Feedback Share Discussion Threads

[ged5] 13/11/2023 12:28

Thank you! I was getting 79.9 to buy but just over 75p to sell.

[digger2779] 13/11/2023 12:09

I've been quoted 78p to buy 5000 and 79.9 to buy 7000. I won't be doing either!!!

76.25 to sell btw

[lr2] 13/11/2023 11:41

I suspect they are just shares being moved from one account to another owned by the same person. If they aren't then they are sells.

[ged5] 13/11/2023 11:35

Are these 78p trades buys or sells?

[yump] 12/11/2023 14:10

Whatever the results of the Palantir trials, its unfortunate that the privacy issue is often exaggerated and triggers paranoia. The idea that a government/public owned organisation would be more secure is daft, because the risk is not necessarily from sold data but from rogue nations/hacking.

The systems failures in public services are always attributed to the private businesses, but from my limited experience, the project managers in the public organisations are not the best in class and there is a lack of coordination between the demands of different departments in constructing the specifications.

[ducatiman] 12/11/2023 13:24

That’s great comfort LR2. Could be just spin.

[ged5] 12/11/2023 11:51

Palantir have been trying to get their hands on NHS data for several years. I posted this link on another thread back in July 2020:



Just seen the last part of your post so will have a look.

[lr2] 12/11/2023 11:20

It doesn't sound promising for Palantir, Yump.

The following is from the Doctors' Association UK site.
_______________________________________________________

We have concerns about value for money, benefit to the NHS and effectiveness of the FDP. Please address these concerns during a pause.

Of the pilots that ran, 11 of the 36 were suspended or paused in March. According to the FDP FAQ webpage, only one has restarted. We are concerned that such a large amount of money could be spent on a product that seems to have failed in approximately one third of its test cases.

Colleagues at some of the pilot trusts reported troubling details about the pilots. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital reported that the Palantir pilot: “didn’t meet our needs”. The New York Times reported that Palantir’s Foundry at Milton Keynes University Hospital Trust, didn’t work with the hospital’s systems, forcing staff to enter data manually.

Lastly, we understand that the directors from pilot trusts were recently asked by NHS executives to sign a letter supporting the FDP. Only 16 officials signed, suggesting most trusts who trialled Foundry did not feel able to endorse the FDP. Please provide more information about these failed pilots, guidance on what lessons have been learned and assurances that this new system will work as it needs to for patients.
_______________________________________________________

Ged / Duc, if you read this, note the reference to the Milton Keynes University Hospital Trust and my cryptic post #11051. Will we be hearing more about Milton Keynes soon?

[yump] 12/11/2023 10:01

ged5
Thanks - yes looks much the same.

[lr2] 11/11/2023 23:03

More money available for Bleepa perhaps?

Doctors urge minister to rethink plan to hand £480m NHS deal to US firm Palantir



Doctors call for pause in NHS Federated Date Platform contract

[ged5] 09/11/2023 14:37

Yump, I had a bit of time on my hands. This was the link LR2 gave in post 10548. First glance it looks the same wording.

[yump] 09/11/2023 13:37

I’ll have a look back. Just wondering if the latest wording is a bit more specific than the original. Ie if they actually want fdbk, then it would be perfectly ok to make the brief such that time is not wasted by other businesses tendering when they don’t meet all the criteria. A small point really.

[ged5] 09/11/2023 09:53

Ducatiman, thanks to Bill for pointing out that it was mentioned in a link given in the Bidstack document.

II.2.14) Additional information: Whilst the procurement is ongoing, the Trust intends to enter into a short contract extension with its incumbent CDC pilot provider to ensure ongoing patient care. Service continuation is vital for the Trust and its patients.



Yump a link was almost certainly given earlier on this thread but whether it still works I've no idea. Not sure why you want it.

[yump] 09/11/2023 09:17

Anyone got a link to the original procurement note from QV - I wonder if the wording is different now.

[ducatiman] 08/11/2023 17:23

If it’s “critical̶1; for Queen Victoria CDC then surely it must also be critical for the other 160 CDCs.
Ged, perhaps the winning bidder will fill the gap as a goodwill gesture.

[ged5] 08/11/2023 12:52

From the RNS 4th April 2023:-

This paid extension, which follows the success of the Company's existing contract (details of which were announced by Feedback on 6 September 2022), follows the abandonment of the Trust's previous procurement process in March 2023 and will cover the period from 1 April 2023 until 31 December 2023 whilst QVH undertakes a new tender exercise under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. A new tender process for the next phase of the CDC programme rollout is due to commence imminently.



From the information LR2 alerted us to from Barnacle's post:-

Delivery
18 Mar 2024 to 18 Mar 2026



There appears to be a 3 month gap with no digital platform requirement to provide a way of delivering care, connecting teams flexibly over a distance and equipping them with the information they need to make informed clinical decisions.

But Tom Oakley said in the RNS:-The digital component of CDC delivery that Feedback provides is critical.

So will they get another interim contract as well?

[brian1944] 08/11/2023 11:22

LR2 nice info thanks lets hope we get the contract

[yump] 08/11/2023 09:52

Is there anything else that can deliver this securely:

“ connecting teams flexibly over a distance”

[lr2] 08/11/2023 09:37

Courtesy of Barnacle over on the other place.
_____________________________________________

Well, here it is.......... and valued at £2M!

Provision of a Digital Communication Platform for the Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC)

Duration 2 year

Value £2M

Published 06 Nov 2023

Delivery 18 Mar 2024 to 18 Mar 2026

Deadline 07 Dec 2023 14:01

Description

Queen Victoria NHS Foundation Trust is looking to award a contract for the provision of a Digital Communication Platform for the Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) along with the ongoing maintenance and support for 2 years with +1+1 options for extending. The primary aim of the digital platform requirement is to provide a way of delivering care, connecting teams flexibly over a distance and equipping them with the information they need to make informed clinical decisions
_____________________________________________

[lr2] 07/11/2023 13:45

Not quite but today's trade is her original amount. Stop calling Annemjin a bloke and you might see the amended amount appear soon.

[ducatiman] 07/11/2023 13:05

Has Ms
Eschauzier repurchased?
Then inadvertently sold? Lol.

[lr2] 06/11/2023 23:00

Hey Trevor, I see you told your fans (both of them) over at IQAI that you sold 2.675 million shares in IQAI in the last month.
I guess you're planning to invest the cash you raised into Feedback, hence your little poke here to try and bring the price down before entering. Sneaky boy!

[yump] 06/11/2023 12:30

What a nice way to occupy your day. Is it that empty ?

One thing is 100% certain.

If the contract that FDBK thought they had, hadn't been withdrawn by the NHS for whatever they need to do with it, you wouldn't have been back here.

Not that integrity is exactly the preserve of a lot of posters on ADVFN.