Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Mediazest Plc LSE:MDZ London Ordinary Share GB00B064NT52 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 0.19p 0.18p 0.20p 0.19p 0.19p 0.19p 0 07:48:23
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Media 3.0 -0.1 -0.0 - 2.36

Mediazest (MDZ) Latest News

Mediazest News

Date Time Source Headline
15/12/201716:04PRNUSMediaZest Plc - Holding(s) in Company
15/12/201716:04UKREGMediaZest Plc Holding(s) in Company
15/12/201710:19ALNCMediaZest Interim Results Weaker On Project Delays, Targets Profit
15/12/201707:42ALNCFAlliance News Flash Headline
15/12/201707:00PRNUSMediaZest Plc - Half-year Report
15/12/201707:00UKREGMediaZest Plc Half-year Report
07/12/201716:57PRNUSMediaZest Plc - Holding(s) in Company
07/12/201716:57UKREGMediaZest Plc Holding(s) in Company
06/12/201715:05PRNUSMediaZest Plc - Holding(s) in Company
06/12/201715:05UKREGMediaZest Plc Holding(s) in Company
More Mediazest News
Mediazest Takeover Rumours

Mediazest (MDZ) Share Charts

1 Year Mediazest Chart

1 Year Mediazest Chart

1 Month Mediazest Chart

1 Month Mediazest Chart

Intraday Mediazest Chart

Intraday Mediazest Chart

Mediazest (MDZ) Discussions and Chat

Mediazest (MDZ) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Mediazest trades in real-time

