We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jubilee Metals | JLP | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.025 | -0.74% | 3.35 | 08:29:23 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.45 | 3.35 | 3.45 | 3.375 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| MINING |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 10/7/2025 09:29 by deme1 when the JLP share price was 3.35p. Oh dear been avoiding JLP and making money elsewhere, and when I look in JLP appears to be in trouble.2p buy order set, don't care if it gets filled as this is now a very risky play imo Gla |
Posted at 07/7/2025 16:07 by paultruth when the JLP share price was 3.375p. Sold jlp several years back at 16p bought more bitcoin and topped up on Gold. Which has proven to be great trades.Sitting here for a few years waiting to get back in to JLP in my opinion it's starting to get to a nice long term IE 12 months to 2 year but ..fingers on the button |
Posted at 01/7/2025 17:48 by undertaker when the JLP share price was 3.45p. charts updated in header.A clear divergence between JLP and JLPBI/Copper. Get those numbers out Leon!!! |
Posted at 18/6/2025 21:27 by kennyp52 The Bull .. I wrote to the CFO .. the reply I got was he’d had some minor dental work done and“ I have just got out of minor surgery at my dentist’s so I am not firing on all cylinders at present. It is considered sensible that I rest a little before I answer your email.” I wait with bated breath .. my question was .. I am a shareholder via Hargreaves Lansdown account and just wanted to clarify some publicly known information please to help me understand the price for the sale of the chrome and PGM businesses : Segmental reporting of assets in the accounts is circa $217m with NAV due to liabilities of $106m = $111m - per accounts 30/6/24 - taken from : We are being offered $90m for the assets - I presume the buyer will not be taking on liabilities - so will this result in a write down of circa $127m less whatever Tjate is valued at - I think exploration costs capitalised are around $41m but it remains a none mined asset. I would ask also what “exposure&rdqu Thirdly - if the buyer is offered “credit terms” over 3 years then would this not be what this side of the business produces in free cashflow anyway - what is the projected profit please at the guided chrome & PGM production and at the guided / reported AISC for the next year / 3 years ? If JLP only sell for what this business is generating anyway and then we also give the buyer the ability to spread payments then it makes no sense to me. I understand this is a sensitive time for the company and you may not be in a position to fully reply but this information is critical to shareholders in making a decision to support the sale . My concern is we are selling a proven and steady profit making arm of the business to become a single commodity producer of copper when PGM’s are showing signs of recovery and the copper price is at best flat and to date JLP have had nothing but problems with the copper projects ; spent significant capital and to date not given their shareholders a decent return on investment - so we need to see projected profitability of the copper also - as this is all we will have if the deal goes through . |
Posted at 18/6/2025 18:18 by eagle1234 Is the JLP basket price chart above a manual update?Wish JLP could do something like Tharisa where they update their basket price weekly hxxps://www.tharisa. I'm aware I could calculate myself... are these %s correct to everyone's knowledge? Cheers |
Posted at 13/6/2025 13:30 by haywards26 It is good to finally see some numbers and detail, just a shame it is the oak bloke publishing them and JLP did not include a summary of numerical detail in their initial RNS announcement.For me the SA disposal is at best neutral. It is not as JLP or some others try to spin a fantastic deal. Not by a long way. |
Posted at 12/6/2025 13:24 by haywards26 Charles' article is indeed well-researched and detailed, but I’d temper it slightly by asking: Have we ever seen a critical or negative article on JLP from him? Constructive scrutiny is just as important as optimism when it comes to assessing a company’s trajectory.There’s no question that Zambia and copper represent stronger growth markets — strategically, the pivot makes sense. However, I have lingering concerns around a few key aspects: Sale Valuation – Was the price achieved fair and reflective of the asset’s long-term potential? Sale Process – How competitive was it? Was this a distressed sale in all but name? Payment Terms - A three-year payment period seriously dulls the utility of the sale proceeds. If the goal is to invest and scale meaningfully in Zambia, as both the article and JLP assert, then staggered payments undermine that ambition. Growth requires capital — upfront and accessible — not trickled-in cash over multiple years. Above all, it’s hard to shake the view that this sale may not have been necessary had past strategic and operational performance been stronger. One could argue that we’re now consolidating or divesting from a position of relative weakness, not strength — a position that might have been avoided altogether. Still, we’ll see. Let’s look at the P&L in 12 months. That will tell us whether this move has truly set the stage for growth — or whether it’s just another reshuffle to cover historical underperformance. |
Posted at 11/6/2025 16:32 by haywards26 Isn't that just the point here and the story of being a JLP investor....blue sky, promises of riches, bad decisions etc"PGM prices starting to fly just as JLP are looking to sell!" I also expect it to be a done deal, I would have expected that key shareholders will have been approached and their views taken prior to releasing the disposal RNS... The lack of detail surrounding the disposal is poor, the payment profile is poor, the timing now seems to be very poor...Do all these not simplistically show that the deal is POOR? |
Posted at 11/6/2025 15:37 by kennyp52 PGM's still rising .. Shev you posted SA operations aren't sold yet but in my experience this is likely to be a done deal and PI's wont get much choice in the situation - just my opinion. I asked this before but Leon intimates we keep exposure to PGM's - anyone offer up a simple , straight forward reason as to how this will be the case and how much JLP will still be producing . PGM prices starting to fly just as JLP are looking to sell ! |
Posted at 06/6/2025 09:26 by tigerbythetail I agree that it is almost impossible to analyse this company properly - the company simply doesn't provide the necessary information. So this has always been a "hype" and "hope" share. (Compare JLP's reporting to SLP, which does everything so much better).I think we can also stop pretending that JLP is staffed by superb metallurgists who can magic money out of waste rock that everybody else can't. They've failed at that pretty comprehensively. Having thought about it, my only explanation for the sale of the productive South African assets is a stressed balance sheet and threatening creditors. It was simply a fire sale. IMO, JLP are now on the clock against bankruptcy - they need to start producing meaningful amounts of copper asap. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
