ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

EMH European Metals Holdings Limited

20.00
0.50 (2.56%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
European Metals Holdings Limited LSE:EMH London Ordinary Share VGG3191T1021 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.50 2.56% 20.00 20.00 20.50 20.50 19.20 19.50 587,534 16:35:25
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Miscellaneous Metal Ores,nec 1.12M -5.93M -0.0286 -7.08 41.98M
European Metals Holdings Limited is listed in the Miscellaneous Metal Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker EMH. The last closing price for European Metals was 19.50p. Over the last year, European Metals shares have traded in a share price range of 11.75p to 49.00p.

European Metals currently has 207,324,705 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of European Metals is £41.98 million. European Metals has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -7.08.

European Metals Share Discussion Threads

Showing 2501 to 2523 of 4650 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  102  101  100  99  98  97  96  95  94  93  92  91  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
23/2/2017
07:47
Shares fell heavily on ASX overnight - now $1.12AUS or 69p.
bookwormrobert
23/2/2017
07:23
Proactive article:

European Metals has a large, low-cost, lithium project right on the German border
Share
12:39 22 Feb 2017
European Metals now has the largest lithium resource in Europe
European Metals has a large, low-cost, lithium project right on the German border
Drill core from Cinovec
How many ten-baggers have there been in mining over the past few years? These have been lean times, so you’d think the answer would be not many, and you’d be right.

But European Metals Holdings Limited (LON:EMH) (ASX:EMH) is the exception that proves the rule, or just about.

Shareholders who bought in at the time the shares listed on Aim are now sitting on nearly seven times their money, as the price has rocketed from 10.75p on the first day of dealings in December 2015 to 75.25 now.

Whether many shareholders actually did buy in on that day is open to question, since the company already had an Australian listing, and in subsequent months the shares came under some pressure on the downside as liquidity dried up after some initial enthusiasm.

By February of 2016, they had drifted to 5.125p.

But what a turnaround since then. The lithium market was already flying, but it was at that point that European Metals started to post really encouraging news from its Cinovec project in the Czech Republic.

There was an announcement on metallurgy, following a A$1.75 mln fundraising, and suddenly the shares started to move – to the point where European Metals had to issue a statement to say that was “not aware” of any reason for what it called the “significant increase” in the company’s share price to 14.75p.

There was a lot more to come after that though. In the months that followed, as lithium continued to ride high in investors’ minds, with talk of Tesla, electric cars, ballooning battery use and lithium brine companies popping up all over Canada, European Metals made steady progress at Cinovec.

In May there was a drilling and resource update, in July an update on pre-feasibility work, in September news of likely capital cost savings that run to the tune of US$85 mln.

Fast forward into February 2017 and the latest round of drilling at Cinovec has been completed, the company is making moves towards securing a mining license, and chief executive Keith Coughlan is feeling distinctly upbeat. The resource has just been established at nearly 11 mln tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent.

“We’re within two months of finishing our pre-feasibility study now,” he says. “And at that point we’ll be able to show hard numbers. The key things will be the net present value, the capital expenditure and the operating costs.”

And it’s here, in the realm of costs, that Coughlan reckons European Metals has a real advantage.

Because while Cinovec is relatively low grade, the costs of getting lithium carbonate out of the ground will be very low indeed.

That’s because the type of ore that hosts the lithium at Cinovec is mica, while most other hard rock lithium deposits are hosted in spodumene, and it takes more heat and more reagent to extract value from spodumene than it does from mica.

“We don’t have to heat it to anywhere near the same temperature,” says Coughlan. “That means our operating cost is going to be very much in the bottom end of the global cost curve.”

And given the size of Cinovec, that should make for quite some operation. “We have the largest lithium resource in Europe,” says Coughlan. “We have the fourth largest non-brine resource in the world. And it could be bigger, but we’re not bothering with that for now.”

The location is ideal too. The Czech Republic is a relatively benign operating environment for miners, but perhaps more significantly, Cinovec sits right on the German border. And who’s going to be buying lithium by the crate-load? – German carmakers.

“At the moment,” says Coughlan, “the lithium market has pretty much been cornered by the Chinese. Europe is going to have to get into it from other sources. And we have a large, low-cost, long-term source of lithium right on the German border.”

Money will be needed, of course, to build the mine, but here too Coughlan is pretty confident.

“The numbers are compelling so I don’t see any problems getting that money raised,” he says. “Once we’ve done the pre-feasibility study we’ll roll straight into the bankable study and then raise the money to build it. The capex will be pretty inoffensive.”

