/2023 13:40

Getting ramped a lot, wonder if that means placing coming

[criticalthinker1] 22/11/2023 07:05

I'm expecting news from a few companies to dovetail soon. Fingers crossed. Its been frustrating waiting but patience is a virtue.....

[davevt] 19/11/2023 19:10

Someone tell Trench that pyc gets a grant from innovate every single year...this one is not some out the blue opportunity

[davevt] 18/11/2023 19:44

Exactly...remember Laura always claiming they have 750k cash...well now we know they raise when they get down to 400k, so they actually only have 350k to play with.

[porky9] 18/11/2023 12:27

My analysis is not harsh but in layman’s terms, 25% of £1m tender pipeline is £250k of new. They are Very unlikely to BE in the current FY so will need a further raise in 24 with hope to add for Break even 25 if diversification can add to revenues.

As I say, a VERY slow burn here unless diversification revenues can materially add

[412069] 17/11/2023 10:13

Can’t believe you’re posting all your sh*%# on here as well P.
You need help pal, it won’t bring your dddd losses back only seeing a doctor will.

[ydderf] 16/11/2023 12:33

If the business of PYC is to raise money with endless placings to pay expenses and shareholders never object (the directors have never been voted out and the dis-application special resolutions to issue the confetti have always been approved)then it could be judged a success. Nothing illegal has been done and punters like Laura have always been able to stimulate profitable trading activity to provide liquidity for the next placing. The awful, painful, denied truth here is that in a shareholder democracy, shareholders implicitly approve, and objections are confined to bulletin boards and the like. Here's a question: Who is responsible/'guilty'?

It is hard not to put shareholders in the frame in this case

[1347] 15/11/2023 14:10

The FCA are asleep at the wheel on every AIM share on the London Laundromat. They are a fig leaf regulator, neither use nor ornament. As you say there is no incentive for these AIM companies to achieve growth because, to put is starkly, the aims of the Directors are first and foremost to get paid, not to achieve shareholder value, that's just the icing on the cake if it happens. That's why most bobble along for years with just the ocassional spike along the way.

[share14] 15/11/2023 13:10

Well this is the problem, if it was a private consultancy it wouldn't have lasted a few years, let alone almost 2 decades of being listed. There's no pressing need to make the company self sustaining if you can just go cap in hand to investors every few years.

Work in a small private firm and you have to do things like this and hustle hard from the get go, not many years down the line when it's getting more difficult to raise funds.

A lot of companys on AIM just seem to use shareholders as a way to pay for the business to exist, wasting their investment without returning an actual business that produces profits to them. Why bother if you don't have to? It's quite scandalous how often this happens, because with people like @Laura2022 around continually cheerleading the stock it's just too easy for them to get away with it. Even now it seems they're still doing research projects based on innovation grants instead of focusing on getting the company to breakeven.

This is why the cheerleaders need to be challenged and also lse which seems to be doing a great disservice to not only investors but the UK business environment with it's inability to regulate its forum appropriately. It's a symptom of where this Country is right now and how detached from fundamental values it's become. The FCA are asleep at the wheel on this one.

[porky9] 15/11/2023 11:50

It’s shocking that despite the huge amounts of investment gone in here this is the first time they have set up a CRM system. It’s not like this is new tech!

Jeeze, they should by now have made contact with every biotech target client there is and be regularly marketing out to them to be ready to tender for their next project.