We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Flowgroup | FLOW | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.0145 | 0.0145 |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 25/5/2018 12:50 by ny boy (INFA) is attractive savvy investors, pls dyor as usual,don’t see much more left in this one, smart money has exited before the plug is pulled. They have already said shareholders will get nothing! |
Posted at 27/4/2018 15:27 by ny boy Investors back in love with (PREM), something interesting going on there? Dyor as usual |
Posted at 17/4/2018 06:13 by gertie2shoes A pretty turgid end. A rat of a CEO in Stiff and changing government policies led investors up the garden path. |
Posted at 10/4/2018 09:34 by pwhite73 1fox1 When you break it down you're saying the exactly same thing as me. It was a failed business model that they managed to keep going for X amount of years by trying to persuade investors profitability was just around the corner. Market conditions and regulations have toughened since then to the point they cannot raise anymore money. But all this is a long way from fraud say unlike MTV that was raising money for a business that technically did not exist. When a company folds and has assets to sell it general indicates a bad business not a fraud. |
Posted at 10/4/2018 08:54 by 1fox1 Ant. Sorry matey your last posts were telling investors to go long. You got this one wrong |
Posted at 10/4/2018 08:40 by pwhite73 The business model was real it just failed. The two main institution investors Palm and Lombard have lost millions in this. Don't confuse Flow with AIM stocks where there is no business or what little business exists is just a front to steal PI money. |
Posted at 10/4/2018 08:21 by 1fox1 Errrrh hate to tell you all but........ I TOLD YOU SO. Now let's push for an investigation. This company has done little more than steal money off investors and shareholders alike. |
Posted at 04/4/2018 10:16 by 1fox1 Graham my memory is very good. That is the problem for people like you. I know you like to say the boiler is history. It is now all about the energy company. Sorry mate it doesn't work like that. This company has scammed past investors out of a lot of money. If someone robbed your house and sh&gged your misses would you invite him round for tea the next day? I think not. |
Posted at 21/2/2018 14:57 by 1fox1 I can't wait for this to go to the wall. Long term investors were lied to by fake RNS statements about a game changing boiler. I doubt that there ever was one that actually worked properly. These are the people I really feel sorry for. We were shafted by Tony Stiff and his cronies a long time ago. Any new investors deserve everything that's come to them. I and other investors warned them over and over again. The people who have been running this company in the past are in my opinion nothing but scum. The fraud office need to look into the goings on at this company over the past 4 years. Jail isn't good enough for these w*nkers |
Posted at 21/12/2017 09:03 by zulu_principle The shares are essentially being soaked up by the market makers and aren’t necessarily being acquired by the institutions. Market makers have an obligation to buy shares in the companies they deal in at their stated prices. If they have too many / too few shares in a given company they accordingly walk the price down or up in an attempt to bring their holdings back into an acceptable state of balance.“A market maker is a broker that assumes the risk of holding a certain number of shares of a particular security in order to facilitate the trading of that security in order to keep the financial markets liquid. If investors are looking to sell a security market makers continue to purchase that security until all sellers are satisfied. Conversely, if investors are buying a security, market makers continue to sell that security until all orders are filled. Market makers, therefore, satisfy the supply and demand of the financial markets and keep securities changing hands. All market makers are compensated for the risk of holding assets by stating a buy / sell spread on each security that they cover.” Worth bearing in mind the circa 5 million net sales / uncertains from yesterday would only have cost the FLOW market makers £25k between them – small change. The institutional investors here can essentially wait until the company runs out of working capital before deciding whether to convert their loans at virtually zero per share and wipe out the remaining shareholders. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions