Leo Insurance Share Discussion Threads

[double6] 01/2/2010 09:35

Online 2.25/2.4

[double6] 01/2/2010 09:28

Tiny buy pushed the online bid up to over 2p.

[double6] 01/2/2010 09:23

Actual spread 1.875/2.25.

[jamie62] 01/2/2010 09:21

50% spread.....

[tara7] 01/2/2010 09:01

Have a good idea the overhang has gone on Fri, [or just about gone]. MM can delay a huge trade for a while.

[double6] 01/2/2010 08:58

(Actual online spread 1.875/2.25)

[tara7] 29/1/2010 16:07

Market cap now £112,000 but in my view not for long.!!

[tara7] 29/1/2010 14:58

Whats your deal then?

[tara7] 29/1/2010 14:58

Whats your deal then?

[solarno lopez] 29/1/2010 14:56

and you forget about the costs of doing such a deal Lawyers, accountants and Nomads do not come cheap as i am currently finding out

[tara7] 29/1/2010 14:46

solarno, not a ramp, you seem to not understand, at £160,000 you get an AIM listing, and huge upside if they make a profit or do a deal. this is NOT a BP, or VOD.!!! For you stay away, good luck in any event. On a pe of 10 LEO needs to make just £16,000 profit.!!!!!!!!!!!!

[solarno lopez] 29/1/2010 14:40

the point is their track record is not as good as you are ramping they DO abandon companies and their shareholders

[tara7] 29/1/2010 14:33

Looks like wins may have taken the last of the overhang on board, or made a big sale and is about to buy the stock in. Might have to wait till 4.30 for trades.

[tara7] 29/1/2010 08:23

How right you are , but the only one they have kept is LEO, why is that then.??

[solarno lopez] 29/1/2010 08:22

and brought a number of shells to market did nothing and lost the quote

[tara7] 28/1/2010 15:38

Good on you mate, its brave punters like you who make the quid, just cos others are selling does not meat has gone off.!! Done it myself time and time again.

[kennyruss] 28/1/2010 15:08

boomorbust...

you know what, it leo delists or whatever, it won't really matter in my bigger picture. I am speculating and have taken a position..

if its not your cup of tea...go away...

bit like I took a position in MHG - seller around, stock oversold, jumped in and picked up almost 5% of company



you pays your money and you take your chance

Kenny

[tara7] 28/1/2010 13:24

One thing that i know is i own shares in AGL. That is a fact. you are saying that i am telling a lie. I do not like what you say, and would be happy if you changed your wording please.

[boomorbust] 28/1/2010 13:18

lol ramptastic tara - Here are your stats for AGL

3 weeks prior to results - 18 post per day on average 126 posts per week
1 week post results - 0.71 posts per day on average 5 posts per week

LOL you haven't sold out!!!!!!

I will not be buying LEO and I will be highlighting to all what a pump and dumper you are

[tara7] 28/1/2010 13:08

boomorbust, I do post on the AGL board,and intend to for the next 10 years. I can see you do not like LEO, and should not buy LEO shares. Thats fine by me, and as you can see above Kennyruss also takes my view. Great thing about this BB is we see all posts, i ban no one, good or bad. good luck in what ever you do, [might want to put your cash in the bank.]

[boomorbust] 28/1/2010 11:38

ramptastic tara. of course you still own AGL that is why you never post there anymore and why for the 3 weeks before results you were posting 20+ posts per day. Back to Leo. WHY is it still trading? Becasue it is being supported by safeland - that is the only reason it is still a going concern. The £65k Redeemable prefs were due to be repaid last year but safeland defered them, they also owe £12k to safeland as their creditor. Why? Becasue it is not in safelands interest not to support them coz they will never get their money back.
kennyruss, well there is one born....

[kennyruss] 28/1/2010 09:46

boomorbust...

I can make my own investment decisions tahnkyou...

I fully understand what is going on here, and I am extremely happy with my position.

[tara7] 28/1/2010 08:59

Boomorbust, first, i hold AGL shares. Might like to note that no large holders of AGL have sold out.!!! Plus note new investor over 3% in AGL. Back to LEO. One has in my view to buy stocks that our unloved thats what i do. Here is just about the cheapest stock on the LSE again you fail to tell us WHY it is still trading, not de listed. Why, why, why. Of All my threads just one stock has gone bust, many have 5, 10 and 20 bagged, so i know what i am doing and unlike many others its on the BB for all to see. Yes you are right any share can go bust inc huge banks, however in my view a good selection of shares like LEO, over the long term could buy you a house for a tiny investment. Good luck in any event.

[boomorbust] 28/1/2010 08:37

lol ramptastic tara. The company has negative assets and hasnt had a positive net asset base for years so it is still worth err negative.
The Lipmans havent done very well lately have they and they have made a lot of small investors rather poor lately, havent they.
The city knows that this is duff thats why they are rescuing some of the stupid money they put in. Maybe they paid so much because some young city boy thought it was a good idea to follw property and related support services.
AGL, its your share of the decade, right you sold out. Thats why you were posting 20+ times a day for months prior to results and have now conspicuous by your abscence.
You also obviously dont know how these placements work. The directors will put the money in at a ridiculous low share price to make sure they look after themselves. All other shareholders will be screwed

[tara7] 28/1/2010 08:29

Boomorbust, thankyou for you post, please take a look at the Lipmans track record with Aim Companies they made some small investors rather rich. Net Liabilities of 71k is as you know a tiny amount. RE AGL that is my share of the decade, and please pop in in a few months /years time to see how it is doing. RE LEO, please tell us why the city paid 12 times todays price for Leo shares based on the same thread, ie a company that will grow very fast if a deal is done. You point out about dilution of the stock, but you fail to mention that if that was going to be the case then the directors shares would also be worth very little, so what would be the point.??