
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enteq Technologies Plc | LSE:NTQ | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B41Q8Q68 | ORD 1P |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | O | 0 | 0.4875 | GBX |
Date | Time | Source | Headline |
---|---|---|---|
02/6/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | AIM Cancellation - Enteq Technologies Plc |
30/4/2025 | 18:00 | UK RNS | FTSE Russell Enteq Technologies |
30/4/2025 | 07:30 | UK RNS | AIM Suspension - Enteq Technologies plc |
30/4/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Enteq Technologies PLC Appointment of Administrators |
25/4/2025 | 21:39 | ALNC | ![]() |
25/4/2025 | 10:27 | UK RNS | Enteq Technologies PLC Conclusion of FSP, Corporate & Sale Process Update |
25/4/2025 | 08:26 | UK RNS | Cavendish Securities PLC Form 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) |
24/4/2025 | 09:35 | UK RNS | Cavendish Securities PLC Form 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) - Enteq Technologies PLC |
22/4/2025 | 09:31 | UK RNS | Cavendish Securities PLC Form 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) |
10/4/2025 | 09:43 | UK RNS | Cavendish Securities PLC Form 8.5 (EPT/NON-RI) |
Enteq Technologies (NTQ) Share Charts1 Year Enteq Technologies Chart |
|
1 Month Enteq Technologies Chart |
Intraday Enteq Technologies Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
06/5/2025 | 15:05 | Enteq Upstream plc | 2,416 |
15/9/2015 | 07:14 | *** Enteq Upstream *** | 2 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 25/4/2025 23:06 by brugen I bought this company about 10 years ago when the cash in bank was greater than the share price. Since then I've seen my (paper) profit treble then disappear. The management personnel and the strategy have changed over the years but I've held on. I've no doubt that all of the changes have been aimed at enhancing profitability. The only person to blame for my loss is me. A lot of people from engineers to cleaners have worked hard to make this company a success. Unfortunatley they failed. Creative destruction at its best. |
Posted at 25/4/2025 18:27 by 1gw As far as I can see they started life on AIM back in 2011 with £15m and raised another £42m when they bought XXT in 2012.So (at least) £57m raised (best part of $100m at the then-exchange rate) and now all gone it would appear, with nothing of material value to show for it. The SABER product they've touted as a game-changer still appears not to be viewed as commercially valuable by third parties, judging from this formal sale process. That third party verdict contrasts rather sharply with all the positive noises made by NTQ itself about the potential of and interest in the product. It all looked a lot more promising in September 2019, when they expected to have a commercial system ready to go within 2 years. "Enteq envisages that the development of a commercial system will take up to a further two years and may require a total investment of up to approximately $3m over that period, including some initial payments to Shell. Additional expenditure for the subsequent build of trial and commercial inventory would be required and royalty payments will be due to Shell when commercial." and "The Enteq team has a track record in commercialising innovative engineering projects which have achieved good market share." At the time they had around $11m cash so it didn't seem like the company-wrecker it has apparently turned out to be. |
Posted at 25/4/2025 10:32 by stonks394 Totally dire. Out of cash in 3 weeksThe Company has a cash balance of $0.602m as at 25th April 2025 which gives an expected cash runway until mid-May, based on current management forecasts. Enteq will therefore need further funding however if at any time it is considered by the Board that suitable funding cannot realistically be raised then the Board will take the appropriate steps to seek to preserve value for creditors. |
Posted at 11/4/2025 10:16 by optimist4now An update would be good, but the 3 month deafening silence on the sale issue is not unexpected!p1nkfish - I accept that Law has plenty of skin in the game and industry experience, but NTQ is his first CEO post and his profile does not seem to suggest he has any background in product innovation and development. |
Posted at 27/1/2025 16:07 by p1nkfish Interesting, GNEISS Energy are working on behalf of NTQ for the sale and are now a holder at 1.4%.Good to have them on the register as they align well now to maximise return - if there is any. |
Posted at 20/1/2025 20:17 by 1gw It just needs a bit of competition. If one company can be persuaded to bid then that's something, but if 2 companies want it then who knows where it might finish?A lot will depend on how convincing the test results in the dataroom are in terms of the likely ultimate effectiveness of SABER. Is it largely the lack of financial strength of NTQ that has been holding it back or is there still material doubt over whether it will ever work properly and cost-effectively? |
Posted at 20/1/2025 17:59 by p1nkfish BELOW IS AN EXPERIMENT, NOT TO BE RELIED UPON.Having followed ENTEQ for a while I took the liberty to put all details into a friendly AI - warts and all - including adding in delays to product release. I do think SABER will hit the market and make a difference. Put in low ball IP valuation. burn-rate, USPs etc etc. The kitchen sink. Not just good stuff. Long story short, potential sales price per share even at the low end of the results it gave back, are above todays price. Multiple scenarios. Worse case scenario was still very interesting. Conclusion: Current Value: $0.21–$0.42/sh Post-Revenue Success: Potential to reach $0.26–$0.52/sh Strategic Acquisition: If the technology proves disruptive, larger firms (e.g., Halliburton) may acquire at a premium to secure the IP, potentially increasing valuation to $50–70M ($0.48–$0.67/s Risks: Testing delays, inability to penetrate the market, or further cash burn leading to equity dilution. Sounds like BS but there was logic to the response it gave. |
Posted at 20/1/2025 07:15 by 1gw Formal sale process provides a bit of excitement before they go. Interesting to see how the share price reacts this morning - does anyone believe they might achieve a decent outcome?They're trying not to do a Thelma & Louise, so just have to hope they haven't left it too late before applying the brakes... |
Posted at 30/10/2024 08:45 by optimist4now Plus ça change.All we get is how great the market is going to be for SABER and that it is a "natural fit" for the future! I echo ValueHurts comment - at least update us as to when the $100k relating to the Australia testing, which started in May (?), has been earned. The only thing that NTQ has actually achieved this year is the halving of the share price. |
Posted at 17/9/2024 13:43 by sturmey My shares have been in the "bottom drawer" since November 2013 when I bought a fair chunk at over 50p. The IPO price was 100p and well-subscribed by serious institutional investors. At 50p, I thought I was getting a bargain. What a deluded fool I was!Aggressive "buying on weakness" over the years has left me with a substantial holding at an average price of 22p. We clearly need good news on SABER. Additionally, it would help if some of the gunslinging punters got on board and set a rocket under the share price |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions