We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kodal Minerals Plc | LSE:KOD | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BH3X7Y70 | ORD 0.03125P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.005 | -1.43% | 0.345 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.345 | 0.35 | 38,418,173 | 08:22:14 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Misc Nonmtl Minrls, Ex Fuels | 0 | 27.19M | 0.0013 | 2.62 | 70.84M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
26/8/2024 12:17 | Not on this chat board you moron 😂 | trolls and co | |
26/8/2024 07:23 | elco, first lithium have exploration permits which when they applied to renew got shoved onto new code. All mining operations have been asked to submit their paperwork to the govt for upgrade. No chance kodal will be the only company exempt. | dazaliam | |
26/8/2024 04:54 | mercman, not all ore is amenable to dms processing. Just because the MRE increased to 30Mt doesnt necessarily increase LOM. Most ore requires the use of flotation to liberate the spod. kodal cant afford flotation capex for stage 2 until after 4 yrs making bucket loads on stage 1 (DOH). The original idea of going dms only was to benefit from high sc prices, well that failed didnt it? | dazaliam | |
25/8/2024 19:19 | If anyone is any doubt about Russian toiler head being a weird twisted sociopath they should read his posts to remove any uncertainty | alfred neuman | |
25/8/2024 17:25 | Looks like LAV is bossing it with his opinion of new mining code on lse. " little difference" he suggests it will make. He won't be saying that when there's no profits going forward..... Fooca seems an educated guy. Shame he doesn't post on here 🤔🤔 | original fastjet | |
25/8/2024 11:52 | Alfie got the kipper Oh, the little kipper Alfie got the bloater Slapped across the face Poor little wimp, oh, the little wimp Oh, the little wimp Smells like a bloater, the little wimp's face. | russian turnip farmer | |
25/8/2024 10:56 | One from Alfred’s alchuves its top up time. 26 Jun '23 - 16:33 - 12883 of 12885 If you think the volume was good today, just wait till confirmation of full funding comes in! Moon landings come to mind. _____ * Moon landings come to mind.* Obviously comments made by an ignorant spotty faced virgin | alfred neuman | |
25/8/2024 08:38 | They all know it's finished once Bernie makes the announcement. | dazaliam | |
24/8/2024 19:58 | and we laughed even more at this this little Alfie 😂😂 Alfred *Nostradamus* Neuman Waankstain 11/3/2024 23:37ft alfred neuman: This is heading back to the 0.20s I am very very rarely wrong | trolls and co | |
24/8/2024 18:08 | Noted no discussion about it on lse just lav diverting attention ... | original fastjet | |
24/8/2024 18:07 | Clueless Ben the gibbon created the alias 10p—here-we-co What an absolute bellend Oh how we laughed | alfred neuman | |
24/8/2024 17:08 | The info posted by fooca on lse regarding the 2023 mining code is extremely interesting. As Dazaliam suggests if Kod are moved onto it then the investment case for Kod shareholders goes out the window. But never fear Bernie will be ok on his £8k a week fees and Steve will be fine with his other jobs.... | original fastjet | |
24/8/2024 10:17 | STAY SHORT | alfred neuman | |
24/8/2024 09:20 | Alfred *Nostradamus* Neuman Waankstain 11/3/2024 23:37ft alfred neuman: This is heading back to the 0.20s I am very very rarely wrong | trolls and co | |
23/8/2024 20:32 | IMO 1p will NEVER be reached” Alfred Neuman 11th July 2024 Alfred *Nostradamus* Neuman | alfred neuman | |
23/8/2024 19:52 | An amicable board discussing is positive for everyone. Thank you both and fooca on lse for all the info. Enjoy the long weekend guys. Fj. | original fastjet | |
23/8/2024 13:02 | Exactly, Hainan can run Bougouni at a loss and still be Net positive downstream, why TO at these prices, let kodal shoulder the burden. Eventually kodal will surrender and give it away. | dazaliam | |
23/8/2024 12:41 | I can see your line of thinking there. | dz30700 | |
23/8/2024 12:36 | Hainan will turn a profit on covnersion of the spod to hydroxide, kodal wont. | dazaliam | |
23/8/2024 12:33 | Hi fjI appreciate the time on that message. In regards to lse. I dont know exactly why they were taken down but I was not the reason. Theres alot of banta that goes on between the 3 of us or there was sometime ago. Anyhow daza if your still reading pal. I don't fall out entirely with your maths but if it was not cost effective hainan would not be pursuing it still. If that makes sense. Cheers both must dash now. | dz30700 | |
23/8/2024 12:30 | I see fooca has posted the permit info on lse. All companies have to submit their paperwork to be updated to the 23 code = game over. | dazaliam | |
23/8/2024 12:21 | Daz423, I think it is obvious that Dazaliam and yourself have a lot of knowledge regarding mining stocks and it would benefit everyone to read the info. It's a shame you both cannot debate.Although I would suggest that the claim by yourself of being in the top 3 worldwide should be withdrawn .Also I feel that you should back up your post with the viability info of new spod prices and possibility of moving onto the new code. Granted no one should claim to have future definite figures.But you were asked. I will admit I felt it underhand the way you reported those on lse who did not fit your view and this had left a bad taste.Everyone can rejoin lse under a different moniker and I bet a few have who have left already have rejoined. I have never reported a post and believe everyone's view is welcome.Afterall a one sided debate is not a debate. As for Kod getting taken over well that's always a possibility but there's a long way to go yet and no one knows where the second ship is yet! Best wishes, Fj. | original fastjet | |
23/8/2024 11:48 | Yeah sorry fj me too I just warming up the idea of discussing with you both again with abit of banta on the side. Anyhow I don't feel comfortable too now.Cheers | dz30700 | |
23/8/2024 11:29 | I see no calculations for the viability of the mine anywhere from daz423. What was all that fluff and bluster about?? Looking at the posts it looks to me that 423 could not get off the board fast enough lol. Shame I was looking forward to a healthy debate 😄😄 | original fastjet |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions