We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leeds Group Plc | LSE:LDSG | London | Ordinary Share | GB0005100606 | ORD 12P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 10.00 | 9.00 | 11.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 07:37:27 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Textile Goods, Nec | 27.82M | -840k | -0.0307 | -3.26 | 2.73M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
26/1/2004 15:39 | Loads of small selling today but the price hasn't moved much, in fact the offer seems to have gone up so perhaps there is a buyer waiting? If there is some bad news to come I wonder what it could be. Hopefully not another bad debt at Leeds Leasing. Or maybe the U.K. Dyeing division has died and they won't get to cash in those loan notes. Just have to wait and see I guess. Arthur | arthur_lame_stocks | |
26/1/2004 08:27 | 11 trades already today in a stock that trade very seldom. Has it been written up anywhere. Anyone know? | langland | |
31/12/2003 07:49 | or possibly 32.5 pence | langland | |
31/12/2003 07:27 | should have read 32.5 adjusted for the capital repayment !!!! | cg1953 | |
31/12/2003 00:26 | Not quite as bad as it seems? CHESIL356 - 1 Oct'03 - 22:02 - 105 of 115 edit Just to expand a bit on what langland said as i see it.If an investor was to have bought back in may at 35p and held the share they would have recieved a special dividend of 13p for every share they owned .After the special divedend was paid the share price would have been reduced imediatly(as it did)to reflect the new value of the company so to get a fair comparrission between now and then you need to add 13p to todays price, to not do so is mis-leading.IMO | chesil356 | |
30/12/2003 23:38 | Down from 36p - 18p in 6 Months ! What an absolutly cracking investment. | ianmacg | |
20/12/2003 09:48 | stefield. pg liked 'yor' . they then collapsed !!!! trouble is that ldsg has consistently given bad news these past few years whether it be employee fraud[4m], problems divesting of its textile bizneses or now the 'new core growth leasing bizness' experiencing problems. something all ways seems to be going wrong with this company !!! caveat emptor | cg1953 | |
20/12/2003 08:09 | its all gone quiet on here. at least our friend P.G. seems to like the results !! | stefield | |
26/10/2003 10:10 | The sad thing with TW's tip is that Leeds was a really good investment about a year ago when you could have bought for 14p and got the 13p special dividend. TW is way way way behind the game on this one. Arthur | arthur_lame_stocks | |
01/10/2003 23:23 | Just a thought! Nice "tip" in May to receive special divi, then immediately sell shares before fall. I don't know if that would have been possible though! As above, "Just a thought"! | denimag | |
01/10/2003 23:09 | Doesn't seem to mention it in the latest tip (Which is reproduced in the BB header) which is a bit misleading in my opinion. | chesil356 | |
01/10/2003 22:55 | Chesil & langland, Thanks for that! I was unaware of the special divi pay out. Was it mentioned in all the blurb from TW? I do not hold shares in Leeds Group. | denimag | |
01/10/2003 22:23 | CHESIL - your right funny how they forgot to mention that point so the share looks like a big recovery play.. | chicken | |
01/10/2003 22:02 | Just to expand a bit on what langland said as i see it.If an investor was to have bought back in may at 35p and held the share they would have recieved a special dividend of 13p for every share they owned .After the special divedend was paid the share price would have been reduced imediatly(as it did)to reflect the new value of the company so to get a fair comparrission between now and then you need to add 13p to todays price, to not do so is mis-leading.IMO The point is obvious. | chesil356 | |
01/10/2003 21:41 | and the point is? | denimag | |
01/10/2003 21:37 | I think you need to take this into account? langland - 29 Sep'03 - 22:20 - 78 of 102 Incredible the misinformation on this thread. Denimag, the shares were mid 30's in May and are now ex the capital return. So, if you want to compare the price now to the price then, add 13p to the current price. Royal TRader, if the year end is 30 Sep, how can the results be out tomorrow? Anyone else got some stupid points to make? | chesil356 | |
30/9/2003 21:02 | I am putting winny and his boys on trial on advfn, as I have heard a lot of bad things about him since hs first tip: Express your views at: | royal trader | |
30/9/2003 20:21 | We have unsubscribed you from UK-Analyst this morning and look forward to never hearing from you again Tom" LUV IT! | chicken |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions