Nu-oil And Gas Share Discussion Threads

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 23:34

Sapper: you say the answers to his so called questions are nothing to do with me.well if it were true they have everything to do with me and every other investor in this share! It's basically information which is at variance to what was said in the RNS!

[glenkaz] 18/10/2016 23:32

Even and even if true? What a d/ck for not posting all of it! You obviously sold out at a loss and want back in as you thought share price would tank! 🤒

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 23:26

Very convenient post for adding tomorrow lol if it falls after some gullible investors may sell after reading that post!

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 23:23

Sapper if it were true the poster would have posted the positives and its interesting the post ends with 'make of it what you will' which in my view is inserted to conjure up doubts about the company.Certainly not the post of a so called large holder who wants to instil confidence in the company!

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 23:03

Sapper he has brought this on himself by being very selective in the so called email!

[sapper2476] 18/10/2016 22:59

Thank you Sid. I have seen the complete e-mail. It is very much real and is very positive in terms of taking the company forward. I suggest some of you owe Sid an apology.

[glenkaz] 18/10/2016 22:58

Sid why not post positive part of email 🤔 Instead of bad 🤔

[sidjameslaugh] 18/10/2016 22:53

Patient investor. You come across normally as a nice chap so that is a bit out of line. The mail was in response to my questions on second placing so the rest is personal to me. Not for public forum. Again if you would like to converse pop up and e mail and I will chat.

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 22:51

The proof of the fake email is the way he has chosen to basically post info that undermines what was said in the RNS.If it was genuine he would have posted the whole email!

[glenkaz] 18/10/2016 22:48

Obviously you still have that email post it somewhere so we can see! O and positive as well! Why didn't you post that bit🤔 Don't disappear on my behalf show your proof! You can't end of ! I will mention it to me tej! By the way I don't care about company! I care about peeps loosing money! Like they did! Sp is s pittance to what it was. Gla! 🤒

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 22:45

Also Sid why not post the so called whole email with the positives included instead of posting what contradicts what the recent RNS states!

[sidjameslaugh] 18/10/2016 22:43

Glenkaz. You are an apparent big holder. I don't enjoy being slated but AIM brings out the worst in people from experience. Post your mail address and I will send you a copy of the complete email should you wish.

[jayrh] 18/10/2016 22:42

The second placing was over subscribed so they could of gone for more if they wanted... the so called email contradicts this.

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 22:42

Only an idiot holding many shares would post that email if it really was true knowing it could significantly dent his holding value (as a result gullible investors selling after reading that.

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 22:20

If the CEO really released that info he would be lying about the use of the money raised and certainly would not have said they don't anticipate raising further funds!

[goodbloke1] 18/10/2016 22:09

No way would the CEO send an email with that level of detail to a private investor which does not reflect the RNS just released.The English used is also rather pedestrian and destroys the credibility further.An obvious fake email designed to get in cheaper!

[sigora] 18/10/2016 22:04

true even if it was for wages he would defo not share that with a random shareholder would make him look a total idiot

[glenkaz] 18/10/2016 22:01

Did what a crock of sh:t! As if ceo would say that even if true! W/nker! 🤒