We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hemogenyx Pharmaceuticals Plc | LSE:HEMO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYX3WZ24 | ORD GBP0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.013 | -0.85% | 1.525 | 1.50 | 1.55 | 1.518 | 1.516 | 1.52 | 2,045,464 | 16:35:20 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finance Services | 0 | -3.98M | -0.0035 | -4.34 | 17.36M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
03/2/2020 12:29 | Marie, which subsidiary deals with CDX/HEMO-CAR-T? | on target | |
03/2/2020 12:26 | are you Italian by any chance? | purple11 | |
03/2/2020 12:10 | Anyone wants to add here ? ==================== Thanks Peter, My main concern is money goes from HEMO into subs, and they place. Even if HEMO goes to trials, gets funding, that goes to the sub. So HEMO balance sheet will always look low, hence they can place. We’ve feeling They want to do that, that's the whole point of being a floated company, to get funding from investors. Another thing, why every time a new contract is made the revenues conveniently go into a new subsidiary of which only Dr. Sandler and his wife are directors. Why doing this stops cash going into the main HEMO account and hence makes it not look cash rich hence they can still place, which has just what happened! What financial costs the subsidiaries incur, and have they paid back any costs to HEMO ?. If not, why not please ? If they say the subs don't incur any costs, then what's the point of them collecting money you're never going to spend ?! I hope you understand my concern here that when you're a shareholder of a company, and you don't see the fruits of your labor coming back to the company you're invested in, and then you see said company say 'we need to dilute your shares because we need more money', it's a sour taste, correct ?! Also, there is a murmur about the timing of recently £5,00 share bought by Andrew. Why he bought only after the placement was done ? Isn’t that kind of insider information ?! I apologies for my ranting but I’m slowly losing patience with this share Best Regards | marie1980 | |
03/2/2020 11:57 | I feel a big bounce coming here any time soon.... (I just hope it isn't before Thursday when I get to release some more funds to add/average down here). | eggbird | |
03/2/2020 11:32 | another adfvn unemployed keyboard warrior. Christ it must be boring in bedsitland. | purple11 | |
03/2/2020 11:28 | Why would I want to see invoices? Unlike you I don't think the company, its directors, independent auditors and accountants are all a bunch of con-men. | on target | |
03/2/2020 11:26 | You don't get to see invoices in 'company accounts'. I can tell none of you own businesses. | davevt | |
03/2/2020 11:25 | What's the balance sheet got to do with whether they can place or not. All information including what the c. £750k staff costs get spent on is in the company accounts as you would expect, nothing is hidden. A lot of that is actually accounting for share options and not actual cash spent by the way. | on target | |
03/2/2020 11:23 | glad you saw the trade go through... | purple11 | |
03/2/2020 11:23 | 'It's his personal account'.. Yet also the one he let's out rampy leaky tweets about the company and doesn't post anything 'personal' on it at all. You can't have it both ways..and certainly no reason to BLOCK PEOPLE 😅 | davevt | |
03/2/2020 11:22 | "you couldn't buy al 1.6" LOL, some of us could :) | on target | |
03/2/2020 11:20 | why shouldn't sandler block ppl on twitter if they hassle him on it?its his personal account. all correspondence should be sent to HEMO through their email. | purple11 | |
03/2/2020 11:20 | Marie, why are you bothering messaging the company. Just look at the facts. Money goes from hemo into subs, and they place. Even if the company goes to trials, gets funding, that goes to the sub. So hemo balance sheet will always look low, hence they can place. They want to do that, that's the whole point of being a floated company, to get funding from investors. You can't plead poverty with millions in the bank. | davevt | |
03/2/2020 11:17 | Ok Purple, please put your thoughts here and I'll consolidate and reply him. | marie1980 | |
03/2/2020 11:16 | I did get in on that, you couldn't buy al 1.6, 1.81 was my entry. Anyway.. Please send him this. Ask him why every time a new contract is made the revenues conveniently go into a new subsidiary of which only him and his wife are directors. Why is his wife on it anyway 😂 Ask him why doing this stops cash going into the main hemo account and hence makes it not look cash rich hence they can still place,WHICH HAS JUST HAPPENED. Ask them what financial costs the subsidiaries incur, and have they paid back any costs to hemo. If not, why not. If they say the subs don't incur any costs, then what's the point of them collecting money you're never going to spend. Ask them why they block anyone that asks these questions via twitter.. Marie, for a fact, the company had a load of research and work done by hemo, gets a contract, revenues from that benefit on research go into a sub and not back to the hemo company. That is legally, legitimately 'diverting' funds. It's not illegal, anyone can do it, and those subs can pay whoever they like. But when you're a shareholder of a company, and you don't see the fruits of your labour coming back to the company you're invested in, and then you see said company say 'we need to dilute your shares because we need more money', it's a sour taste, correct | davevt | |
03/2/2020 11:12 | free phase 1 trials once the globalco sign the development agreement! take a look at AVCT to see how its done. | purple11 | |
03/2/2020 11:12 | Purple, I've made more money on this share than you have. I've been in and out on exactly the points I advised people to get in or out if they want. Safely, profitably, or they could listen to you and be underwater for a year? Anyway.. Please send him this. Ask him why every time a new contract is made the revenues conveniently go into a new subsidiary of which only him and his wife are directors. Why is his wife on it anyway 😂 Ask him why doing this stops cash going into the main hemo account and hence makes it not look cash rich hence they can still place,WHICH HAS JUST HAPPENED. Ask them what financial costs the subsidiaries incur, and have they paid back any costs to hemo. If not, why not. If they say the subs don't incur any costs, then what's the point of them collecting money you're never going to spend. Ask them why they block anyone that asks these questions via twitter.. Marie, for a fact, the company had a load of research and work done by hemo, gets a contract, revenues from that benefit on research go into a sub and not back to the hemo company. That is legally, legitimately 'diverting' funds. It's not illegal, anyone can do it, and those subs can pay whoever they like. But when you're a shareholder of a company, and you don't see the fruits of your labour coming back to the company you're invested in, and then you see said company say 'we need to dilute your shares because we need more money', it's a sour taste, correct | davevt | |
03/2/2020 11:10 | 5 employees, free use of globalcos facilities to develop their work... In fact I'd like you to tell me where 3/4 of a million is going each year? Please send him this. Ask him why every time a new contract is made the revenues conveniently go into a new subsidiary of which only him and his wife are directors. Why is his wife on it anyway 😂 Ask him why doing this stops cash going into the main hemo account and hence makes it not look cash rich hence they can still place,WHICH HAS JUST HAPPENED. Ask them what financial costs the subsidiaries incur, and have they paid back any costs to hemo. If not, why not. If they say the subs don't incur any costs, then what's the point of them collecting money you're never going to spend. Ask them why they block anyone that asks these questions via twitter.. Marie, for a fact, the company had a load of research and work done by hemo, gets a contract, revenues from that benefit on research go into a sub and not back to the hemo company. That is legally, legitimately 'diverting' funds. It's not illegal, anyone can do it, and those subs can pay whoever they like. But when you're a shareholder of a company, and you don't see the fruits of your labour coming back to the company you're invested in, and then you see said company say 'we need to dilute your shares because we need more money', it's a sour taste, correct | davevt | |
03/2/2020 11:09 | john hes never even brought a position before!! | purple11 | |
03/2/2020 11:08 | perhaps youd care to email them asking how they manage to keep their overheads so low? a 650k cash burn per year is pretty damn fantastic in this sector! | purple11 | |
03/2/2020 11:08 | God dave you are so BORING ... Find something else to do with your life or is this the only social interaction you have with people. | johntopdog | |
03/2/2020 11:07 | Please send him this. Ask him why every time a new contract is made the revenues conveniently go into a new subsidiary of which only him and his wife are directors. Why is his wife on it anyway 😂 Ask him why doing this stops cash going into the main hemo account and hence makes it not look cash rich hence they can still place,WHICH HAS JUST HAPPENED. Ask them what financial costs the subsidiaries incur, and have they paid back any costs to hemo. If not, why not. If they say the subs don't incur any costs, then what's the point of them collecting money you're never going to spend. Ask them why they block anyone that asks these questions via twitter.. Marie, for a fact, the company had a load of research and work done by hemo, gets a contract, revenues from that benefit on research go into a sub and not back to the hemo company. That is legally, legitimately 'diverting' funds. It's not illegal, anyone can do it, and those subs can pay whoever they like. But when you're a shareholder of a company, and you don't see the fruits of your labour coming back to the company you're invested in, and then you see said company say 'we need to dilute your shares because we need more money', it's a sour taste, correct | davevt | |
03/2/2020 11:06 | why do you eel the need to copy and repost your posts. we read it the first time.and the second time. enlighten us on your trading experience. whats the best trade you've done? | purple11 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions