Environ.Recycle Share Discussion Threads

[perfect choice] 10/12/2010 18:23

Nice market visibility to help build up credibility, yes USA news would be very nice next week.

[mark30] 10/12/2010 17:44

Getting there Miranda.

Something from the US next ? .......hopfully

[mirandaj] 10/12/2010 17:32

Front Page of Materials Recycling Week



EcoSheet to be preferred hoarding on Bovis Lend Lease projects

Construction company Bovis Lend Lease has signed a framework agreement to use a recycled waste hoarding as a preferred solution.

The national framework agreement will see 2K Manufacturing's EcoSheet eSite hoarding panels in place of imported plywood on its construction projects as a preferred solution.

EcoSheet panels are made from low-grade, mixed waste plastics, which are recycled using the company's powder impression moulding process. The panels are also recyclable themselves at the end of their natural life.

Bovis Lend Lease head of procurement, supply chain and quality management Nigel McKay said: "This exciting and innovative new product would contribute towards Bovis Lend Lease's commitment to leaving a positive legacy from the construction projects that we are involved with, and having a positive effect on the environment with which we interact."

According to EcoSheet, 25 million plywood hoardings are used annually and use of the product could divert as much as 30,000 tonnes of waste from landfill a year.

EcoSheet has also signed national framework agreements with ISG Pearce and The Apollo Group

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 17:05

Thank you Hampster. Characteristically civil of you. By no means universal on teh old free BBs alas.

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 16:42

Morning all. Thought I'd drop in here for a bit of a rest and to escape teh old idle chat.

[tsk 1] 10/12/2010 16:20

I wouldn't bare anything in this weather - it might fall off.

[2jinxed] 10/12/2010 16:17

If I told you the truth would you bare a grudge?

[mark30] 10/12/2010 14:57

you know the wife then ?

Time we all lightened up on here IMHO :0)

[2jinxed] 10/12/2010 14:24

1. pompous: Definition, Synonyms from Answers.com
pompous adj. Characterized by excessive self-esteem or exaggerated dignity; pretentious: pompous officials who enjoy giving orders.

[monte1] 10/12/2010 13:53

2J

What happens on teh PBB stays in teh PBB.

[2jinxed] 10/12/2010 13:50

I can't say I understand why one would pay for a premium BB and yet, spend more time on a free one than all the posters put together.

Does the premium site discuss enrt? and if so how is that going?

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 13:26

potem - 10 Dec'10 - 13:09 - 1533 of 1533
No point in arguing about what is so easy to check

Indeed it is potem, old chap, and it proves that you've made some baseless allegations. (It's also interesting that someone who criticises others for having nothing better to do, himself has nothing better to do than trawl through months of old posts only to get his facts and his conclusions so breathtakingly wrong).

For people who continually claim to want to keep the thread on topic, you and your cohort hardly 'reck your own rede' !

[potem] 10/12/2010 13:09

In the unlikely event that anyone wants to follow the posted dealings of Bluebelle it takes less than 5 minutes to check his posts from
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bluebelle - 19 Jul'10 - 13:06 - 584 of 1532

"Is this weakness a buying opportunity for this old friend?"

Er...No. Ed.
---------------------------------------------------------------
to
Bluebelle - 17 Sep'10 - 09:32 - 836 of 1532

SB closed this morning.
-------------------------------------------------------------
No point in arguing about what is so easy to check

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 13:01

times104 - 10 Dec'10 - 12:57 - 1531 of 1531

Next time you're thinking of criticising someone for posting something irrelevant and off-topic, re-read 1531 before you do.

[times104] 10/12/2010 12:57

Well well well...Bluebelle out collecting for Oxfam or similar....RATTLE....RATTLE......RATTLE................................

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 12:32

potem - 10 Dec'10 - 12:13 - 1529 of 1529
I know nothing about your holdings apart from what you have posted. You say you posted details. I reposted those details.

There you go again. Oh no you didn't. That has nothing to do with my HOLDING. That post referred to a one off, opportunistic spread bet on which I could, correctly as it turned out, see little downside.


On the face of it those who closed spreadbets on the 17th September got it spectacularly wrong.

Well, again, that just shows how little you know. I posted that I had closed it - shortly after I did so note, not months afterwards with the benefit of hindsight. Could I have made more had I let it run ? Yes, of course , I could but we can all be wise after the event (and in many cases claim we were wise before it). I had a specific, quite modest, low risk objective. Having achieved it, I closed. Simple as that. No over claiming. No waiting until September 23 rd and claiming to have sold at the top. Just as I told you I sold at circa 142 not 190 first time round. Unusual, I know, on BBs such as this, but correct.

[potem] 10/12/2010 12:13

I know nothing about your holdings apart from what you have posted. You say you posted details. I reposted those details.

On the face of it those who closed spreadbets on the 17th September got it spectacularly wrong.

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 11:50

It may surprise you to know that I don't keep a record of my posts nor have I any particular interest in proving you, or anyone else, wrong. What I post about my buys and sells - and there have only ever been 3 of them excluding SBs - is factually correct. Whether or not you choose to believe that is entirely up to you but irrelevant to me. It would be better however if you and your cohort stopped publishing blatant lies - on the basis of absolutely no evidence whatsoever - in relation to my holdings, and indeed, various other things, which you publish as fact but which you are in no position to know about and which, in many recent cases, you have spectacularly wrong.

[potem] 10/12/2010 11:39

Blue : when did you buy then? You could always prove me wrong with the post number.

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 11:36

Morning Hampster.

[teh hampster] 10/12/2010 11:32

Morning Blue.

[bluebelle] 10/12/2010 11:31

Morning monte.

potem - 9 Dec'10 - 23:53 - 1513 of 1522

I may be wrong, but there does not seem to be any other post of Bluebelle's which refers to actual purchases or sales at the time they were made (without editing, that is!). The share price seems to have been consistently above 2p since the 17 sept so it is difficult to see when he bought his "significant holding" below 2p.


Leaving aside the fact that potem has been scrolling back through my posts - how sad is that - he is now quoting them, selectively - to imply that I am misrepresenting the situation. Not so.

"I may be wrong".

Not may, dear old potem. You are. Spectacularly so. Now, please, no more of this misrepresentation either from you or from your co-misrepresenter, hardly a perfect choice of companion if I may say so.

[monte1] 10/12/2010 11:12

Are 'we'?

"At the end of the day we are all in hee to make money. We are all in ENRT board so I assume we are all invested in ENRT or are thinking of investing in the company."