Empyrean Energy Share Discussion Threads

[tidy 2] 17/10/2017 16:50

Last trade 24p

[thegreatgeraldo] 17/10/2017 16:34

Being a bit thick here, but what does it matter where the kitchen is? It's closed down now!

[starzerus] 17/10/2017 16:27

TGG - the thought is that they did not migrate there from 100's of miles away but DID originate locally - if that is proved then the sky is the limit!!

[crosseyed] 17/10/2017 16:17

bluehooperman,

I also have had dean.etc filtered for a long time, probably not even through EME, and indeed, anybody who posts that much as we see today must surely have some ulterior motive, though being filtered I have no idea what that might be.

I would also point out that I cannot ban a blue poster even if I wished to. Though again, I think the thread would be rapidly cleared of malevolent posters if genuine posters simply filter such riffraff and/or never respond to them. Of course, the filter option would encompass both ends.

My approach is to give posters whom I regard as malevolent about three chances before filtering them. It rapidly becomes clear from others' responses whether or not I made the right decision.

And once again, I implore posters to refrain from profanities however much I understand their provocations.

c

[michaelhfrancis] 17/10/2017 15:55

What if as was suggested by a few on here recently that the lowest zone sits right above the kitchen where all the gas was cooked is their a possibility that when this zone starts to produce that the kitchen will continue to feed this bottom zone if this is a possibility its no wonder that management when interviewed can not help smiling at the camera. Experts opinion on the above appreciated

[michaelhfrancis] 17/10/2017 15:55

What if as was suggested by a few on here recently that the lowest zone sits right above the kitchen where all the gas was cooked is their a possibility that when this zone starts to produce that the kitchen will continue to feed this bottom zone if this is a possibility its no wonder that management when interviewed can not help smiling at the camera. Experts opinion on the above appreciated

[terry hardacre] 17/10/2017 15:54

Lol, sorry TG, only just noticed the vid with the noise turned on - yep, she's mine alright, she's the shy, retiring, member of the tribe ?

[stewart4700] 17/10/2017 15:54

dean,

Actually 14 x 3.33 is 46.6p Steve Larrett tweeted 45p I think, that would do me.

[bluehooperman] 17/10/2017 15:53

I know I can use the filter button crosseyed, but DRH is ruining this thread, he's been filtered for a long time by myselfHave a look on VOG B.B. !!!!

[deanroberthunt] 17/10/2017 15:49

I rounded up :) to the nearest ten

[thegreatgeraldo] 17/10/2017 15:48

Maths not your strong point though....

"14 * 3.33 = 50p"

[deanroberthunt] 17/10/2017 15:43

I reckon it'll be nearer 2tcf

[deanroberthunt] 17/10/2017 15:43

14 * 3.33 = 50p

[stewart4700] 17/10/2017 15:42

Thanks all for that,

mark of the rushes.

Got it so 30% 0f the gross 300bcf, or net 90bcf, if its 1tcf then 3.33 times or 45p a share to eme. I was thrown by the 14p per share but now follow.
cheers

[seagreen] 17/10/2017 15:25

Deano just pulling your leg you were being a tad in your face.....8-)

[mark of the rushes] 17/10/2017 15:23

Stewart, that 300bcf they're talking about is gross and just a "what if" scenario so only 90bcf to eme. If it were net(so a tcf gross) then we are talking 57p to eme as per TK's valuation.

[deanroberthunt] 17/10/2017 15:19

is that you being restorative...

[thegreatgeraldo] 17/10/2017 15:17

Rhymes with blunt, as in not very sharp at all. ;-#)))

[seagreen] 17/10/2017 15:14

I presume that is hunt with an h and not a typo