Inland Homes Share Discussion Threads

[fanshaw] 03/7/2018 11:14

IgbertSponk

I think the last thing shareholders want in a company is confusion.

Remember the old saying, If it Looks Too Good Too Be True It Probably Is.

[briangeeee] 03/7/2018 10:05

I suppose the key is the valuation of KCR, and the relative valuation used for any share-based transactions compared to previous KCR capital transactions in which equity was issued for hard cash.

[muffster] 03/7/2018 10:02

As always two sides to this. It looks contrived and based on that sold out.

[igbertsponk] 03/7/2018 09:56

I wouldn't worry about these deals - they're tiddly and just take attention off the much bigger things INL are doing - the Beaconsfield and Cheshunt sites.
Actually.... glad they're are sowing confusion. Keeps the share price down for those of us accumulating.

[leading] 03/7/2018 09:51

Looks like those new non-execs will be earning their fees looking after the interests of the shareholders.

Market rightly cautious in assessing these transactions.

According to the latest Annual Reports:

S Wicks owns 6.8% of Inland which has net assets of £130.5m

Energiser Investments owns 24.71% of KCR which has net assets of just £4.5m

S Wicks owns 28.4% of Energiser which has net assets of a paltry £1.3m

Now we have an opaque transaction which may be settled in cash or equity in a tiddler depending. There are clearly dangers of a conflict of interest here. Also, Wicks' interest in KCR should have been disclosed in the original announcement of a tie up with them. It shouldn't have been necessary for bulletin board sleuths earlier in the thread to dig this up.

Hmmm

[fanshaw] 02/7/2018 21:05

grahamburn

When these inter company transactions start getting incestous you never know
who owns whom.

[grahamburn] 02/7/2018 18:33

Not sure how you can make that statement.

The fall today is more than likely related to the general market malaise rather than an opinion one way or the other about the first deals within the new collaboration agreement.

[fanshaw] 02/7/2018 16:37

Market & shareholders not enamoured with new setup.

[spud] 27/6/2018 08:48

Brian (For those about to rock) Johnson? Let's hope there's no Dirty deeds done dirt cheap.....spud

[igbertsponk] 27/6/2018 08:29

Indeed - vital to beef up the board to seem less of a one-man band.

[daicaprice] 27/6/2018 08:15

Agreed.

DC

[p1966] 27/6/2018 08:01

Two excellent board appointments, which should support Inland's strategy and future growth plans.GLA.

[shaker44] 25/6/2018 08:06

so presumably Inland is seeking a buy for the Premier deal to turn forward rents into cash. pension fund maybe

[shaker44] 25/6/2018 08:06

so presumably Inland is seeking a buy for the Premier deal to turn forward rents into cash. pension fund maybe

[oi_oi_savaloy] 13/6/2018 19:53

Ah; sorry Cerrito - didn't mean to offend - hadn't looked at the share register. deepest apologies - I'll butt out in future!

[tradingcoder] 13/6/2018 18:28

The last we heard from Mr Dixon, he held 17,000,000 shares, a million would be about right

[oi_oi_savaloy] 13/6/2018 18:20

He's bought 16,000,000 shares Cerrito? How do you read the below as 'sold'?

'Inland Homes plc (AIM: INL), the leading brownfield regeneration specialist and housebuilder with a focus on the South and South East of England, announces that it received notification on 12 June 2018 that Mark Hollingsworth Dixon now holds 16,000,000 ordinary shares in the Company, representing 7.9 per cent. of the Company's issued share capital.

[cerrito] 12/6/2018 17:35

Good to see the market can take Mr Dixon selling 1m shares in its stride

[cheshire man] 12/6/2018 15:53

Nice two year chart here reaching for that 90p level again.....just a matter of time IMV ,,,,,DYOR

[djderry] 12/6/2018 15:42

I'm surprised no company has tried to buy them, they are seriously undervalued.

[cockerhoop] 12/6/2018 13:13

The ST 12 o'clock spike :-)

[yump] 12/6/2018 12:32

Right, now this time everybody jump up and down - I mean everybody...