Feedback Share Discussion Threads

[ducatiman] 14/5/2020 10:35

And for that reason it will Yump!!

[yump] 14/5/2020 10:11

A few will still be sitting on a decent short term profit but it can't be many at this price now. As you say, not much required - but it does need to happen in the next few months I think !

[ged5] 14/5/2020 09:49

That situation could be changed here in a flash.

[yump] 14/5/2020 09:45

Meanwhile here we’re refreshingly free of ramping - its clearly not a ‘chosen one’

[lukehold] 14/5/2020 08:37

You're on filter for most, you're the cause. Let's see how you behave today

[yump] 14/5/2020 08:30

Yes filter is the best option. Takes a while to decide - sometimes something useful pops up unexpectedly. However, some responses are impulsive but some are obviously designed to keep your comments away from somewhere else.

There is also a block-out tactic used on some threads where a burst of posts meets anythijng negative you raise.

I dont think its paranoid to assume that all sorts of deliberate behaviour takes place where large amounts of money are at stake.

[lr2] 14/5/2020 00:57

Keeping well thanks Ged. I don't give the nutters much of my time hence my very long filter list.

Wash hands, take vitamin D, and use mosquito repellent (citriodiol).

[ged5] 13/5/2020 23:14

Seems about the right number.

How are you LR2? We do seem to attract our fair share of nutters!

[lr2] 13/5/2020 21:49

My filter list is 2,119 strong. I credit my remaining sanity to that list.

[ged5] 13/5/2020 21:00

Sorry Brasso, Ducatiman is correct. I'm not going to pay £20+ per month just to moderate a thread.

You've done the right thing. My filter list is ever growing as well.

Yump, I know you don't like filtering but on this occasion will you please do so. I also made an error of judgement in trying to engage but I've now realised my mistake.
Sonie is correct some of us value your contributions.

Lukehold, please take your grievance elsewhere.

[ducatiman] 13/5/2020 18:42

He’s not blue Brasso

[brasso3] 13/5/2020 18:16

Ged

Can you moderate these posts?

Lukehold13 May '20 - 12:26 - 5405 of 5410 (Filtered)

yump13 May '20 - 16:06 - 5406 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:08 - 5407 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:08 - 5408 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:13 - 5409 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:14 - 5410 of 5410 (Filtered)

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 18:14

Can we talk about bleepa and their privacy policy...

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 18:08

How's therapy working out today yump. I see a lot of self soothing past losses on the boards again..

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 18:08

I suppose its to be expected. If people can't produce a proper argument about their own share, on their own thread, go and throw some poo at the visitors.-- This well crafted verse is worthy of shake spear's own notepad.Let's take a moment to appreciate it.

[yump] 13/5/2020 16:06

I can't see the post, but that username looks familiar - is it another stalker ?
I suppose its to be expected. If people can't produce a proper argument about their own share, on their own thread, go and throw some poo at the visitors.

At least I can see the proper contributions here.

I guess nothing much will happen here for a while. In theory the expanded trial should mean quicker approval. Unless the official trial has been disrupted and therefore not being assessed as it would have been, although that would be the very depths of bureaucratic management at work !

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 12:26

Who hasn't been civil. You'll see, give it a few months, yump will start with his sour depressing posts, blaming others for his poor judgment

[andymunchkin] 13/5/2020 12:13

yumpIs alowlife scmbag hisUsualPattern buyPump sell deramp rinse&repeat

[yump] 13/5/2020 11:41

o/t

Its just the way some people are. I have been very negative on some shares. They are usually ones where there is no debate at all and all negatives are dismissed, especially at the start - often when 'new' money is raised or there is a name change and some sort of new initiative for a failed share. When you do that, there's often someone who follows you to whatever shares you post on, rather than just arguing on that particular share. Its allowed on bb's but not in real life !

I'm always curious (suspicious) on those shares why there is so much effort put into defending everything.

Been here a long time and if I could be bothered I'd draw some sort of graph of defense effort vs. subsequent share performance. The ones that come to mind all went bust and took investors money with them.

Here's hoping FDBK don't change their name to 'Medipic' ;-)

[yump] 13/5/2020 10:28

For the sake of other posters I suggest we stop. Consider you’ve won something if you want.

Lets just try to make valid points.

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 09:09

There you go, you learnt what a writedown is and how to spell Shakespeare. Gold star. Keep up the good work. You have quite a reputation as the moron on the other boards, fdbk and immo board will be no different in time.

[yump] 13/5/2020 08:20

Can't you read ?

You can have a pop at me over and over, but you're looking a bit daft by totally misquoting me and then producing a spreadsheet to show that the NHS spend money.
Wow, I never knew that !

Perhaps you don't want to understand, but I'll repeat just in case:
At the time of covid, Bleepa was under trial. No revenue.

We all know there is no revenue. Some people are impatient for revenue, but that won't happen while the product is still under trial. That particularly applies to the NHS.

Just find some decent points to argue with and let go of the ego.

Have you looked up 'write-down' yet to find out what it means ?

To be fair to you, I don't think the point of your posts has anything to do with FDBK has it ?

You're just a bit sore that I reappeared recently on a couple of the shares you and others ramp, where any negative views are not even discussed. Not when they are first brought up and not ever.

You can talk to yourself now if you want, have the last word and pretend you've won something.

I take back the Shakespeare comment. That was an unfair challenge. It would never happen for you.