We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd | LSE:GKP | London | Ordinary Share | BMG4209G2077 | COM SHS USD1.00 (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1.90 | -1.43% | 130.70 | 131.00 | 131.80 | 134.40 | 130.30 | 132.50 | 1,212,960 | 16:35:27 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs | 123.51M | -11.5M | -0.0517 | -33.85 | 389.28M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
27/1/2017 11:22 | Jester How do you know that the above statement is correct ??? | oilman63 | |
27/1/2017 10:30 | I think Donald Trump should complete the Mexico wall ASAP. I would go further and urge him to follow up with another on the US Canada border. If he then shuts down the air terminals and seaports we could have a dream situation where not a single Yank is able to get out of the country to screw up the rest of the world. That's what I think, anyway. | owdbuffer | |
27/1/2017 10:20 | No oilman. Most people say "could have, should have".Happy to help. | bobobobobobob | |
27/1/2017 10:00 | Just about to get 100k | sirmark | |
27/1/2017 09:36 | Lardner I will comment just a little. Jon effectively had a gun to his head in regards arbitration from both the KRG and the Bondholders. Damned if he did damned if he didn't. Either way shareholders would lose. People say "he could of should of" but I think realistically most so called options were non starters due to the extremely bad hand he had dealt to him by the previous BoD and the corrupt manner the country operates. | oilman63 | |
27/1/2017 07:50 | No bigdog I didn't mean that . | ccr1958 | |
27/1/2017 07:17 | bobobobobobob - 26 Jan 2017 - 18:18 - 533033 of 533054 - 3Not another multi Paul? Is the Chester mincer ccr a friend or family member? Maybe huge losses runs in the blood.And I take it any friends are south of Manchester - given you are responsible for 30% of the long term unemployed in Blackburn. | hearts1 | |
26/1/2017 22:56 | Sorry I dozed off. | oilman63 | |
26/1/2017 22:30 | No, I don't suppose you can. | lardner23 | |
26/1/2017 22:29 | I can't comment on that. | oilman63 | |
26/1/2017 22:25 | It does seem par for the course with GKP, that as and when various people discover the dubious things that have been going on, rather than do the honourable thing and blow the whistle, to a man they are happy to sit on their hands, shut their mouths and thereby become totally complicit, indirectly causing a lot of people to lose a lot of money. Such people can no doubt sleep quite easily. | lardner23 | |
26/1/2017 22:07 | Did OM ever find a Woolies to drop his trousers in? Is Oilman rewriting history by claiming to know what has been going on....when in reality, every one of his posts clearly demonstrates that he hasn't got a clue. Not a bloody clue. | bobobobobobob | |
26/1/2017 21:56 | I don't even bother with IR now WR , last 3 times I did they didn't reply .How OM and his delusioned followers can still post after the M&G farce is extraordinary , the brass neck of it ! I am not remotely interested in what they say , it has always been garbage. | nestoframpers | |
26/1/2017 21:51 | #533044 like what? a restructure at 0.83p that handed the asset to the bondholders on a plate? or the punishing assumptions of a CPR that isn't a CPR but an 'audit' of the field development plan phase zero? | wildrider7 | |
26/1/2017 21:39 | He was interviewed by SM and AS. Who gave SM and AS their jobs ??? Bob has Jon's mobile number and his personal email so why are you ringing reception ??? You and the rest of TeamBob have been wasting your time. | oilman63 | |
26/1/2017 21:29 | ccr1958 26 Jan '17 - 14:56 - 533024 of 533038 8 3 "Afternoon JB, I see the potless, shirtless, losers are still on here lying the ass`s off, shame on them !! I cant read them as they are filtered but I only have to see the liars avatars" !! Edit, You mean those posters that stated shareholders wont lose 95% of the company, there won't be billions of new shares issued, there is no need for a restructure, the bonds can be easily sorted out and extended for years and there won't be a consolidation? | bigdog5 | |
26/1/2017 21:29 | Who gave Jon his job ??? very good question, you can't even find an RNS that tells when he was actually appointed. talking about good corporate governance! if you call the company you never get passed the reception, and the receptionist, seem to have a big issue just giving her name a non company, that's what we ended with | wildrider7 | |
26/1/2017 21:22 | And as I said THINGS CHANGE And I think certain people were misled by the KRG. Who gave Jon his job ??? Why do you think Nads came in ??? | oilman63 | |
26/1/2017 21:13 | and also i do not trust you one bit. You campaigned really hard for board changes and we ended up with a board that sold us to the bondholders handed back 3 licences at a cost gave the bond holders 65% of the only remaining asset for buttons (less than 150mil) a board that is even less transparent than the previous one and finally that reward themselves with HUGE bonuses for failure .................... here a few other gems of yours ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ THE NEW GKP / Drilling for Super Giants (moderated) - GKP Oilman63 - 29 May 2015 - 16:00:29 - 424714 Dosh You can stop calling it a non-company now. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ==> you couldn't make it up!!!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Oilman63 12 Aug'15 - 09:23 - 437970 Good Morning Guys, This is a new management now and previous antics will not be tolerated. In the past there has been communication sent from the company to individual shareholders that has painted other shareholders in a very bad light, thus encouraging shareholders like Bob to actively attack those shareholders on online bulletin boards. I am in possession of such communication and so is Jon Ferrier. I think under the new regime any member of staff communicating in such a way will face instant dismissal. What went on before is not acceptable now by this current management. There is a growing desire with some concerned (and that is more than one person) with very large, very well funded legal departments that think the whole of the 2012 BOD should be brought to account for what is considered to be some of the misleading statements that were put out around the time. There is also a train of thought that certain characters on the Internet forums who posted misleading statements to tarnish individuals or organizations should be brought to account. These people don't need to go to court, they can be simply penalized with the cost of litigation. What people were led to believe by characters like Bob was completely incorrect and just another one of his delusional campaigns. As I said at the beginning this is a completely new management and should be viewed as such. They are doing the best they can with the tools they have. I'm confident they will be addressing a lot of shareholders concerns in the coming weeks. Watch this space... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ==> you couldn't make it up!!! | wildrider7 | |
26/1/2017 21:05 | He's not very well this week is our Adnan. But you wouldn't know that would you or the relevance. | oilman63 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions