Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Mediazest Plc LSE:MDZ London Ordinary Share GB00B064NT52 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.015p -11.54% 0.115p 9,570,404 11:32:39
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
0.11p 0.12p 0.13p 0.115p 0.13p
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Media 3.01 -0.15 -0.01 1.5

Mediazest (MDZ) Latest News

More Mediazest News
Mediazest Takeover Rumours

Mediazest (MDZ) Share Charts

1 Year Mediazest Chart

1 Year Mediazest Chart

1 Month Mediazest Chart

1 Month Mediazest Chart

Intraday Mediazest Chart

Intraday Mediazest Chart

Mediazest (MDZ) Discussions and Chat

Mediazest (MDZ) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
10:30:270.124,584,4115,317.92O
09:21:010.124,173,1485,011.95O
07:57:410.12812,845976.23O
2018-07-17 15:13:390.124,173,1485,011.95O
2018-07-17 14:40:580.1212,00014.41O
View all Mediazest trades in real-time

Mediazest (MDZ) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
18/7/2018
09:20
Mediazest Daily Update: Mediazest Plc is listed in the Media sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker MDZ. The last closing price for Mediazest was 0.13p.
Mediazest Plc has a 4 week average price of 0.10p and a 12 week average price of 0.10p.
The 1 year high share price is 0.27p while the 1 year low share price is currently 0.08p.
There are currently 1,286,757,774 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 2,935,741 shares. The market capitalisation of Mediazest Plc is £1,479,771.44.
11/6/2018
13:50
andre: He is obviously not buying into the Lance dream anymore. This will be costing him a packet to get out of. Paper losses becoming crystalised. The share price will tank if he keeps selling which will make raising funds harder.
11/6/2018
12:22
dave4545: Not a good time to announce a potential big seller in a market devoid of buyers. Already hammering the share price
08/3/2018
17:12
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: The current market cap of £2.4M defies belief. If you add on the £1M in net current liabilites you have an effective valuation of £3.4M which is absolutely ludicrous. The last valuation by EP&F in their accounts, another company controlled by LanceO'Neill/CCCAL, was at a share price of 0.0325p. Even that is far too high but at least it's closer to fair value.
15/2/2018
11:46
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: It could be Ian Hallett refused to put any significant money in. Whatever, it's a "keep the lights on placing" as Shareprophets have reported. They reiterate their bargepole rating. MediaZest – at 3:31pm “pleased to announce” a placing… because it keeps the lights on? By Steve Moore | Wednesday 14 February 2018 If you like this, please share this article using the buttons below Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Creative media agency and audio-visual systems company MediaZest (MDZ) “is pleased to announce that it has conditionally raised £70,000 (before expenses) through a placing… at a price of 0.15p per ordinary share”. Hmmm, a ‘keep the lights on’ placing then? The company states it to “fully take advantage of two specific, recently won opportunities, and others that are still at the pitch or negotiation stage” and for “strategic growth opportunities” that it believes should be explored. It adds it “continues to grow its contracted recurring revenue base and the board anticipates announcing a significant increase in this year on year with the 31 March 2018 results”, but also that “further to the announcement of Mediazest’s interim results on 15 December 2017, the group continues to make progress and is in advanced negotiations on several material contracts. The timing of the closure of these contracts will have an effect on the year end results as referred to in that announcement”. Hmmm. But it’s two months closer to the year-end from then, and now less than 7 weeks away – and results for the first half of the year showed a loss of £0.15 million (2016: £0.07 million) on lower revenue of £1.3 million (prior full-year: loss of £0.14 million on revenue of £3 million). The balance sheet showed cash of £0.10 million and net current liabilities of £0.95 million – though the company now also argues it “is aware of the dilutive nature of any fundraising at the current share price and as such has limited the amount raised”?. With the shares having declined from comfortably above 0.20p at the start of 2018 to close at 0.165p on Monday, it still only able to be got away at 0.15p though? Overall, the half-year financial situation and track record see me very wary here – and the shares remain on the bargepole list. D_Stone • a day ago This is pure and simply a lifestyle company. It's CEO has never been aligned with the owners. His remit seems to be to keep all the parasites well replenished and not shareholder value. Things must be getting close to its eventual departure from AIM as this must be one of the lowest placings I've ever come across.
14/2/2018
10:28
hazl: I disagree with your initial comments. The placing was not at a dissimilar price to the current price and recurring revenue sounds good as well as the comments about expectations in March announcement. 'Further to the announcement of Mediazest’s interim results on 15 December 2017, the Group continues to make progress and is in advanced negotiations on several material contracts. The timing of the closure of these contracts will have an effect on the year end results as referred to in that announcement. In addition, the Company continues to grow its contracted recurring revenue base and the Board anticipates announcing a significant increase in this year on year with the 31 March 2018 results. The reasons for the placing are hence twofold. Reasons for the Placing 'The Company is becoming more focussed on dealing with large, complex global organisations. This has led to a need to keep a proportion of operating cashflow earmarked for deposit purposes with suppliers. In order to fully take advantage of two specific, recently won opportunities, and others that are still at the pitch or negotiation stage, the Board has decided to execute this small fundraise to meet these requirements. In addition, the Digital Signage market continues to grow and with the ongoing improvement in Group performance, the Board believes that there are strategic growth opportunities that should be explored and an element of the Placing funds will be set aside for this purpose. The Board is aware of the dilutive nature of any fundraising at the current share price and as such has limited the amount raised to cover these two requirements only, with a handful of existing long term shareholders..'
21/12/2017
15:10
counting cards: courtesy of RKBeekeeper from LSE Some basic facts. Current market capt at £2.6 million (£0.0021) and at the recent low in September market capt about £0.99 million. Ian Hallett owns 20% (as per last Fridays RNS) so his stake is currently worth about £520,698 (this is over 50% of our market capt at our low point in September. When did Ian Hallett first TR1? 27/11/17 with 4.37% and shares acquired about 0.11 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 29/11/17 with 5.84% and shares acquired about 0.11 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 01/12/17 (but shares acquired on 30/11/17) with 7.68% and shares acquired about 0.11 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 06/12/17 with 10.22% and shares acquired about 0.13 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 07/12/17 (but shares acquired on 06/12/17 see below) with 11.52% and shares acquired about 0.13 Next TR1? From Ian Hallett 15/12/17 with 20% and shares acquired up to about 0.24 I am looking at when the TRI was RSN’d and when a particular threshold was crossed. The first TRI on 27/11/17 is RSN’d at 14:59 and the shares were purchased on the day. I conclude Ian Hallett wanted to fire an initial warning to the Current BOD. Then the next TR1 is RSN’d on 29/11/17 after hours on the day but this is a physiological threshold that has been crossed as he was now over 5%. Could it have been communicated to BOD before the close and BOD had to decide what they were going to do and needed time to think? Next TR1 is RSN’d on 1/12/17 at 10:50am but the TR1 was crossed the previous day and BOD notified the previous day, but they do not let the market know till later the next day and not at 7am. This seems unusual as it now is starting to appear the BOD are delaying issuing the RNS for about 3 hours. There could be a perfectly good reason for this delay (so Mr H can continue to top-up?) Next TR1 is RNS’d on 6/12/17 at 15:05 and the shares were acquired that day. So Mr H is letting the BOD and the world know he is building but the price is not moving up, strange that you can acquire 10.22% and share price does not move. It almost seems like Mr H and BOD want us to know he is building but nobody is taking any notice. Next TR1 is RNS’d on 7/12/17 at 16:57 but strangely Mr H crossed this threshold on the previous day but Mr H did not notify BOD till the 7th. Could he be getting frustrated with Current BOD? Next TR1 is RNS’d on15/12/17 at 16:04 and he now controls 20%. What does all this mean? On the 15/12/17 at 7am our Interim Results were issued. I conclude Mr H was looking to get on BOD and he has been prevented so he has taken a substantial position of 20% and will I expect be in negotiations. Footnote: When was Ian Hallett appointed to his current position? 7/12/16 (Regus Management Ltd) and what is unusual about this company? They take 9 months to file at Companies House when a director resigns. Has Ian Hallett resigned on 7/12/17? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/02307313/officers
