We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now


It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

HUM Hummingbird Resources Plc

-0.18 (-2.12%)
20 Feb 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Hummingbird Resources Plc LSE:HUM London Ordinary Share GB00B60BWY28 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.18 -2.12% 8.32 8.20 8.80 8.50 8.35 8.50 218,213 16:35:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Gold Ores 150.52M -34.28M -0.0569 -1.49 51.16M
Hummingbird Resources Plc is listed in the Gold Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker HUM. The last closing price for Hummingbird Resources was 8.50p. Over the last year, Hummingbird Resources shares have traded in a share price range of 6.80p to 20.25p.

Hummingbird Resources currently has 601,918,700 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Hummingbird Resources is £51.16 million. Hummingbird Resources has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.49.

Hummingbird Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 7401 to 7424 of 25975 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  307  306  305  304  303  302  301  300  299  298  297  296  Older
Not sure I would agree and if I could not find the info I wanted, as you say it is hard to ascertain from filings and returns, then I think I would walk away. I don't have enough to take too high an undue risk, a bit of risk yes but I have to be comfortable with it.
moneyfornothing1 To the best of my ability, (and others on here have also said the same) I absolutely did thoroughly research the company. But (as I'm sure you'll agree,) a company mouthpiece "in the know" who is as persistent as Fsj has been over the last three years, is very hard to ignore?
That seems to me to be part and parcel of investing in AIM companies, higher risk and reward and why I will only ever invest a small part of my portfolio here. If you can't research the company properly you are taking a stab in the dark in my opinion.
moneyfornothing1 More investors than me have hinted on here that their judgement was swayed by Fsj. After all, he did win the competition to visit the mine and he put a glowing, lengthy report on here about his visit. His companion on the trip was another investor, who commented some time ago on here that he was "sick as FK" or words to that effect, of the progress made since the visit. I got my fingers burned with a fledgling oil co. in the US several years ago that bore remarkable similarities to this in as much that the financials were always "patchy", inconclusive and they were overseen by a board member with doubtful contacts. Remember, not all information is available on the Internet and parts are often removed.
borderterrier I still have more research to carry out before I get to the point here of forming my own opinions, will check out the Betts family too but would be surprised if they could influence investment companies but like I say more research to do yet.

You seem to role out that quote about the lair on top quite often LOL. You certainly don't seem to be a fan of fsjamescampbell, did you get taken in by what you say was misleading information and was some of that from him?

moneyfornothing1 If only it was that simple. Under "normal" circumstances, a Ceo with a track record with a co. like this would have been removed, don't you agree? And if you don't agree, why not? Perhaps the Betts family, with their long involvement in this industry have clout in other areas? Please read the glowing testimonials back in the early days when this was just a hole in the ground. Where did all that "information for investors" come from? Information that has since proved to be completely misleading. Misleading for virtually everyone who invested here early with the possible exception of Fsj the co. mouth piece and mine visitor that by his own admission has now accumulated more shares because he "luckily" knew when to sell.

And don't forget that since mine completion, this share price has steadily deteriorated. Why?? It wasn't because of the security breach. It wasn't because of bad weather. It wasn't because the supply bridge washed out. It wasn't because of the involvement in BH. The share price was deteriorating long BEFORE all that happened. Why? Any ideas? Look at what is happening with Cora right now and always remember the quote from the 1880 gold rush in the US:- "a goldmine is a hole in the ground with a liar at the top". And at the end of the day, the 10 year chart says it all.

Little rise so far today......nice to see
What makes you think it is a strong possibility?

I would assume that if it was to happen it would have been when all the bad decisions you say were taken came to bear, which surely means the middle of 2018 don't you think?

moneyfornothing1 I agree and I did say exactly this in another post on here a couple of weeks ago. I think (depending on the next update) the Ceos removal is a strong possibility and I would welcome that decision.
borderterrier PI's have little leverage but II's certainly do. Would you not think that if the II's wanted the CEO removed they would not be able to do it?

If you think they have the power and they have not removed the CEO it might possibly mean that maybe they are not as unhappy as you certainly are with him. We will never know what they think until any action is taken but just a thought.

Redtrend Good post above. I would suggest that some of UKG's negative sentiment would be factoring in frustration for "all the problems experienced". IMO with an experienced team some of those problems should have and could have been avoided. Paying high salaries to a Ceo who obviously doesn't know what he is doing and who is even more obviously hiring the wrong team here smacks of gross inexperience/arrogance and disregard to the shareholders. Its a very poor show and it will continue until the man at the helm is removed. We, the long time shareholders have been patiently waiting for the faint glimmer of hope that (despite Fsj's continual ramping and support ) never comes. Changes need to be implemented for that to happen. Disaster Dan Betts has had long enough.
Whilst I agree with some of UKG's negative sentiment there are key items that are not correct:

1) If you try and normalise HUM Market Cap to include for its gross debt, you also have to include its cash position and has to be Net Debt basis ($43m Net Debt).

