Feedback Share Discussion Threads

[ged5] 13/5/2020 23:14

Seems about the right number.

How are you LR2? We do seem to attract our fair share of nutters!

[lr2] 13/5/2020 21:49

My filter list is 2,119 strong. I credit my remaining sanity to that list.

[ged5] 13/5/2020 21:00

Sorry Brasso, Ducatiman is correct. I'm not going to pay £20+ per month just to moderate a thread.

You've done the right thing. My filter list is ever growing as well.

Yump, I know you don't like filtering but on this occasion will you please do so. I also made an error of judgement in trying to engage but I've now realised my mistake.
Sonie is correct some of us value your contributions.

Lukehold, please take your grievance elsewhere.

[ducatiman] 13/5/2020 18:42

He’s not blue Brasso

[brasso3] 13/5/2020 18:16

Ged

Can you moderate these posts?

Lukehold13 May '20 - 12:26 - 5405 of 5410 (Filtered)

yump13 May '20 - 16:06 - 5406 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:08 - 5407 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:08 - 5408 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:13 - 5409 of 5410 (Filtered)

Lukehold13 May '20 - 18:14 - 5410 of 5410 (Filtered)

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 18:14

Can we talk about bleepa and their privacy policy...

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 18:08

How's therapy working out today yump. I see a lot of self soothing past losses on the boards again..

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 18:08

I suppose its to be expected. If people can't produce a proper argument about their own share, on their own thread, go and throw some poo at the visitors.-- This well crafted verse is worthy of shake spear's own notepad.Let's take a moment to appreciate it.

[yump] 13/5/2020 16:06

I can't see the post, but that username looks familiar - is it another stalker ?
I suppose its to be expected. If people can't produce a proper argument about their own share, on their own thread, go and throw some poo at the visitors.

At least I can see the proper contributions here.

I guess nothing much will happen here for a while. In theory the expanded trial should mean quicker approval. Unless the official trial has been disrupted and therefore not being assessed as it would have been, although that would be the very depths of bureaucratic management at work !

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 12:26

Who hasn't been civil. You'll see, give it a few months, yump will start with his sour depressing posts, blaming others for his poor judgment

[andymunchkin] 13/5/2020 12:13

yumpIs alowlife scmbag hisUsualPattern buyPump sell deramp rinse&repeat

[yump] 13/5/2020 11:41

o/t

Its just the way some people are. I have been very negative on some shares. They are usually ones where there is no debate at all and all negatives are dismissed, especially at the start - often when 'new' money is raised or there is a name change and some sort of new initiative for a failed share. When you do that, there's often someone who follows you to whatever shares you post on, rather than just arguing on that particular share. Its allowed on bb's but not in real life !

I'm always curious (suspicious) on those shares why there is so much effort put into defending everything.

Been here a long time and if I could be bothered I'd draw some sort of graph of defense effort vs. subsequent share performance. The ones that come to mind all went bust and took investors money with them.

Here's hoping FDBK don't change their name to 'Medipic' ;-)

[yump] 13/5/2020 10:28

For the sake of other posters I suggest we stop. Consider you’ve won something if you want.

Lets just try to make valid points.

[lukehold] 13/5/2020 09:09

There you go, you learnt what a writedown is and how to spell Shakespeare. Gold star. Keep up the good work. You have quite a reputation as the moron on the other boards, fdbk and immo board will be no different in time.

[yump] 13/5/2020 08:20

Can't you read ?

You can have a pop at me over and over, but you're looking a bit daft by totally misquoting me and then producing a spreadsheet to show that the NHS spend money.
Wow, I never knew that !

Perhaps you don't want to understand, but I'll repeat just in case:
At the time of covid, Bleepa was under trial. No revenue.

We all know there is no revenue. Some people are impatient for revenue, but that won't happen while the product is still under trial. That particularly applies to the NHS.

Just find some decent points to argue with and let go of the ego.

Have you looked up 'write-down' yet to find out what it means ?

To be fair to you, I don't think the point of your posts has anything to do with FDBK has it ?

You're just a bit sore that I reappeared recently on a couple of the shares you and others ramp, where any negative views are not even discussed. Not when they are first brought up and not ever.

You can talk to yourself now if you want, have the last word and pretend you've won something.

I take back the Shakespeare comment. That was an unfair challenge. It would never happen for you.

[lukehold] 12/5/2020 19:56

Also it's Shakespeare not shakes spear. That was irritating me since yesterday you prize clown

[lukehold] 12/5/2020 19:51

How’s therapy working out yump. I see a lot of self soothing past losses on the boards again..

As for ‘Trashing the share with bogus arguments’ that’s rich isn’t it.


I’ll await the bogus arguments to be disproved.. Your claim that you can’t just sell things to the NHS isn’t going to cut it.

[yump] 12/5/2020 17:53

You can’t suddenly sell something to the nhs or set dates after which you will charge them, when the product is still undergoing trials.

Not in the real world anyway.

The whole point is the unexpected opportunity for wider exposure for a new product.

The point about cash is irrelevant unless someone is intent on trashing the share with bogus ‘argumentsR17;.

The lack of revenue for bleepa is a known. An inevitable at this stage.

Accelerated approval will likely be the best outcome.

[ged5] 12/5/2020 17:40

No problem, Lukehold. The problem here is there's no clarity about figures. The problem has been around since before Tom Oakley arrived on the scene and the only common denominator that I can see is Lindsay Melvin.

My apologies if I misjudged your purpose here. You said you sold out but it sounds like you must have seen some potential and you're annoyed as the rest of us about the seeming lack of progress.

Six weeks this coming Friday, Ducatiman!

[lukehold] 12/5/2020 17:17

I was using it to highlight the poor judgment in giving bleepa away with a unspecified timeframe

[lukehold] 12/5/2020 17:14

Hi Ged, happy to be corrected. Just my quick calcs looking at last reported available cash and projected burn rate.

[ducatiman] 12/5/2020 17:06

News must be “imminent̶1; Sonie, lol.

[sonie01] 12/5/2020 16:01

Here we go, under 1p again!