15/12/2017
11:05
stephen2010: Check out ALBA. Huge multibag potential. ALBA currently trading at 0.39p target price 6p making a nice 15 bagger. Please read the following: MARKET CAP PUZZLE ❖ Alba (market cap £8.4m) is in a resources neighbourhood populated with listed companies with much enhanced market capitalisations, such as UKOG.L (£134m) and JAY.L (£172m). With either shared project interests or adjacent tenements to these companies, Alba should trade at a much higher valuation than its current token value. Like Bluejay, Alba owns 100% of its ilmenite project. Direct comparisons with UKOG are also instructive. While both companies own other projects, UKOG’s 49.9% of Horse Hill Developments Limited (HHDL), when compared to Alba’s 18.1% means that Alba has approximately one third of the value of Horse Hill compared to UKOG but only about 7% of the market capitalisation. Once the market recognises these disparities, the room for growth in Alba’s share price is undeniable. VALUATION RATIONALE - Our valuation in this First Equity Limited initiation note uses a risked valuation approach for Alba’s two main projects, at Horse Hill and TBS. The Horse Hill licences are valued using independent published technical data from Schlumberger, Xodus and Nutech on the oil potential of the licences, along with our own assumptions on recovery rates, oil discovery value, resource and development risks factors. From this a risked value of $127m net to Alba on a ‘Base Case’ basis is derived for Horse Hill. Given the similar geology and economic potential of both TBS and Dundas, we have adopted a risked closeology valuation approach, by computing an NPV for Dundas of $223m and then applying a three-tiered risked probability calculation to arrive at a value of $54.7m for TBS. Once Alba announce its JORC resource and exploration target at TBS and Bluejay its Feasibility Study results, this number is likely to be revised upwards very rapidly, possibly up to $200m, representing up to 7p per share in additional shareholder value. We compute a valuation of $185m (£139m) for Alba, equating to 6.0p per share, of which 4.1p is attributed to the stake in Horse Hill, 1.8p for TBS. Given this analysis and wealth of valuation catalysts anticipated across the project portfolio in the coming months, we recommend the shares as a ‘BUY, with a Target Price of 6.0p, representing a potential 15 times plus uplift from the current share price.
07/12/2017
07:22
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: You can't beat ADVFN. This is the tip for 2018. Why? Because the share price is going up! Is Hallet really going for a takeover. Who knows. If O'Neill/CCCAL can be removed somehow you'll save 100K per year and the company may not be far away from profitability. But the current market cap is way too high to make this a serious investment. If Peter Jones was confronted with this as an investment in Dragon's Den he'd have a long hard laugh at the valuation.
31/10/2017
11:59
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: knicol4630 Oct '17 - 13:13 - 622 of 623 0 0 been coming alive over last few days of trading so hoping for a positive trading update soon The problem is they always release a positive trading update. They've been doing it for a decade. However they are horribly misleading. Just look at the share price for proof.
17/8/2017
09:28
frjdnverijtnhj8568934: The following is based on the assumption EP&F still hold 26,448,571 shares in Mediazest. That's the last declared shareholding and their has been no announcement of them reducing. at end Dec 2015 EP&F are valuing their Mediazest shares at 0.05 pence (against 0.17 p share price) at end Dec 2016 EP&F are valuing their Mediazest shares at 0.0325 pence (against 0.115p share price) In May 2016 O'Neill/CCCAL controlled Mediazest raised £250,000 @ 0.15p but the book value of the shares in the accounts of O'Neill/CCCAL controlled EP&F at the end of Dec 2016 was only 0.0325 pence despite a then 0.115p mediazest share price. This will certainly explain why EP&F have stopped taking part in the Mediazest placings. They would be faced with an almost immediate massive mark-down on the value of their shares. It makes you wonder how on earth mediazest have been getting these placings away, Note the above is based on the assumption EP&F still hold 26,448,571 in mediazest. The only alternative is almost as unpalatable. That is they have been selling down their shareholding - but with O'Neill director of both companies surely this would have to be announced?
Mediazest share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
add chat code
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:43 V: D:20180718 10:52:37