Indivior Share Discussion Threads

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 23:15

A guy who's pumping Toople doesn't deserve to be here!

[letmepass] 10/4/2019 23:10

20p buy in tomorrow.. Shorts will be all over this as buying slows

[maddog68] 10/4/2019 22:57

Jamdan good luck tomorrow, i think it will dive imo but hope I'm wrong.

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 22:48

Anyway....RB tried to pass it to us today,some didn't realised first,...but it getting clear that RB had the company on that time!

[jamdan1] 10/4/2019 22:39

Maddog..I got on at similar price. Us dropped ten percent less than us so we should go to at least on a similar price in the morning. Personally i think this will go higher.

[maddog68] 10/4/2019 22:36

Costax i was in two minds,i could of got in at 30p then it went upto 38 i eventually took the plunge at 34.6 and it dropped like a stone again....Not happy paying that now.

[elliotset] 10/4/2019 22:32

This is going to sub 20p obviously over next few days

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 22:17

https://www.ft.com/content/3f667e24-5b85-11e9-939a-341f5ada9d40

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 22:15

But why has the City taken fright?Well, until it was listed as a separate company back in 2014, Indivior, or the assets that became Indivior, were owned by Reckitt.And, according to Wednesday's bombshell release, the US allegations are "based on actions that occurred almost exclusively prior to Indivior becoming an independent company in its demerger from Reckitt Benckiser".It's worth noting the household products giant previously set aside £305mln (US$400mln) to cover potential Suboxone liabilities."We've got no idea how this will play out," said candid Canadian outfit RBC Capital, reiterating its 'underperform' rating on Reckitt shares."Indivior 'believes the allegations are unsupported by the facts and the law' and states that it could take 12 months or more for the case to be heard."

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 22:15

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/218327/reckitt-benckiser-investors-tread-carefully-after-indivior-bombshell-218327.html

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 22:12

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-10/reckitt-benckiser-didn-t-ditch-indivior-fast-enough-for-the-doj

[cantrememberthis2] 10/4/2019 22:03

Yep... Board need to engage with RB imo ref damages

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 22:02

Some just realise that

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 22:01

Told you: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-10/reckitt-benckiser-didn-t-ditch-indivior-fast-enough-for-the-doj

[maddog68] 10/4/2019 22:01

Costax i was in two minds,i could of got in at 30p then it went upto 38 i eventually took the plunge at 34.6 and it dropped like a stone again....Not happy paying that now.

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 21:58

Yes....once I saw that court case docs

[maddog68] 10/4/2019 21:56

Cox 27 ?? I take it you only bought today ?

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 21:54

It supposed to trade around 90 p just with the money in the accounts!

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 21:54

Don't really matters....I just look at their accounts!!!

[maddog68] 10/4/2019 21:53

Cox what you averaged at ?

[costax1654x] 10/4/2019 21:50

They assuming the blaim!