2) G&A costs outside of Yanfofila AISC of $100 per Oz is just a made up number. AISC includes all G&A costs. The exclusions are Non-sustaining Capex & Exploration, Dugbe and any other costs not linked to Yanfofila. Once the Ball Mill costs of $13m and recent non-sustaining Exploration Costs of $8.6m are worked through the books (a lot of it is fresh and still hitting the books), the reported Yan AISC will be closer to actual cashflow estimates.

3) The Mine Life as per the Plan was 7yrs even without Gonka and other extensions. So as a minimum you would have 6yrs left, not 5. Quite a sizeable difference when people calculate P/E and what multiple to use.

4) When calculating Tax, you must include for substantial depreciation/ amortisation of capitalised costs which will significantly reduce profit in the books and therefore the tax.

So whilst I would agree the share price is currently "fair value" for all the problems experienced, it's not "toppy" by any means. Although let's see what next raft of news brings: Annual Accounts should be soon, as should LoM update. But of course the key update will be Q2 2019 results.

Fsj. Perhaps I'm somewhere else? Can't wait to see where the share price goes today. As usual, I'm sure your friend Disaster Dan has everything under control. Yanfofailure!!!
07:01 love me you peanut butter smeared weirdo.............Anyway why you posting, isn't it the middle of the night in the US....?
Fsj. Perhaps its because regardless of how bad this company performs you still support Disaster Dan and Yanfofailure. I wonder why?
ii will be increasing fees again from June 10th.

Its long overdue I transferred out from this broker.

If anybody can recommend a cheaper broker let me know.

I am considering going to iweb-sharedealing(Halifax) for a fixed £5 a trade or X-O(Jarvis) for £5.95, neither have monthly, yearly, or inactivity fees like ii

napolean 14th. I agree, the Ceo here needs to go immediately and I am really surprised he has not been removed before now. Unfortunately, regardless of the glaringly obvious, complete idiots like Fsj and New_Buyer are still hanging around to convince us all he is doing a great job. And they both think that I'm an idiot for suggesting that he needs to be removed........ but the current share price confirms it. It's strange World we live in these days when people abandon objectivity in favor of sentiment. It is DB's baby after all and investors are suffering here as a result of his selfish ends.

Some nice words in the morning note from the highly respected mining analyst John Meyer at share price Angel ref: LSE:KAV / /Tw*tt*r = #KAV

Kavango Resources (KAV LN) 3.6p, Mkt Cap £5.7m – Laws of probability to be rewritten after Kavango strikes mineralisation in first and second drill holes under Karoo sand in Botswana

Kavango, which is exploring for a large-scale bushveld igneous-type mineralisation reports results from a second drill hole in Botswana.

The team which are highly experienced in the geology of the region have used geophysical data and remote sensing to establish drilling locations.

Remarkably, the first drill hole hit mineralisation under the sandy Karoo sediments
Even more remarkably the second drill hole is reported to have also hit mineralisation including copper in chalcopyrite with a 1.5% XRF gun reading. X-Ray Frequency gun readings are not considered to be reliable due to their potential for miss-reporting but we do place some value on the readings when in the honorable hands of Messrs. Foster and Moles.

The first drill hole hit a 200m zone of intensely altered rock with indicative cobalt values of up to 0.9%, averaging 0.2% cobalt and >70m of elevated copper, zinc, lead and nickel values.

Conclusion: Kavango is worth watching and we await results from drill core assays. While we never doubted the skill of the geological team we are surprised and impressed to see two sets of mineralised results in so short a time frame. Well done team!

cpap man
I have "quite a few" HUM & a 55% loss in 2 years.
The weather has caused problems, but as avsome1968 points out, there's plenty of company failures in the minerals sector as a whole. I sold 80% of SDX @ c. 40p - phew!. Their CEO Welch got booted out, like VOG's, & it's what the two deserved.
I would not be dismayed if the same happened here!

I think reason says to wait for Q3 results & review in the light of that.
I won't pretend I have any enthusiasm left, just trying to evaluate the risk/reward in HUM, & on evidence so far that's a hit & miss situation

napoleon 14th
rileyma. Thank you. We'll need it with this management and Ceo. I guess they are gathering experience along the way? But then why would they pay themselves such ridiculous salaries? Wouldn't it be better to employ experienced guys instead? I mean genuinely experienced, not this shower.
Watching on the side lines with interest
Sept last yr all still ok,heavy rains indicated
Lower prod issues
Issues indicated oct 25th,wheels fell off following day 26th with q3 report

Theres no rush to invest here certainly
Before q3 report this year,at which point all should
Become a lot clearer

Good luck to existing holders

replicas1967 I guess you mean in 2025 when they have addressed all the other problems? Don't forget they can't even get the ore out of the ground and meet targets in Yanfofailure.
Maybe if they process Cora ore in future? Who knows ?
Plasbryn After such a stellar performance to date from this "experienced" team perhaps they should order another one?
Chat Pages: Latest  307  306  305  304  303  302  301  300  299  298  297  296  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 |