ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

KOD Kodal Minerals Plc

0.345
-0.005 (-1.43%)
20 Dec 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Kodal Minerals Plc LSE:KOD London Ordinary Share GB00BH3X7Y70 ORD 0.03125P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.005 -1.43% 0.345 0.33 0.36 0.35 0.345 0.35 38,418,173 08:22:14
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Misc Nonmtl Minrls, Ex Fuels 0 27.19M 0.0013 2.62 70.84M
Kodal Minerals Plc is listed in the Misc Nonmtl Minrls, Ex Fuels sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker KOD. The last closing price for Kodal Minerals was 0.35p. Over the last year, Kodal Minerals shares have traded in a share price range of 0.26p to 0.665p.

Kodal Minerals currently has 20,241,116,260 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Kodal Minerals is £70.84 million. Kodal Minerals has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 2.62.

Kodal Minerals Share Discussion Threads

Showing 25901 to 25924 of 26975 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1043  1042  1041  1040  1039  1038  1037  1036  1035  1034  1033  1032  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
26/8/2024
12:17
Not on this chat board you moron 😂
trolls and co
26/8/2024
07:23
elco, first lithium have exploration permits which when they applied to renew got shoved onto new code. All mining operations have been asked to submit their paperwork to the govt for upgrade. No chance kodal will be the only company exempt.
dazaliam
26/8/2024
04:54
mercman, not all ore is amenable to dms processing. Just because the MRE increased to 30Mt doesnt necessarily increase LOM. Most ore requires the use of flotation to liberate the spod. kodal cant afford flotation capex for stage 2 until after 4 yrs making bucket loads on stage 1 (DOH). The original idea of going dms only was to benefit from high sc prices, well that failed didnt it?
dazaliam
25/8/2024
19:19
If anyone is any doubt about Russian toiler head being a weird twisted sociopath they should read his posts to remove any uncertainty
alfred neuman
25/8/2024
17:25
Looks like LAV is bossing it with his opinion of new mining code on lse.
" little difference" he suggests it will make.
He won't be saying that when there's no profits going forward.....
Fooca seems an educated guy.
Shame he doesn't post on here 🤔🤔😄😄

original fastjet
25/8/2024
11:52
Alfie got the kipper
Oh, the little kipper
Alfie got the bloater

Slapped across the face
Poor little wimp, oh, the little wimp
Oh, the little wimp
Smells like a bloater, the little wimp's face.

russian turnip farmer
25/8/2024
10:56
One from Alfred’s alchuves

its top up time. 26 Jun '23 - 16:33 - 12883 of 12885

If you think the volume was good today, just wait till confirmation of full funding comes in!

Moon landings come to mind.

_____
* Moon landings come to mind.*

Obviously comments made by an ignorant spotty faced virgin

alfred neuman
25/8/2024
08:38
They all know it's finished once Bernie makes the announcement.
dazaliam
24/8/2024
19:58
and we laughed even more at this this little Alfie
😂😂😂😂

Alfred *Nostradamus* Neuman Waankstain

11/3/2024
23:37ft alfred neuman: This is heading back to the 0.20s

I am very very rarely wrong

trolls and co
24/8/2024
18:08
Noted no discussion about it on lse just lav diverting attention ...
original fastjet
24/8/2024
18:07
Clueless Ben the gibbon created the alias 10p—here-we-come

What an absolute bellend

Oh how we laughed

alfred neuman
24/8/2024
17:08
The info posted by fooca on lse regarding the 2023 mining code is extremely interesting.
As Dazaliam suggests if Kod are moved onto it then the investment case for Kod shareholders goes out the window.
But never fear Bernie will be ok on his £8k a week fees and Steve will be fine with his other jobs....

original fastjet
24/8/2024
10:17
STAY SHORT
alfred neuman
24/8/2024
09:20
Alfred *Nostradamus* Neuman Waankstain

11/3/2024
23:37ft alfred neuman: This is heading back to the 0.20s

I am very very rarely wrong

trolls and co
23/8/2024
20:32
IMO 1p will NEVER be reached”

Alfred Neuman
11th July 2024


Alfred *Nostradamus* Neuman

alfred neuman
23/8/2024
19:52
An amicable board discussing is positive for everyone.
Thank you both and fooca on lse for all the info.
Enjoy the long weekend guys.
Fj.

original fastjet
23/8/2024
13:02
Exactly, Hainan can run Bougouni at a loss and still be Net positive downstream, why TO at these prices, let kodal shoulder the burden. Eventually kodal will surrender and give it away.
dazaliam
23/8/2024
12:41
I can see your line of thinking there.
dz30700
23/8/2024
12:36
Hainan will turn a profit on covnersion of the spod to hydroxide, kodal wont.
dazaliam
23/8/2024
12:33
Hi fjI appreciate the time on that message. In regards to lse. I dont know exactly why they were taken down but I was not the reason. Theres alot of banta that goes on between the 3 of us or there was sometime ago. Anyhow daza if your still reading pal. I don't fall out entirely with your maths but if it was not cost effective hainan would not be pursuing it still. If that makes sense. Cheers both must dash now.
dz30700
23/8/2024
12:30
I see fooca has posted the permit info on lse. All companies have to submit their paperwork to be updated to the 23 code = game over.
dazaliam
23/8/2024
12:21
Daz423,
I think it is obvious that Dazaliam and yourself have a lot of knowledge regarding mining stocks and it would benefit everyone to read the info.
It's a shame you both cannot debate.Although I would suggest that the claim by yourself of being in the top 3 worldwide should be withdrawn .Also I feel that you should back up your post with the viability info of new spod prices and possibility of moving onto the new code.
Granted no one should claim to have future definite figures.But you were asked.
I will admit I felt it underhand the way you reported those on lse who did not fit your view and this had left a bad taste.Everyone can rejoin lse under a different moniker and I bet a few have who have left already have rejoined.
I have never reported a post and believe everyone's view is welcome.Afterall a one sided debate is not a debate.
As for Kod getting taken over well that's always a possibility but there's a long way to go yet and no one knows where the second ship is yet!
Best wishes,
Fj.

original fastjet
23/8/2024
11:48
Yeah sorry fj me too I just warming up the idea of discussing with you both again with abit of banta on the side. Anyhow I don't feel comfortable too now.Cheers
dz30700
23/8/2024
11:29
I see no calculations for the viability of the mine anywhere from daz423.
What was all that fluff and bluster about??
Looking at the posts it looks to me that 423 could not get off the board fast enough lol.
Shame I was looking forward to a healthy debate 😄😄

original fastjet
Chat Pages: Latest  1043  1042  1041  1040  1039  1038  1037  1036  1035  1034  1033  1032  Older