Hibu Share Discussion Threads

[adh0] 27/7/2013 19:51

I would assume that ANY proposals made at the EGM would have 100% support of all shareholders since the alternative is the certainty they get nothing. So even if the EGM proposals lead to nothing it was going to be that anyway.

Good Luck all.

[diku] 27/7/2013 18:38

Minus the board salary....

[john168] 27/7/2013 17:14

breakup the company, sell all assets, pay all the creditors, the rest returns to the shareholders. That is the rule.

[freddie ferret] 27/7/2013 16:13

Shortly the current chairman will not have a job IMHO.

[john168] 27/7/2013 16:00

unless an administrator called in, shareholders are the owners of the company.

[diku] 27/7/2013 12:42

R Ball....If the board said the shares were worthless then why did they allow the shares to be traded?....and what about the money they are getting paid?...

[charker] 27/7/2013 11:56

Could someone clarify something for me.

In that article above it says the restructuring needs to be approved by 75% of the lenders, it makes no mention of shareholders. No surprise there then!

I assume therefore that the action group talking about getting 25% to block it is not related to this vote but something else? If so, what? An EGM maybe?

[notanewmember2] 27/7/2013 10:57

But it could have been a secret clandestine cult code to back up the truck.

[r ball] 27/7/2013 09:50

you lot are deranged. the board even told you a few months back that the shares were worthless. you only have yourselves to blame. if you cannot even do that then you shouldn't even be buying shares.

[rudder] 26/7/2013 22:28

The wicked ways of the Stock Market.

[hvs] 26/7/2013 18:03

The "Chairman"

Laughing all the way to the BANK with GOLDEN SACKS in tow.

[freddie ferret] 26/7/2013 17:44

New thread.

[freddie ferret] 26/7/2013 17:43

Look at the accounts and try to draw conclusions, dud set of accounts.

[sleveen] 26/7/2013 17:40

I did comment 18 months ago that the revenue from digital was not increasing at a rate that replaced the loss of revenue from print.

Nil desperandum.

[hvs] 26/7/2013 16:38

Anyone know who will pay Golden Sacks ?

And how much ???

Is the "Chairman" having a LAUGH ?

[freddie ferret] 26/7/2013 15:46

Actually I am quite chilled. Some years ago I had a holding in QXL that cost me £52k it fell to below £1k and I stopped watching it eventually sold out for £170k if I had waited right to the end I'd have got £180k for it.

[embers69] 26/7/2013 15:20

My heart bleeds for anyone that got locked in. But life continues and if you want a get out of jail card then CAZA will help. Check this ticket coad out!

[freddie ferret] 26/7/2013 15:05

Nevertheless the management must always act within and only within the law. If they do not or have not they leave themselves vulnerable. In civil law the onus of proof is not nearly so vigorous as in criminal law. This matter is best left to lawyers and judges.

[diku] 26/7/2013 14:30

Last w/end Media was spot on...

As I said before its the insiders(board) that owns the company in the PLC Casinos and not the wider shareholders as they are just a side kick....