We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
One Media Ip Group Plc | OMIP | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
4.25 | 4.08 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.25 |
Industry Sector |
---|
MEDIA |
Announcement Date | Type | Currency | Dividend Amount | Ex Date | Record Date | Payment Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29/04/2024 | Final | GBP | 0.00055 | 09/05/2024 | 10/05/2024 | 28/06/2024 |
29/03/2023 | Final | GBP | 0.00055 | 06/04/2023 | 11/04/2023 | 26/05/2023 |
22/04/2022 | Final | GBP | 0.00055 | 05/05/2022 | 06/05/2022 | 10/06/2022 |
31/03/2021 | Final | GBP | 0.00055 | 15/04/2021 | 16/04/2021 | 27/05/2021 |
06/05/2020 | Interim | GBP | 0.00055 | 14/05/2020 | 15/05/2020 | 25/06/2020 |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 27/11/2024 15:19 by yump Hopefully OMIP isn’t big enough for VC parasites. They would love the idea of buying a floated business on the cheap that has assets paid for by shareholders money. Then realise the true value of the assets by selling them off on the open market. Kerching!I notice SONG was down at 60p before it closed shop and shareholders got 100p. Same sort of result here rather than being taken out, would at least not rip-off shareholders. |
Posted at 27/11/2024 08:31 by harrogate The dividend is meaningless surely. Let's get the value realised here and move on. If the board don't push for that then they are not doing their job. Allowing MI to have a lifestyle business |
Posted at 27/11/2024 08:28 by yump At least the dividend is derisked a fair bit.Perhaps now its ‘clean’, winding up would give a substantially better return than sitting around getting dividends. |
Posted at 10/7/2024 08:26 by yump I changed my mind about TCAT and think its ok to be spending on it. Omip isn’t big enough to be an income stock - its not secure enough for me to put a large sum in to get income - too risky compared to some of the large FTSE stocks. Especially when you consider the valuation issues and tricky market forces prsent in music royalties.I bought as a growth stock and it kind of morphed into something else. So for me, it makes sense to use the steady income to invest in something that might turn it into a proper growth stock. In fact that’s not a bad model when you consider the other options of placings or debt that other small floated businesses go through. Same goes for all small stocks trying to please investors with dividends. The UK needs growth stocks like never before. |
Posted at 09/7/2024 18:12 by yump Perhaps investors think that OMIP is just not big enough to be developing what appears to be a ground-breaking bit of tech. and to promote it into a serious SaaS earner.I thought it was supposed to be being used by significant labels ages ago but it took years to find out what its earnings were and they were small. It does seem over the years that its like a small personal business, where it feels great to be running it and be in touch with the industry and being positive about it, but where the reality is that its pretty insignificant. |
Posted at 06/6/2024 11:14 by yump I wonder what the value of the catalogue is in the open market. Could do what some REIT’s are doing. Return most of money to shareholders and leave us a stake in ready-to-float (in better times) TCAT. Atm regardless of dividend its stagnant money of mine ! |
Posted at 30/4/2024 09:30 by harrogate I think it would help if the Company bought back shares even at the expense of the dividend. It would be a good signal that buying them is paying 25p for something worth a pound. Anything to shake up the current complete absence of interest. Director buys might help but only if significant and not at a token level |
Posted at 29/4/2024 07:46 by harrogate The point you make is sound. The broker note states that to date £3.6m has been invested in TCAT so £4m pretty soon. And that I suspect is without costing in a lot of board time and effort.Revenues are all from trials and testing I think so not sure falling revenue accurately reflects commercial progress. But that progress has been glacial for sure. The broker note hints at merging TCAT with something else in the industry and getting back to being a music rights holder - as they state the only UK quoted example very soon. We are effectively being valued at not much over 2.5 x NPS when we have been paying over 10 x in last few years for our rights and as we say the big boys are being bought out at 15 x. IF TCAT gets taken off OMIP P&L and we can see clearly what is going on that multiple should really be materially higher but until then I don't see anything that will get us moving. To be fair to MI it is clear that a couple of years ago he wanted to offload TCAT and was stopped by the major shareholders and they had that falling out. I am well under water here ( as almost everyone must be ) and think it will stay that way until TCAT is moved on. |
Posted at 29/4/2024 07:33 by investmentguru Hmm...an odd response? I've been a member on here for 25 years and have been following OMIP for several years.Instead of making rather childish personal attacks, perhaps you could address the point I made? TCAT has had millions invested in its development over the past 5+ years, yet revenues are actually falling? It's a shame, as the main music rights business of OMIP is very sound but so much cash has been diverted into TCAT that could have been used to buy more music rights. |
Posted at 29/4/2024 06:59 by yump Nothing to see here - yet.At least I suppose the implied valuation of SONG from the takeover offers, gives the OMIP NAV some backup. Meanwhile we await the culmination of the TCAT cunning plan and hope its not a Baldrick moment. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions