Pcg Entertainment Share Discussion Threads

[bellesimo] 04/9/2017 09:24

RP A LOSER CEO AND THE BIGGEST LOSERS THE SHARE HOLDERS,ON LSE RP CREW VANISHED NOW BECAUSE SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN,AND RP WILL BE RETIRED AND ACTION AGAINST HIM FOR HES LIES,REMINDED ME OF CC AT AFPO.

[smart solution] 04/9/2017 09:14

Very true whitey.....keep turning the screw on Poulden on Twitter as well!

[pwhite73] 04/9/2017 09:11

No trades for the first hour which is good. It makes it difficult but not impossible for those with their snouts in the trough to dump their stock.

People have learned to keep away from this dog until some modicum of respect is shown to retail shareholders.

[smart solution] 03/9/2017 12:11

Lets see what this week brings.

[volsung] 03/9/2017 11:40

Jam tomorrow share

[trentendboy] 02/9/2017 20:42

Lol. Post of the week

[smart solution] 02/9/2017 20:11

Great stock.

[isaseeya] 02/9/2017 20:04

How low do you think it could fall?

[barnetpeter] 02/9/2017 19:51

This has always been a dawg and has lost investors 99.99 per cent of its money. But I am still confident that I will make money myself. It has a listing and a stack of cash and has just raised more. I don't mind waiting a bit longer myself.....it has a betting business which should mean no delisting. The directors are not taking a penny either.

So treat it as a cash shell, don't overpay and if we get 0.2 in time that will be a result! Nothing may happen til 2018 until this court stuff by the ceo is finalised.

Still a dawg of course.....

[danyo11] 02/9/2017 17:50

Do you still hold? Don't get me wrong I'm not happy with how this has panned out so far! I bought in off the back of what was at best a misinformed RNS put out by the last CEO, as a result I'm now nearly 2/3rds down. I can either sell now or hold out to see if this can be turned around. If it can then I am sure we can make money - it's a gamble, but am so far down now it's one I'm going to see through.

[pwhite73] 02/9/2017 17:39

danyo11

Ok lets agree to disagree and not lose focus on what's going on here. The mistake PI shareholders constantly make is to sit back and wait. "I'm happy with my investment", "just a few more weeks", "news is just around the corner". They all said the same thing in Cloudtag, MTV, Sefton, New World Oil and all the other China Filthy Forty stocks that have gone to money heaven.

Lets try not to make the same mistake here. There have been four placings this year so far. When there are no TR-1 notices issued for people that have stumped up £750k £350k, £400k and £1 million that's when you know something is not quite right.

Why are they not hanging around for the RTO?.

[danyo11] 01/9/2017 21:49

I said it was £80K. This is the statutory cap inclusive of compensations. In some cases, there is no cap on the compensation that can be awarded. There are a couple of scenarios where there is no cap - cases where as well as constructive dismissal, there is a claim for discrimination, whistleblowing, a breach of a health and safety issue or where you are dismissed after trying to assert a statutory right.

[pwhite73] 01/9/2017 19:19

A 3.5 million late dump today 16:27. A 6.8 million late dump yesterday 16:25. I suspect they are both coming from the same source Riverfort?.

[pwhite73] 01/9/2017 19:18

You can also tell those nincompoops on LSE chat that if RP spent 6p on 137 million shares it is equivalent to an out lay of £8.2 million.

[pwhite73] 01/9/2017 19:17

danyo11

I have read some of your posts on LSE Chat. You and others are wrong about the £70k limit. The £70k limit is the maximum that can be awarded for unfair dismissal. If a company does not follow the proper procedure for dismissal or accuses then dismisses a director for something he or she is not guilty of that is where the £70k limit comes in. The limit on unfair dismissal has nothing to do with a claim for loss of earnings.

For example a director may get employed on a two year contract for £300k a year. After the first week he/she is sacked after refusing to go out on a date with the Chairman. If the court rules in their favour he/she could receive the maximum award for unfair dismissal which is £70k. The award for loss of earnings could be £600k.

The two are completely different.

[danyo11] 01/9/2017 13:33

Couldn't agree more - I don't buy the whole not within AIM rules. Every CEO talks about goals, objectives, aspirations to do certain deals etc! They then release an RNS if and when it's done

[smart solution] 01/9/2017 09:13

Agree whitey - have a pop at him on Twitter mate..