We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Goodwin Plc | GDWN | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
7,160.00 | 7,160.00 | 7,320.00 | 7,220.00 | 7,000.00 |
Industry Sector |
---|
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 24/12/2024 07:48 by redartbmud GarbetAs an investor in Goodwin, you have to understand the family and the way they manage. They own 52 - 54% of the company combined so have control. Their strategy is long-term and high quality. When its' right, its' right. They will tell you when its' right at the right time. red |
Posted at 21/12/2024 00:27 by tudes100 I haven't copied the whole article for obvious reasons but most relevant part below ;The shipbuilding program’s problems are endemic to the U.S. industrial base. As manufacturing moved offshore and capital and labor migrated to more lucrative fields, the associated managerial know-how and skilled labor have atrophied. That now looks like a threat to U.S. economic and military security as China’s industrial prowess and strategic threat have grown. In the past three years, China has built 47% of all the world’s ships, and the U.S. just 0.1%, according to United Nations data. China’s shipyards build both commercial and military vessels, a significant strategic advantage. From 2014 to 2023, China’s navy launched 157 ships while the U.S. launched 67, according to independent defense analyst Tom Shugart. The U.S. is now trying to build capacity in sectors from semiconductors to renewable energy, in part by sending a “demand signal” to investors and workers. Subsidies to semiconductor plants, for example, signal to students there are careers in making chips. The demand signal for warships faded after the Cold War ended. Submarine production slumped from 3.8 a year in the 1980s to 0.7 in the 1990s, according to Eric Labs, a navy analyst at the Congressional Budget Office. It flickered to life again in the 2000s amid China’s growing threat and the need to replace aging ships. Warship tonnage under construction went from 68,000 in 2014 to 123,000 this year, Labs estimates. Under the Navy’s latest plan, that would reach 167,000 in 2034. But shipyards will struggle to meet that goal. Since 2019, the Navy has planned on three subs (two attack, one ballistic) a year, but actual production has been just half that, Labs estimates. The number of suppliers has shrunk dramatically, creating additional chokepoints. One source of delays on subs were problems at a sole supplier of large castings such as of rudders. HII has since added two suppliers in the U.K. |
Posted at 17/12/2024 09:14 by cfro I wouldn't bother using the PEG ratio as a valuation metric, not for this company or any company, it's a meaningless tool..A company of this calibre and quality is highly unlikely to be priced on a multiple of less than 20. Most of us here are very long term investors. I am not worried about 2025 results more like 2035.. |
Posted at 09/10/2024 09:23 by bottomfisher Goodwin has long operated below the radar screens of all but its most loyal fans. It has never courted investor attention before. So what should be made of its appointment of Berenberg as its Joint Corporate Broker with immediate effect, alongside Shore Capital?It is trading on a p/e of over 30 and a yield of 1.9% so it cannot claim to be heavily undervalued as is the case with other quoted family controlled businesses. It has never commissioned or supported any broker research, and does not need to raise capital since it bought back a hefty chunk of its shares at £48 a year and a half ago. So what is the point of adding a second corporate broker? Could it have anything to do with the roll-out of its new startup businesses - Duvelco and AVD - which lie outside the company's traditional areas of competence? |
Posted at 25/9/2024 17:15 by cfro Update out. Looks like more patience needed so no surprises there then lol for us v long term investors..Group moving forward slowly. New Non-exec appointment. |
Posted at 13/8/2024 14:43 by alexisk Janeann -- recent fsll is probably nothing to do with current trading or prospects. A few weeks ago there was a flurry of buying connected with GDWN joining the FTSE 250, which drove the price up. Since then, investors have maybe been looking at the share price being around 30x current earnings, which is quite high, and have been raking profits. Still a great company with excellent prospects IMHO. |
Posted at 07/8/2024 20:49 by trombone_89 I am waiting for someone to tell me why 84 times free cash flow, which may actually be one of the highest valuations in all of Europe, is not horrendously overvaluedGive me the bull view It's amazing all these years and years of investors refuses to actually engage on why this is a buy when I'm the one pointing out 84x free cash flow, 35x pe Investors could really find themselves in trouble here if this trades down to 20x pe which many would say is a reasonable premium industrial valuation level not 35x |
Posted at 07/8/2024 20:16 by redartbmud Until today the loony had made only 13 posts.Seasoned investor?? Don't feed the troll. red |
Posted at 25/5/2024 12:47 by cfro In the Sunday Times rich list publication from last weekend i saw that they had Tim Goodwin at no. 12 in the 40yo and under category with total wealth of £245m..I am not sure how they exactly came about that figure as the shareholdings are spread across the family and generations.. Just an aside, i was looking through all their various divisions recently and came across "Internet Central" I can't say that i had ever seen this mentioned in any of their communications to investors in all the time i have been invested here. Is this a new division? Anybody else know anything about this one? |
Posted at 29/4/2024 07:07 by shanklin If investors haven't got £70, they probably shouldn't be buying shares |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions