Eurasia Mining Share Discussion Threads

[thebeastofbodmin] 15/9/2021 14:30

We all know how palladium will go once the higher rebound in auto's occur and it's not to $500 oz!
- hxxps://www.fxleaders.com/forecasts/commodities/palladium-price-forecast/

[purchaseatthetop] 15/9/2021 14:29

Jubbers....it freezes. Like the whole environment. Glad you raised that point. The EUA cobstruction plan on their presentation says 18 months to build the plant. Is that 18 working periods when they can build or can the build over the winter when everything is frozen?

[love_a_good_jubbing] 15/9/2021 14:15

Anyone want to help PATT out with his question seeing as he seems tongue tied :What happens to the flowing water in Murmansk over winter?

[love_a_good_jubbing] 15/9/2021 14:14

And none of them Tigerboy, not one of them, are predicting prices will return to $500. You have zero proof for your baseless claims the same as many other things said here. If prices fall the producers will throttle back production, same as every commodity ever. They know how to make a profit.

[tigerbythetail] 15/9/2021 13:56

Lord God, you're having this conversation about basic maths and you consider yourself competent to be investing your money in ultra high-risk shares like EUA?

[trickydickytwo] 15/9/2021 13:50

"lenoman is telling everyone to not take any notice which where TMS is concerned...."

And lenoman is what/who exactly?

TDT

[1liam] 15/9/2021 13:43

Great opportunity to top up at this price

[steelstones] 15/9/2021 13:43

also. 1x1 is 1. 1x2 is 2. 1+1 is 2 and 1+2 is 3. two different things

[steelstones] 15/9/2021 13:41

UKNIGHTED. You are still getting your terminology wrong. Yes, if you increase 1 by half you get half you 1.5 (because you are using addition) But if you multiple 1 by 0.5 you get 0.5!
to use your example. If you have £1 and increase it by 1.5 you would get £2.50. however if you thought you had £1 and you found out you had increased that by a multiple (times) of 1.5 you would have £1.50. The RNS is using multiples of what they thought they had, rather than telling you how much they have increased per se.
I get where you are coming from and for you it would have been easier to say weve increased from 1million to 1.7million rather than use a multiple.

[richie32] 15/9/2021 13:30

I guess it's profit takers who wanted to wait for the RNS before they sold (sell on news).

My gut feeling is it will keep going up but at a less steep rate than before only on the basis that I've seen this pattern a few times before

[love_a_good_jubbing] 15/9/2021 13:30

They've covered the financing previously and the rns was clear enough about being highlights not every last detail. Now this could be fun - tell me more about the climate around Monchegorsk... this wasteland you describe where it is almost impossible to do anything and at such high cost.

[purchaseatthetop] 15/9/2021 13:00

Beastofbodmin....are you as amused as us with the RNS. Now that is comedy gold. The mining plan that cannot say when it will start, how much it will cost, how it will be financed, what it will produce or when it will finish.

But evidently there are lots of streams around. Not surprised with the amount of snow.

[thebeastofbodmin] 15/9/2021 12:53

lenoman is telling everyone to not take any notice which where TMS is concerned is a given, however it is of course great for a good laugh which he also highlights.
COMEDY GOLD!

[purchaseatthetop] 15/9/2021 12:44

TMS.... lenoman is warning new investors on the LSE board not to read your posts here. It seems you are a mad bad person!

[1liam] 15/9/2021 12:35

Great opportunity to top up at this price

[love_a_good_jubbing] 15/9/2021 12:30

StorkyBoy stop trying to hide your friends errors. He claimed $500 for Pd and provided a link that says nothing to support his baseless claims. As for your latest round of claims, I will take issue with one in particular - where is this new capacity for Pd coming from, which mine is ready to go in next year or two ?I'll also point out again there is a lot more than just palladium on Kola. NN said as much in many annual reports with C1+C2 figures to support.

[uknighted] 15/9/2021 12:26

FFS

If you have £1 and you INCREASE BY half you have £1.50

If you have £1 and you INCREASE BY one time you have £2.00

If you have £1 and you INCREASE BY 1.5 times you have £2.50

If you have £1 and you INCREASE BY 2 times you have £3.00

etc. etc

Remember the RNS says INCREASE BY not INCREASE TO.

[flavio_monteiro] 15/9/2021 12:21

Thank MadStock

I would like a professional opinion on the forecast of Palladium that TIGER has been posting! ..thats why I have asked for a link from TIGER....not some anonymous poster on a BB hiding behind an ALIAS!

BTW..I do not use an Alias...

[spikeyj] 15/9/2021 12:14

flavio, ? perhaps your idea of the timescale for the “long run average”
on palladium is rather different from TBTT? - 12 months is not so ‘long’?

[themadstork] 15/9/2021 12:13

Flavio:

The short/medium term is irrelevant for undeveloped projects. It will be minimum 4 years before any mine at MT could be producing, with an LoM of 13-14 years after that.

Long term, which is all that matters to anyone thinking of financing a mine, the outlook for palladium is bleak due to

a)demise of ICEs and CCs, which account for 87% of demand for Pd
b)increase in supply from new mining capacity coming online and recovery of existing supply from Covid disruption.
c)huge glut of recycled material coming from all the newly-minted CCs following Dieselgate.

You'd have to be damn, damn, *damn* sure of the economics before risking hundreds of millions of capex on a mine that could well be uneconomic for much of its life. And thats if you know what the current economics of it are. Which any purchaser of MT would not, as there is no DFS. The idea that anyone would pay *anything* for MT currently is absolutely mental. It is worth nothing.