Itm Power Share Discussion Threads

[moontheloon] 29/11/2022 22:15

On top of the sa UK partnership for hydrogen renewables

[hurricane99] 29/11/2022 21:29

Sasol/Linde one of them

[gimmethefax] 29/11/2022 21:09

We are not dealing with typical bureaucrats.

Nor are there bumbling idiots in the House of Commons - a few 'useful idiots' about though, for sure.

This is crucial - and highly misunderstood.

But I am happy just living my life to the rhythm of the lullaby, they say.

Ok, take another 5 minutes shut eye - but then we MUST get to work.

Zzzz.

Good night, and good luck, all.

[grahamwales] 29/11/2022 19:24

Whilst we’re on nuclear the government reckon they will own 50% stake based on giving £700 million whilst the total cost in antipated to be circa £30 billion.

😂😂😂😂8514;😂

[grahamwales] 29/11/2022 19:22

Sonic

Think that just about sums up the red tape in the EU.

Unfortunately we have a government that are funded by oil and gas companies hence going for the nuclear option that will no doubt cost billions more than budgeted and not produce a single KW for at least 10 years.

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 18:24

Gimmie wont like that analysis, but I did pretty much the same at 680 on the other thread and 325 here

"Do not doubt THE IMPALER"

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 18:17

Some run started on hydn etfs now

Linde falling out of favour

[sonic25] 29/11/2022 18:15

"Pragmatism. Particularly with hydrogen. The American programme looks like this: when you produce a tonne of “green” hydrogen from renewable electricity, or “blue” hydrogen from natural gas, you receive a specific subsidy, with green being worth more than blue. In Europe, first you have to fill out a stack of applications. Then Brussels decides which projects are good and which aren’t, while taking regional proportional representation into account as well. We want to build an electrolyser in Lingen and have been waiting for the response to our application for one and a half years. We are not allowed to start earlier, as that would endanger the funding. If I knew that we would get a specific subsidy per kilogram, we would have started long ago." - Dr. Markus Krebber, CEO, RWE

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 18:06

Wtf was all that?

Only thing that tells me anything is you

Haha

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 18:02

You sound angry

If you sold at 325, you would say Vlad is great 😂

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 17:57

Shorters same

Only difference is, rolling it in lol

[gimmethefax] 29/11/2022 17:55

Just the way I roll, bro.

I wouldn't put my hard-earned petro-dollars on anything I wasn't sure of.




Ruh oh!

...watch that pride, Gimme, you know what comes next!

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 17:53

Yes Gimmie if

IF you want to give me assurances for 5 years down the road? THAT I can assure, is nuts

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 17:52

Norbus this is where u are mistaken

It’s not misery. It’s just an opinion

Look where positivity got you

The cynics here are all partying and like happy children 😂

[gimmethefax] 29/11/2022 17:51

Could, Lol.

If. Lol.

should we all sell on an, if?

I didn't buy on an, if. That much is recorded.

"Inevitable"

Can't take that one back easy.

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 17:50

If it doesn’t run out of cash snd gerbils to raise from. It’s no bank

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 17:49

That’s not a good idea

Maybe like Lloyds bank and Co;

It could simply end up trading 20-50p for a decade or two

[gimmethefax] 29/11/2022 17:48

Shorters indicate that their is potentially bad news coming - shorters do not care if tghis news is actually bad or not, as long as they can drive the price down.

There is only one price that you could concern me with - 0p.

Other then that, don't care.

[vlad the impaler] 29/11/2022 17:48

Gimmie

My timeframe on this market is long before itms invception

But if you want to live in the past ok, il just explain it’s rise as you explained it’s fall

“furthermore, I disagree, the markets are erratic and manipulated.”