Mediazest (MDZ) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
22/1/2018
08:20
Mediazest Daily Update: Mediazest Plc is listed in the Media sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker MDZ. The last closing price for Mediazest was 0.19p.
Mediazest Plc has a 4 week average price of 0.18p and a 12 week average price of 0.09p.
The 1 year high share price is 0.27p while the 1 year low share price is currently 0.08p.
There are currently 1,239,757,774 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 4,566,441 shares. The market capitalisation of Mediazest Plc is £2,355,539.77.
21/12/2017
15:10
counting cards: courtesy of RKBeekeeper from LSE Some basic facts. Current market capt at £2.6 million (£0.0021) and at the recent low in September market capt about £0.99 million. Ian Hallett owns 20% (as per last Fridays RNS) so his stake is currently worth about £520,698 (this is over 50% of our market capt at our low point in September. When did Ian Hallett first TR1? 27/11/17 with 4.37% and shares acquired about 0.11 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 29/11/17 with 5.84% and shares acquired about 0.11 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 01/12/17 (but shares acquired on 30/11/17) with 7.68% and shares acquired about 0.11 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 06/12/17 with 10.22% and shares acquired about 0.13 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 07/12/17 (but shares acquired on 06/12/17 see below) with 11.52% and shares acquired about 0.13 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 15/12/17 with 20% and shares acquired up to about 0.24 I am looking at when the TRI was RSN’d and when a particular threshold was crossed. The first TRI on 27/11/17 is RSN’d at 14:59 and the shares were purchased on the day. I conclude Ian Hallett wanted to fire an initial warning to the Current BOD. Then the next TR1 is RSN’d on 29/11/17 after hours on the day but this is a physiological threshold that has been crossed as he was now over 5%. Could it have been communicated to BOD before the close and BOD had to decide what they were going to do and needed time to think? Next TR1 is RSN’d on 1/12/17 at 10:50am but the TR1 was crossed the previous day and BOD notified the previous day, but they do not let the market know till later the next day and not at 7am. This seems unusual as it now is starting to appear the BOD are delaying issuing the RNS for about 3 hours. There could be a perfectly good reason for this delay (so Mr H can continue to top-up?) Next TR1 is RNS’d on 6/12/17 at 15:05 and the shares were acquired that day. So Mr H is letting the BOD and the world know he is building but the price is not moving up, strange that you can acquire 10.22% and share price does not move. It almost seems like Mr H and BOD want us to know he is building but nobody is taking any notice. Next TR1 is RNS’d on 7/12/17 at 16:57 but strangely Mr H crossed this threshold on the previous day but Mr H did not notify BOD till the 7th. Could he be getting frustrated with Current BOD? Next TR1 is RNS’d on15/12/17 at 16:04 and he now controls 20%. What does all this mean? On the 15/12/17 at 7am our Interim Results were issued. I conclude Mr H was looking to get on BOD and he has been prevented so he has taken a substantial position of 20% and will I expect be in negotiations. Footnote: When was Ian Hallett appointed to his current position? 7/12/16 (Regus Management Ltd) and what is unusual about this company? They take 9 months to file at Companies House when a director resigns. Has Ian Hallett resigned on 7/12/17? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/02307313/officers
15/12/2017
11:05
stephen2010: Check out ALBA. Huge multibag potential. ALBA currently trading at 0.39p target price 6p making a nice 15 bagger. Please read the following: MARKET CAP PUZZLE ❖ Alba (market cap £8.4m) is in a resources neighbourhood populated with listed companies with much enhanced market capitalisations, such as UKOG.L (£134m) and JAY.L (£172m). With either shared project interests or adjacent tenements to these companies, Alba should trade at a much higher valuation than its current token value. Like Bluejay, Alba owns 100% of its ilmenite project. Direct comparisons with UKOG are also instructive. While both companies own other projects, UKOG’s 49.9% of Horse Hill Developments Limited (HHDL), when compared to Alba’s 18.1% means that Alba has approximately one third of the value of Horse Hill compared to UKOG but only about 7% of the market capitalisation. Once the market recognises these disparities, the room for growth in Alba’s share price is undeniable. VALUATION RATIONALE - Our valuation in this First Equity Limited initiation note uses a risked valuation approach for Alba’s two main projects, at Horse Hill and TBS. The Horse Hill licences are valued using independent published technical data from Schlumberger, Xodus and Nutech on the oil potential of the licences, along with our own assumptions on recovery rates, oil discovery value, resource and development risks factors. From this a risked value of $127m net to Alba on a ‘Base Case’ basis is derived for Horse Hill. Given the similar geology and economic potential of both TBS and Dundas, we have adopted a risked closeology valuation approach, by computing an NPV for Dundas of $223m and then applying a three-tiered risked probability calculation to arrive at a value of $54.7m for TBS. Once Alba announce its JORC resource and exploration target at TBS and Bluejay its Feasibility Study results, this number is likely to be revised upwards very rapidly, possibly up to $200m, representing up to 7p per share in additional shareholder value. We compute a valuation of $185m (£139m) for Alba, equating to 6.0p per share, of which 4.1p is attributed to the stake in Horse Hill, 1.8p for TBS. Given this analysis and wealth of valuation catalysts anticipated across the project portfolio in the coming months, we recommend the shares as a ‘BUY, with a Target Price of 6.0p, representing a potential 15 times plus uplift from the current share price.
07/12/2017
07:22
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: You can't beat ADVFN. This is the tip for 2018. Why? Because the share price is going up! Is Hallet really going for a takeover. Who knows. If O'Neill/CCCAL can be removed somehow you'll save 100K per year and the company may not be far away from profitability. But the current market cap is way too high to make this a serious investment. If Peter Jones was confronted with this as an investment in Dragon's Den he'd have a long hard laugh at the valuation.
31/10/2017
11:59
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: knicol4630 Oct '17 - 13:13 - 622 of 623 0 0 been coming alive over last few days of trading so hoping for a positive trading update soon The problem is they always release a positive trading update. They've been doing it for a decade. However they are horribly misleading. Just look at the share price for proof.
22/8/2017
11:42
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: It's impossible it can be cost. The share price has been nowhere near 0.0325p ever. Not even close. I'm not interested in asking O'Neill anything. I shouldn't have to anyway since it should be explained in the accounts.
17/8/2017
08:28
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: The following is based on the assumption EP&F still hold 26,448,571 shares in Mediazest. That's the last declared shareholding and their has been no announcement of them reducing. at end Dec 2015 EP&F are valuing their Mediazest shares at 0.05 pence (against 0.17 p share price) at end Dec 2016 EP&F are valuing their Mediazest shares at 0.0325 pence (against 0.115p share price) In May 2016 O'Neill/CCCAL controlled Mediazest raised £250,000 @ 0.15p but the book value of the shares in the accounts of O'Neill/CCCAL controlled EP&F at the end of Dec 2016 was only 0.0325 pence despite a then 0.115p mediazest share price. This will certainly explain why EP&F have stopped taking part in the Mediazest placings. They would be faced with an almost immediate massive mark-down on the value of their shares. It makes you wonder how on earth mediazest have been getting these placings away, Note the above is based on the assumption EP&F still hold 26,448,571 in mediazest. The only alternative is almost as unpalatable. That is they have been selling down their shareholding - but with O'Neill director of both companies surely this would have to be announced?
16/8/2017
15:24
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: Russman, That was quick work. Did that come direct from EP&F? You have to wonder why no notes in the accounts to explain. OK assuming EP&F still hold their 26 million odd shares the math works, more or less, for year end 2015 in that 0.05 pence is about right. That's bad enough but for year end 2016 EP&F are valuing MDZ shares at only 0.0323 pence. Now that's one heck of a haircut compared to the current 0.11p share price.
03/8/2017
23:09
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: It looks like Lance O'Neill's EP&F capital, have sold down their stake in Mediazest. I've received the EP&F accounts to the year-end 30 December 2016 and the book value of their Mediazest investment is noted as only £8,566. EP&F's last declarable shareholding in Mediazest is 26,448,571 shares. The share price of Mediazest at 30 Dec was 0.11p so you'd have expected the book value to be £29,000. The implication is they have reduced to 7.8 million shares at 30 Dec 2016. CCCAL are the major shareholder of EP&F.
09/5/2017
13:54
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: There was news out last month on this. It's a one-off and was commissioned by Four by Two who presumably subcontracted out to the likes of Mediazest who put up some displays and touch screens etc. It's very surprising a local one-off like this can put 30% on the share price. I would be surprised if the shares don't fall back when reality hits. hxxp://www.essentialretail.com/news/article/59020d9799b8b-digital-studio-b-bank-opens-in-kensington Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banking Group has opened a one-off innovation lab, called Studio B, to help customers create new ways of thinking about money and how it affects their lives. The lab, based at 150 Kensington High Street, has been designed by Four by Two. The agency was commissioned to create a truly omnichannel experience that mixed on- and offline communication.
03/3/2017
12:07
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: I think I'm allowed to be sceptical given what has happened to shareholders here over the years. A few years ago the news released today would have put 50% on the share price. However it's obvious no-one takes these blatantly rampy updates seriously anymore. They've heard the same stuff a dozen times over the years and they know what's almost certainly coming round the corner. More losses and a placing. Assuming the opaque offshore vehicle CCCAL ,and Lance O'Neill, are one and the same, and I don't see how any sensible investor can assume otherwise, it's obvious where the motivation is to keep this thing going. CCCAL's loan has been paid down over the last few years mainly from proceeds of placings however it's still substantial and they'll want their money back before the music stops. Also if you assume standard non-executive director rates and hours worked, then O'Neill is being paid about 1 grand per day for his work at MDZ. That's despite O'Neill being an ever present at the company when it IPOed, and an investment at the IPO stage has resulted in a 99.7% loss. Even investors in the latest placing last year are down 30% and are no doubt bracing for the next one. This is a serial loss-making business with a substantial negative working capital position relative to its market cap. On a risk/reward basis it looks an extremely poor investment proposition. Good luck with your investment.
Mediazest share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:31 V: D:20180123 04:14:29