We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ms International Plc | LSE:MSI | London | Ordinary Share | GB0005957005 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.00 | 0.50% | 1,000.00 | 980.00 | 1,020.00 | 1,007.50 | 975.00 | 991.00 | 14,470 | 15:54:26 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Special Industry Machy, Nec | 83.96M | 4.12M | 0.2521 | 39.67 | 163.25M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
28/4/2023 15:25 | I have already added and am confident MSI will look after us. | westofengland1 | |
28/4/2023 15:07 | Definitely a seller here. Brave adding, I'm not so brave! Companies should have to report quarterly as we are completely in the dark as to how they are trading. | johndoe23 | |
28/4/2023 13:02 | Steady buying in the background on AQSE today - over 8k shares so far including a top up from me One assumes there must be a background seller too for the share price to remain dampened like this but I'm seeing it as an opportunity to accumulate in the hope £5 is a support | gleach23 | |
27/4/2023 15:52 | Thing that annoys me, a few sells and the share price tanks, a few buys and doesn't move | johndoe23 | |
27/4/2023 15:34 | I've a feeling only subscribing blues can see it as it's showing as a trade on the AQSE exchange (as opposed to LSE) along with 4 other trades (modest buys) today | gleach23 | |
27/4/2023 13:05 | Yes bought 1k shares but cannot see on ADVFN trades, not that it matters. | yasrub | |
27/4/2023 12:47 | One trade of 1k shares showing on L2, is that yours lol | johndoe23 | |
27/4/2023 11:53 | I added this morning, not currently showing - so much going on. Feels to me MSI is a little under the radar! | yasrub | |
27/4/2023 11:19 | Thanks Norbert. Definitely tempting to add at this level, surely 500p will be a floor for the sp? | johndoe23 | |
27/4/2023 11:04 | ....plus of course the Paladin VSHORAD offering.... | norbert colon | |
27/4/2023 11:02 | No problem - in Defence alone there are a nice string of different contracts underway with MSI weapons being fitted to the US Naval fleet commencing with the DDGs and USCG ships alongside fitments to the MkVI patrol boats, Indonesian Navy PC40's, Egyptian Meko A200 frigates and smaller vessels such as the Royal Navy PAC 24 Ribs. Further out into 2024-2026 we will have the RN Type 26's and Philippine Navy OPVs and corvettes so plenty to look forward to.Forks and forecourt superstructures also seemingly doing very well. | norbert colon | |
27/4/2023 10:39 | Thank you Norbert Colon for the information, the more I look at this company - half year results and contract news thereafter, there looks like multiple opportunities and the cash position mightily impressive. A little bit of patience will hopefully be well rewarded. | yasrub | |
27/4/2023 10:12 | The Seahawk weapons fitted to these MkVI boats are from MSI - hxxps://www.shephard | norbert colon | |
27/4/2023 10:05 | What's the relevance of that article to MSI? | johndoe23 | |
26/4/2023 22:55 | https://www.naval-te | norbert colon | |
12/4/2023 16:15 | Volume has been falling recently - 7k shares average per day. In the absence of news nobody buying and very few sales. Possibly still a few selling who bought back when it was tipped and going to the moon? Today over 35k shares traded. Possibly a buy order being filled. Why someone is buying, who knows? I suspect it will continue to do this in the absence of news or until the FY results in July set a new price level for better or worse? Rising sharply on large buys and then falling gently on a drizzle of smaller sells. cheers, | illiswilgig | |
12/4/2023 15:27 | Let's hope a new contract or something similar | johndoe23 | |
12/4/2023 15:05 | Hopefully news to follow | battlebus2 | |
12/4/2023 14:01 | Why the rise today? | hybrasil | |
07/4/2023 11:20 | Looking at skynex, many of its parts seem to be fairly static, and one thing the Ukrainian war has shown is that static targets are more easily taken out than in previous conflicts.And given its relatively short range it could not be placed near to the front line to eliminate battlefield drones whereas a truck based system can (esp when it costs a lot less). Himars with a fast fire and scoot technique has proved better than traditional m777's in evading the enemy.Have any been installed yet ? It would be interesting to know the setup time. That was a big unexpected issue with Rapier in the Falklands. But for many countries skynex will provide great demos and bigger commissions:-) | fft | |
07/4/2023 08:58 | Yes fair point. | norbert colon | |
07/4/2023 08:03 | That is not apples to apples because skynex is a sophisticated system fleet purchase not an individual piece. hxxps://www.rheinmet | aublune | |
07/4/2023 05:48 | Almost USD 100m each for Skynex compared to less than USD 5m (perhaps as little as USD 2.5m) for MSI's VSHORAD offering so a big difference in cost. | norbert colon | |
07/4/2023 05:09 | Just done a quick check. Rheinmetall says their gun system has an effective range of 4000m, and MSI only claims 2000m for the VSHORAD.Be interesting to see how they are used. Individually for defending specific targets ? Or daisy chained to protect a 'front' or city ? | fft | |
07/4/2023 04:58 | Missile systems against drones is very expensive. It can cost 50-100k per missile Vs a few 1000 for the drone. When drones were rare, it might have made sense, but against 'swarms' or the dozens of battlefield drones being used, I find it hard to see how the logistics work.A 'simple' 30mm shell on the other hand comes in bulk. A drone does not need to be actually hit. Proximity shells will easily cause enough damage. I would suspect only 3-5 shells per drone will be needed given the relatively slow speed. The truck can be easily resupplied but should have enough ammo for a sustained deployment.Obviously the big question is range and the need to place the trucks in locations where the drones are ;-). But, the cost is not that high if I remember so mass deployment should be possible once they are proven to kill drones within there effective range. It should also act as a deterrent against low flying aircraft. | fft |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions