Environ.Recycle Share Discussion Threads

[2jinxed] 02/12/2010 17:39

Have to say am very surprised at their new web site showing 8x4 boards and they call it pim, I did speak with Nick some time back, but, he is not bothered about the letters sent on or behalf on ENRT..

Surely this needs nipping in the bud!!

[ron atkinson] 02/12/2010 16:11

So much idle chatter, im afraid I had to 'recent'.

Poor Hammy.

[potem] 02/12/2010 16:10

Bless!

edit : Good bit of late editing above.

[bluebelle] 02/12/2010 16:06

garth - 2 Dec'10 - 15:13 - 267 of 268
Bluebelle - thank you for the balanced response in 249. Interesting. There was a sense a few years back that they would take over the world....


garth

No problem....just a shame that there are some delusional idiots on this thread who, not satisfied with being incapable of giving a constructive and helpful response to a straightforward request themselves, take it amiss when I do ! Sad really : now we'll no doubt get some pathetic post from potem.

[tsk 1] 02/12/2010 15:16

I suppose there is an answer for everything...

[garth] 02/12/2010 15:13

Bluebelle - thank you for the balanced response in 249. Interesting. There was a sense a few years back that they would take over the world....

[tsk 1] 02/12/2010 15:01

Why do italics always slope from lower left to upper right?

[potem] 02/12/2010 14:48

M : I know. (Fishing should get boring when the fish bites every time, but I just can't resist it.......)

[mirandaj] 02/12/2010 14:42

potem - 2 Dec'10 - 14:17 - 263 of 263


OK, I give up. I admit it. You genuinely are that naive.


I disagree potem. He is not naive. He is a bore so I have filtered his posts now. He just likes to hear the sound of his own keyboard and to stifle others' comments.

[potem] 02/12/2010 14:17

OK, I give up. I admit it. You genuinely are that naive.

[bluebelle] 02/12/2010 14:10

potem - 2 Dec'10 - 13:01 - 260 of 261
"Why do you try to pretend that a post by a new poster packed with leading questions aimed at your (and some others) favourite topics is a "perfectly reasonable request".

Backtracking now, eh potem ? Because you realise what an error you have made. For the record, I did no such thing and have no connection with that poster, nor with any other : I have only ever posted under this soubriquet. garth's post was, to me, a perfectly reasonable one and I answered the points he made in good faith. Only to you would such actions be regarded as in any way suspicious. (If you doubt it, e-mail advfn and ask them to investigate. Then post your request and their reply on this thread).

Interesting that you and your little gang have the time to post comments about my reply, but none of you - including phoenixs - have the time, knowledge or courtesy to post a reply to a, yes, reasonable request, from another poster.

"readers of your posts should be wary of your motives"
I'm sure that readers can arrive at their own view on such subjects. Only you, however, subscribes to the potem conspiracy theory.

"I have had other things to sort out in my life and cannot devote my full attention to this bb"

I'm sure you have. They appear to me to need urgent attention. Interesting isn't it that you criticise other posters for spending time on a bb, which is entirely their own choice. YOU can then can find the time to post unnecessary, critical posts, but CANNOT find the time - or have the expertise - to respond to the reasonable request, yes reasonable request, of another poster.

Typical.




phoenixs - 2 Dec'10 - 13:02 - 261 of 261
more "idle chat" from bluebelle I see.

In that case,phoenixs, I suggest you get your eyes tested. You, on the other hand, apparently have nothing but idle chat to offer. I suggest you re-read your post and ask yourself - given your previous statements - what on earth was the point of posting it. You might also care to respond to garth's post : but no, that would be too constructive for you.

[phoenixs] 02/12/2010 13:02

more "idle chat" from bluebelle I see.

[bluebelle] 02/12/2010 12:44

Oh dear. Just as I thought. Dear old potem can't even explain HIS OWN posts. Yet he criticises others - some would say indulges in idle chat - for responding constructively to another poster's reasonable request for information.

[times104] 02/12/2010 12:43

Ah! there is the rub.
DEMANDING an answer to his question YET still refuses to answer my perfectly sound reasonable enquiry previously made.
Bluebelle answer my previous well documented question, IF YOU DARE!!!!!!!!!!

[bluebelle] 02/12/2010 12:26

Explain that potem, you idle chatterer. What EXACTLY do you mean?

EDIT :

Come on potem. I'm waiting. None of that sneaking off behind the bike sheds which you're so keen of accusing others of doing. What EXACTLY do you mean?

EDIT EDIT :

Are you there potem ? I'm STILL waiting. You're having problems with this one aren't you. Because you now realise you've got it BADLY wrong. Simple question. What EXACTLY do you mean?

[potem] 02/12/2010 12:22

"a perfectly reasonable request from garth" : Lol!

[2jinxed] 02/12/2010 12:10

Have a nice day and watch some P.... spoil it, typical typical..

[bluebelle] 02/12/2010 12:03

2Jinxed - 2 Dec'10 - 11:57 - 1292 of 1293
good to see blue again.

Nice of you to say so 2J.

Morning Ron.

[ron atkinson] 02/12/2010 11:58

Oh dear, first idle chat and now ramping.

TEH HAMPSTER!

[2jinxed] 02/12/2010 11:57

If one is getting a little board pardon the pun, one may like to look at eua it has great potential imo and are merely waiting for their licence, dyor please. good to see blue again.

[bluebelle] 02/12/2010 11:57

jack horner - 2 Dec'10 - 11:45 - 253 of 254
I do smile whilst sipping coffee at some of the "posting spats"
you entertain on this thread from time to time.

Ye, it's all a bit of a laugh isn't it. Some people just take life too seriously and often miss the important bits because of it. May your lights sparkle - I'm sure you'll end up getting them anyway !!!

[bluebelle] 02/12/2010 11:52

Well anyone talking to himself would have a damned sight more sensible a conversation than he would have by talking to idle chatters of the likes of potem and perfect choice.

Typical. Absolutely NOTHING constructive to say in response to a perfectly reasonable request from garth but happy to make pathetic 'behind the bicycle sheds', as dear old potem would no doubt say, comments when someone does. What do you disagree with ? What's your response to garth ? Nothing. That would be too much to ask. Respond positively and constructively when someone asks for information? No. Not your style at all.

I don't know why you bother when there is already an idle chat thread. You are the sort of people who ruin constructive discussion on threads like this, which was set up specifically to promote it.

[jack horner] 02/12/2010 11:45

Blue belle, I agree you never have delivered bad advice!
I do smile whilst sipping coffee at some of the "posting spats"
you entertain on this thread from time to time.

I do see this share price moving progressively beyond 6-7p pre Christmas.
That's when to buy the sparkly lights you advised on.

[2jinxed] 02/12/2010 11:42

scroll down to bottom click on website I assume this is not pim, but, do appear to encapsulate.