We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hochschild Mining Plc | LSE:HOC | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B1FW5029 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-4.20 | -2.25% | 182.60 | 182.60 | 183.20 | 187.40 | 181.60 | 187.40 | 198,340 | 11:37:32 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Silver Ores | 693.72M | -55.01M | -0.1069 | -17.12 | 941.46M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/2/2018 12:14 | DT .. not gonna push you as you are obviously in the converted group but your reasons are enough alone to stay away ... no fundamentals at all just fluffy hot air. Good luck | onedayrodders | |
05/2/2018 12:04 | Hope you're right juju Stacked against us short term tho. | dt1010 | |
05/2/2018 11:54 | I HAVEN'T GIVEN UP ON THE 220 AREA HERE YET. Just a blip at the mo. | juju44 | |
05/2/2018 11:53 | Hedge funds and speculation Also a lot of the 'regulation' concerns are over blown Other reasons too. Short covering. FOMO. Watch it happen | dt1010 | |
05/2/2018 11:39 | why exactly would Bitcoin go from 5000 to 30k in 2018 | onedayrodders | |
05/2/2018 11:36 | 200p target now $5000 is next support after $8000 breaks...which it has... I reckon $5000 is a buy zone recognised by a lot of buyers. Targets $25-30k in 2018 I personally think. | dt1010 | |
05/2/2018 11:29 | being tested here now. If this breaks down its run for the hills | juju44 | |
05/2/2018 10:33 | DT .. you seem to be covering all the bases "Bitcoin will crash again, sure. To $5k to sub $5k probably..." So that's anywhere from 0 to $5000 right ? and 2 weeks ago you said it's double bottomed around 10,500. WTF are the G20 gonna say about revaluing thin air ! | onedayrodders | |
05/2/2018 09:42 | 220 still looks nailed on . Some recovery in PMs today should help | juju44 | |
05/2/2018 01:10 | Snore he has been blush for ages and yet nothing has happened Go back and see a few of his videos over the last few months and see how well he has called it so far actually. I don't have time for most of the chartists but Christopher Aaron is pretty much on the mark so far. He said we will face some downward pressure over the next few weeks perhaps months and so far we are seeing this play out. The real evidence per his charting skills will come when we get a strong upwards movement after this period of consolidation. If that plays out too then he would have done very well. If he gets it wrong then he will lose what credibility he has gained to date. Must admit I am beginning to wish I was in copper and other base metals more than silver and gold with HOC, but I am wishing very much that CA's thoughts come to be realistic and we will be happy we hold. I just need the patience to keep waiting while other share prices I have been following climb higher without me. Sod's Law if I sell my HOC holding they will fly! | lauders | |
04/2/2018 20:30 | Bitcoin will crash again, sure. To $5k to sub $5k probably... But it will rise very aggressively. I expect everyone interested in buying in, is waiting for after the G20 meeting when crypto regulation is being discussed in detail. The alts will crash too. On the bounce these will be at levels that once bought will mint millionaires. You'll get no such volatility with HOC or any miner for that matter. But then, you wouldnt want it. HOC will take a good 2 years to double from present levels. Which is fine by me, absolutely fine. | dt1010 | |
04/2/2018 19:47 | "Wolf Of Wall Street Says Bitcoin Could Hit $50K Before Crashing" hilarious !! looks like the Wolf forgot to sell | onedayrodders | |
04/2/2018 19:40 | DOW on Friday has fallen the most in points since 1987 ... it's no risk to say stocks across the board will be weak tomorrow. I see Cryptos the new "store of value" heading down again | onedayrodders | |
04/2/2018 18:25 | Well I thought I'd be closed out yesterday but we ended the day where we started. Thats remarkable for a day with a 60 point fall on silver. This test was reassuring Of course I trust silver will not, fall further but return to at least $17 in a few sessions). HOC is a reassuringly good geared play on silver recovery and then some. GLA H | hectorp | |
04/2/2018 16:55 | DT, good luck with your sub £2 predictions. Silver/Gold prices have been lower than this before and HOC has held it's ground at around £2.19p. At least HOC is backed by real value in PM's, can't say the same for crypto currencies lol. | kryptonsnake | |
04/2/2018 16:08 | People follow too many “experts” This is a solid, well run company, or so we are told. There’s always excuses for HOC not performing. Now some are looking at 150P as a new support. Maybe HOC will perform better once the weather perks up. | richkid71 | |
04/2/2018 16:03 | I guess the proof of the pudding is in the eating. I'll assume you'll apologise for a false prophesy tomorrow dt, when your proven wrong | maximus57 | |
04/2/2018 15:38 | Snore he has been blush for ages and yet nothing has happened This will decline tomorrow 200p target for bears. A break down of that with volume and 150p is the next technical target. Where is the thesis for being bullish here on price? Other than hoping that silver increases in price? | dt1010 | |
04/2/2018 14:24 | Excellent piece from Christopher Aaron Very interesting chart showing bond rates rising historically and gold surging through same period, yet the narrative is gold doesn't do well during int rate rises. Bond market is setting up to implode in the same way again now so looking good for PM's | onedayrodders | |
04/2/2018 14:05 | Better than it will be tomorrow. | eeza | |
04/2/2018 13:51 | Afternoon juju ..how's your luck | onedayrodders | |
04/2/2018 13:48 | Might be better to just stay in bed on Monday | juju44 | |
04/2/2018 13:33 | The article was mainly concerning Cannington & Fresnillo. Don't know how (if) relevant. | eeza | |
04/2/2018 08:56 | Hi eeza, Thanks for the link. The argument is that certain silver producer co's are reporting artificially low 'cash costs' for their silver production, because they factor in the revenues of other metal byproduct sales. Usually copper, zinc, lead and gold.... But surely this won't work, because - if you reallocate revenue in this way - they'd also be reporting an awful lot of unproductive work mining stuff that doesn't generate income.....? And it shouldn't apply to HOC, in any event, because , with a roughly 50/50 revenue split silver/gold, HOC would be reporting an absurdly low cash cost for its silver... and no revenue for its gold..... I don't follow FRES, maybe the argument holds with them ? ATB | extrader |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions