Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
One Media Ip Group Plc LSE:OMIP London Ordinary Share GB00B1DRDZ07 ORD 0.5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.50 -8.33% 5.50 5.00 6.00 6.00 5.50 6.00 602,571 10:06:17
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Media 2.7 0.5 0.4 12.5 7

One Media Ip Share Discussion Threads

Showing 151 to 171 of 900 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
29/3/2013
13:10
I would be surprised if the share price falls much below 8p when introduced on AIM. What we do know is that the investing fraternity feels that a share price of 8p is reasonable. Mind you, as many of you will know, the investing fraternity is not always right! Having said that, based on profits and dividends, I believe 8p to be more than justified. But then, who am I to judge? However, I have been a holder since April, 2011.
meadow2
29/3/2013
09:59
It may well be possible to buy at 6p in the mean time. Do you think they'll start at 8p on AIM? It's possible they only open at 6-7p.
jamielein
29/3/2013
09:18
Great news! one extra thought, Will be interesting to see if shares can still be picked up around the 6-6.5p range on plus meantime! Fantastic! hashtag, ThatIsAll! :)
microscope
29/3/2013
09:14
Confirmed - couple of mistakes in docs. Corrected next week. Happy Easter. Regards, GHF
glasshalfull
28/3/2013
23:21
...or possibly another mistake in the doc! Noticed it earlier & was going to ping MI an email. Regards GHF
glasshalfull
28/3/2013
23:09
Looks like Roman Poplawsk and Nigel Smethers exchange holdings, or Nigel Smethers purchases 2,600,006 shares from Roman Poplawsk.
briangeeee
28/3/2013
22:04
I hope that One Media have words with their Nomad. It looks as though the notification date at the end of the document has the wrong year - 2012 - should it be 2013? A correction soon? Hope it doesn't delay things.
meadow2
28/3/2013
21:37
I got so excited that I posted it multiple times. This is wha happens when you use an iPhone to post a message!
jamielein
28/3/2013
21:36
Didn't expect this to become a reality so soon. Hopefully they'll attract some more interest once they start trading on AIM.
jamielein
28/3/2013
21:36
Didn't expect this to become a reality so soon. Hopefully they'll attract some more interest once they start trading on AIM.
jamielein
28/3/2013
21:34
Didn't expect this to become a reality so soon. Hopefully they'll attract some more interest once they start trading on AIM.
jamielein
28/3/2013
21:33
Didn't expect this to become a reality so soon. Hopefully they'll attract some more interest once they start trading on AIM.
jamielein
28/3/2013
20:56
All systems go for AIM listing... http://onemediaip.com/docs/aim%20schedule%201%20-%20one%20media%20ip%20group%20plc.pdf * Trading on AIM due to commence 18th April. * £750k raised with MIs stake reduced to 40% * Issue price 8p Well done MI & team. Excellent Easter pressie ;-) Regards GHF
glasshalfull
08/3/2013
14:54
Realistically OMIP is so small that its not going to make much difference, but having the confidence to move to AIM is a good sign... I think its gowth over the last few years will attract a wider ownership...Its going to be interesting to see if their video content is going to turn out to be lucrative.
capt bligh
08/3/2013
12:52
So, are you saying you'd like to see OMIP trade on SEAQ, rather that SETSmm or SETSqx? Personally I can't see a good reason for any company to trade on SEAQ.
briangeeee
08/3/2013
12:29
If the company is good enough, it will flourish - even on AIM! plenty multibaggers over the years. using a stick to put all companies in one boat, is, frankly, (finds polite word) pointless. I think this one is most certainly good enough.
microscope
08/3/2013
12:27
On the minus side... many smallish companies in SETS and big ones too, are ruthlessly hammered by clever bot systems that chew up good news and suck all momentum unless it is overwhelming. A decent broker given guidelines can usually get inside the spread.
capt bligh
08/3/2013
11:33
Paul Scott made a comment this morning about AIM, all of which I pretty much agree with. http://www.stockopedia.co.uk/content/small-cap-report-8-mar-ind-aga-cup-sco-aty-71438/ "I see that my namesake, Scotty (LON:SCO) is the latest micro cap to announce its intention to de-List from AIM, although it will remain Listed in Austria. It is interesting to read the reasons they give as to why AIM has not worked for them, and these include: Difficulty in equity fund-raising Lack of liquidity in the shares Volatile share price (due to lack of liquidity) Significant costs to remain listed on AIM No need for a dual listing given the company's small size. It seems to me that the first four points in that list are generic problems with AIM, and are caused by the archaic system of having market makers maintaining quotes for a tiny quantity of shares in AIM companies, at a ludicrously wide bid/offer spread. This just deters anyone from buying or selling the shares, unless they are desperate. Nobody benefits from this system overall. It shuts down the market in smaller company shares, so although the market makers might make a fat profit on the bid/offer spread when someone occasionally trades, most of the time the shares are just dormant with hardly any transactions. As I keep mentioning, the solution is simple and obvious - the market needs to move from a quote-driven, to an order-driven electronic order book. This SETSmm approach already exists, and works brilliantly for larger company shares. You can either get your broker to buy directly from a market maker, or if you want, you can get your broker to place an order directly on the order book at the price you would like to buy or sell at. Even better is if sophisticated investors can have direct market access (DMA) and place our own orders on the order book, by-passing market makers altogether. AIM will continue to flounder until the authorities grasp this nettle, and fix things. I'd like to see a highly liquid, electronic market, instead of the stagnant, old-fashioned system we have now, which seems designed to ensure investors are fleeced by a whole load of unnecessary middle-men. Many small cap shares would come alive if they were moved to the SETSmm order-driven system. Then more companies would list in London, the whole thing would spring into activity. Sure, there would be some vested interests who would need to find some other form of gainful employment, but they are slowly killing the small caps market at the moment, so will end up out of a job eventually anyway. Bold thinking is needed, but there seems little sign of that from the LSE, from what I can gather."
briangeeee
27/2/2013
17:50
Instead of the market makers being 4.3-4.8 and 4.6 to 5.1 as per last night,looks as though we finally have 'agreement' with them on 4.75 to 5.25. Wider spread but illusory in a sense. Nice gain today.
microscope
26/2/2013
08:57
See someone paid 5p for a good lot yesterday. Certainly seems the overhang has gone
harrogate
25/2/2013
21:59
Nope ...these warrants actually lapsed and were not replaced... They were those of an original investor who had a notifiable holding at one point , but who has lost interest
capt bligh
Chat Pages: Latest  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  1
Your Recent History
LSE
OMIP
One Media ..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200227 02:41:31