Juridica Share Discussion Threads

[tiswas] 19/6/2015 08:47

I wont be holding my breath waiting for Fields to buy shares at this level.

[jonwig] 18/6/2015 19:00

The single hit takes NAV from about 120p to 102p so maybe not much further to fall tomorrow, on fundamentals. Sentiment might hit it more, though.

EDIT: the RNS says 15.6p, so NAV is around 104p. Q3 update fairly soon.

Agreed, they should have waited until tomorrow morning to announce, but they can argue that they were obliged to release the information as soon as they received it, as it was in the US time zone.

The positives in the RNS might make a difference if the share price falls too far!

NB. Marked trades don't suggest any large holdings were sold in the last ten minutes - the fall earlier in the month is a bit more suspicious!!

[firtashia] 18/6/2015 18:30

Agree about the timing of the RNS. I believe this tells you something about the management. Out of this company as of tomorrow.

[my retirement fund] 18/6/2015 18:21

Not very nice to release that 10 mins before close so a few privieledged can exit before close.

This sort of thing needs to be released at 8AM and ideally earlier in the week.


tsk tsk tsk.

[eeza] 18/6/2015 18:19

Does it predict the share price will go UP ????

[djderry] 18/6/2015 18:10

Predictive text again,remind me not to use 'smartphone'!!

[eeza] 18/6/2015 18:02

Coshir ???

Kosher ?

[djderry] 18/6/2015 18:00

Predictive text! please read 'coshir ' for cosmic!

[djderry] 18/6/2015 17:58

What upsets me most here is not the RNS itself,but its timing,not very cosmic.As regards the RNS,you win some,you lose one,I'm a long term holder.Now,Richard,get back to managing the Co!

[neilyb675] 08/6/2015 17:52

"mildly annoyed".......nice wordsmithing.

[guernseymoney] 08/6/2015 17:28

Not sure if I agree, the investment case remains the same does it not?

It's such a unique investment theme/play that "regular" news flow that one might expect from other sectors is not the same here.

That said, I'm mildly annoyed that the share price is falling, but I've bought JIL at anything between 90p and 140p so it does has some volatility.

Am a long term holder.

[pillion] 08/6/2015 17:15

No news for us is bad news

[guernseymoney] 08/6/2015 16:35

Possibly, but IC are still bullish on JIL and they mentioned that in the same article you refer to.

Share price always seems to go like this until they announce what I hope is another fat dividend.

[speedsgh] 08/6/2015 16:23

Possibly some hopping over to BUR following today's postive write up on Burford Capital by Simon Thompson (Investors Chronicle)?

[neilyb675] 08/6/2015 16:11

all about whatever case is won and the associated dividend that it provides

[my retirement fund] 08/6/2015 16:06

This is selling of, anyone have any views of value and future here?

[woozle1] 20/5/2015 09:27

Something tells me that to wait until there's a discount to NAV. 12-24 months is a long for investors are, if things drag on as expected, then there may be an opportunity pick this up with a great margin for safety. Current NAV is £1.06 versus share price £1.16. Summer lull and lack of news could provide a good opportunity to make some unrisky money.
DYOR
W

[asmodeus] 15/5/2015 17:20

Many thanks Mad Foetus. Message read and understood.

[mad foetus] 14/5/2015 21:52

Asmodeus, I've sent you a private message.

[asmodeus] 14/5/2015 19:08

But is it not justifiable to question how much attention the man can give to the Business when preoccupied with this Court case?

[guernseymoney] 14/5/2015 11:27

Jonwig - that made me smile.

For the record, I regard the owners of the Telegraph as "rogues, parasites and shysters"

hXXps://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-sark-from-the-barclay-brothers

[jonwig] 14/5/2015 11:21

It boasts that it has clawed back more than $3 billion for its clients over the years.

A slight hint of disapproval there from the Telegraph writer, maybe?

Much of the press, and especially in-house journals for lawyers, regards litigation funders as rogues, parasites and shysters.

They haven't satisfactorily answered the "level playing field" argument: in a world where a small firm can't afford to sue a multinational for patent infringement it's probably the only response, other than capitulation. I hope JIL's new emphasis on this business will be successful!

Incidentally, she's a pretty attractive lass, I think. I keep getting e-mails from Russian model girls who want to date me. Maybe I should give it a go?

[asmodeus] 14/5/2015 11:07

From above - "Five times married businessman Mr Fields, 59, became the second husband of 42-year-old Ekaterina Parfenova, a Russian-born model, actress and philanthropist, in 2002. She is a former Miss World University..............

....She also wants maintenance payments from his £1.3m annual income, which comes from his company funding litigation in America.

Mr Fields is chairman and chief executive of Juridica Asset Management Ltd, which is described on its company website as “one of the most successful litigation funding firms in the world”. It boasts that it has clawed back more than $3 billion for its clients over the years. "

[valhamos] 13/5/2015 14:28

speedsgh

"JIL news is a precious commodity"

Maybe because the CEO of the manager, Juridica Asset Management, is too busy in a court and for a case that is not going to benefit JIL :o)

[eeza] 13/5/2015 13:56

TEK a better bet.