After that, construction is likely to take between 12 and 24 months, at which point European lithium supplies will become that much more secure. And in a world where protectionism is making a sudden and rapid return, the importance of that may come to be much more widely appreciated.

myst1
22/2/2017
23:23
agreed melody.

in a similar vein, bacanora [funnily enough], didn't tie up all the sonora prospects, because alix resources and lithium australia took on tecolote and tule to the north/south and on lithium bearing trend.

details here, [old article - see map]


in a further twist, he he he, emh and lithium australia for a time had working relationship on the metallurgy front. lol, these lithium companies sure like to swing.

recap
emh/bacanora = neighbours
bacanora/[alix + lit aus] = neighbours
emh/lit aus had a fling!

wrtmf
22/2/2017
19:24
I suspect its wrong for us to criticise our BOD when we do not know about the situation. Maybe they did look at Cinnwald and decided no for a particular reason. Does every shop in the high street buy the shop next door just because it is for sale?

More important is that you focus on delivering something rather than expanding the possibilities - especially when you are comfortable with the size / quality of your existing asset. And the market will be large enough for multiple players.

melody9999
21/2/2017
20:44
BCN did not pay 35 million, that is just spin, they paid 5 million for 50% with an option to buy the second 50% at 30 million, which is rather different, and much nicer from BCN's point of view.

If they don't like the results, or if resource prices fall, they can negotiate the price down, regardless they get to keep their 50%. They can also take up in 2 years and/or sell on immediately at a higher price with minimal cash being tied up in the meantime.

This small expenditure will make cash raising for their other projects significantly easier, and pay for itself in that way alone imo.

banshee
21/2/2017
20:01
What, like tin?!

LMFBO

ahbroad
21/2/2017
19:41
Myst1 - It all depends on how you look at things. Cinovec is nearing completion of its preliminary feasibility study, not even its definitive bankable feasibility study, but EMH's market cap is 95 million pounds. If this was any other metal than lithium, things would be very different indeed.
bookwormrobert
21/2/2017
18:57
Bookworm,

I can't believe you see this as negative. It just endorses the value of Cinovec.

See copy of tweet below from David lenigas (REM):

Interesting to see BCN just bought in to the smaller part of the Cinovec Lithium deposit for a stonking €35m. Makes Cinovec really valuable.

The BCN deal on mini Cinovec makes EMH's Cinovec worth a massive amount. And @CzechLithium has tin! @keith_coughlan All good for @RareEMplc

EMH is CHEAP!

myst1
21/2/2017
18:25
Should have been easy to raise €5m to stop the competitors even if they've got no money themselves! But for processing etc this may turn out to be a good thing in the end.
runthejoules
21/2/2017
18:19
Emh still has the lithium and tin underground. It is still worth a very significant sum. They didn't need to buy across the border.
rafboy
21/2/2017
18:13
Get over it bookworm!
ahbroad
21/2/2017
16:39
I think we heard you the first ten times bookworm..........
herschel k
21/2/2017
16:32
If Cinovec is good then Cinnwald is good. It's the same deposit - just cut in two by a national border. Cinnwald is only partially explored, but its probably about 1/2 the size of Cinovec (rather than the figures quoted on this bulletin board). Speaking for myself, I think EMH's board has really screwed this up.
bookwormrobert
21/2/2017
16:19
Madness that people are selling...so short sighted
luisfrg
21/2/2017
16:18
surely then banshee, the question bookworm should be asking him/herself is.......is Cinnwald actually any good then?

H

herschel k
21/2/2017
16:01
Any potential bidder could have had 50% of Cinnwald for a few million Euros though, a trifling sum. I imagine Cinnwald themselves would have preferred a serious player to BCN as partner, but it seems no-one else was that motivated.
banshee
21/2/2017
15:58
doesn't make a blind bit of difference. The resource is completely different in terms of size, and economics (not to mention programme).

I think EMH have done the right thing here, and this only goes to show the value in what they have (and are progressing rapidly)

ahbroad
21/2/2017
15:45
For myself, every which way I turn today's announcement about Cinnwald, it seems to me highly beneficial to BCN, and a bad mistake by the EMH board. They've lost the exclusivity of their appeal. Now every company proposing to take EMH over will bargain EMH's price down by threatening to put their money in BCN / Cinnwald instead. Not good.
bookwormrobert
21/2/2017
15:14
Certainly if it had been our Serbian friends RTZ or similar, it would be seen as both a high quality validation of EMH and an obvious precursor of a bid. We'd be up 50% by now, from BCN though, it merely muddies the waters.
banshee
21/2/2017
13:09
Hi Banshee! Care to speculate on your own question?
bookwormrobert
21/2/2017
13:00
More interesting to me than the question of why BCN did this, is why didn't someone else who is neither BCN or EMH do it?
banshee
21/2/2017
12:25
Not sure if this interview has been posted.

hxxp://www.directorstalk.net/qa-keith-coughlan-managing-director-european-metals-holdings-ltd-lonemh-3/

qackers
21/2/2017
11:38
myst,

didn't you realise that Bacanora are soon going to raise money to build the world's biggest straw so they can suck the tin, lithium and other minerals from Cinovec via Zinnwald, right under EMH's noses?

:)

H

herschel k
Chat Pages: Latest  102  101  100  99  98  97  96  95  94  93  92  91  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock