
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Origo Partners Plc | LSE:OPP | London | Ordinary Share | IM00B1G3MS12 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.075 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/9/2016 09:07 | Looks like it. I was going to top up... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
16/9/2016 08:25 | which is why i suggested him being out we now might move forward. | ![]() partner | |
15/9/2016 10:46 | Ahh yes. I thought that was an over 3% interest declaration. I believe he was a seller before the suspension as well though? | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
15/9/2016 09:52 | within yesterdays RNS , previously just oner 10m . now nil. | ![]() partner | |
15/9/2016 08:23 | Where was that news? Someone bailed out just before the suspension? | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
15/9/2016 07:21 | i thought i had read that somebody has sold out , just over 10m shares , however could still be good news for the price . | ![]() partner | |
14/9/2016 20:57 | Another new holder... More bunting please... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
10/9/2016 16:23 | Lets hang the bunting out. | ![]() russman | |
09/9/2016 20:10 | Hmm, Armstrong investments have taken a position :http://armstrongim. | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
09/9/2016 15:04 | I hope their lawyers are patient... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
09/9/2016 15:02 | Don't know. I suppose that's why they grabbed half a mill back off kincora. Topped up again... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
09/9/2016 13:54 | Why did they not think of that. | ![]() russman | |
09/9/2016 13:27 | They'll have to flog one of their more liquid holdings I suppose, or borrow it... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
09/9/2016 12:06 | Where is the cash. | ![]() russman | |
09/9/2016 11:13 | Well, liquidity could be an issue, but they have that under control. They got £0.5m out of kincora and they're renegotiating the management fees... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
09/9/2016 04:33 | & dont forget the $3.5m spent on fees so far. | ![]() russman | |
08/9/2016 19:05 | Hang on. I think I've missed something here. The nav is $30m or 9 cents a share. But part of the Net, of the Net asset value, contained a provision for the preference shares in the accounts. The latest valuation of the investments was some $100m... Even if you knock off the preference share money of say $20m, there is about 20p of NAV per share, no? | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
08/9/2016 12:49 | Found this on kincora, one of the larger holdings :Kincora Copper well-positioned, as interest in Mongolia reawakensShare 11:19 13 May 2016Copper porphyries like Oyu Tolgoi tend to occur in clusters focused on key geological structures within established belts.?Oyu Tolgoi has sparked renewed interest in Mongolia's copper assetsOne of the rub-offs Rio Tinto's (LON:RIO) planned expansion of the giant Oyu Tolgoi copper mine in Mongolia  was a short run on the shares ofKincora Copper Ltd (CVE:KCC).Kincora holds large tracts of land not far away from where Rio's operations are now moving up a gear.And the thinking is that copper porphyries like Oyu Tolgoi tend to occur in clusters focused on key geological structures within established belts.This is true in the Southwest Pacific, Arizona and the wider south-western United States and the Andes, particularly in Northern Chile.That's where the world's largest mine is located and the progressive discovery of copper porphyries was central in transforming the country's economy from the 1970s onwards.Within a comparable scale landmass, and similar important arc-parallel/transve | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
08/9/2016 12:43 | Anyone with any news? Or just me chatting to myself? | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
08/9/2016 10:36 | Picked up some more today... At least worth 3p, and perhaps more. | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
07/9/2016 11:54 | And the higher the nav, the less of an issue the preference shares deal becomes? Finally, with 2 years of legal wrangling out of the way, they can wind the whole lot up without a firesale of the investments ... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
07/9/2016 11:51 | Still think this could be a bargain. 11 cents a share NAV is based in $30m. The nav in 2013 was $135m. Now I know things went pear-shaped in Mongolian resources, but Rio Tinto have just splashed the cash on a massive copper mine there, so it can't be worthless... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
07/9/2016 08:50 | Indeed. Looked pretty bleak pre-suspension, always thought a deal could be struck... We need some guidance on the latest NAV, but surely can't be any worse than the latest 11 cents a share? Didn't a large shareholder bail the day before suspension? I bet they choked on their cornflakes this morning... | ![]() zcaprd7 | |
07/9/2016 08:39 | Better than nothing. | ![]() russman |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions