ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

DEC Diversified Energy Company Plc

1,269.00
-21.00 (-1.63%)
Last Updated: 12:04:25
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Diversified Energy Company Plc LSE:DEC London Ordinary Share GB00BQHP5P93 ORD 20P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -21.00 -1.63% 1,269.00 1,266.00 1,270.00 1,281.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 44,738 12:04:25
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 868.26M 758.02M 15.9479 0.79 613.15M
Diversified Energy Company Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker DEC. The last closing price for Diversified Energy was 1,290p. Over the last year, Diversified Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 822.50p to 1,930.00p.

Diversified Energy currently has 47,530,929 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Diversified Energy is £613.15 million. Diversified Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 0.79.

Diversified Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1676 to 1700 of 10750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  63  62  61  60  59  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
25/10/2021
08:12
Gas price on the rise again . 5.541 +0.261 +4.94%
lab305
21/10/2021
20:36
Prof, the Bloomberg article was an attack on my pension and savings account, though I am not sure where 'cosy' comes in. As investors we have been doing our best to turn that attack to advantage, happily with a good deal of success so far.
1knocker
21/10/2021
12:28
I would expect short term future price to fall but the longer term ones to remain steady for the time being. Reason being short ones have been spiking and are volatile but longer ones are reflecting what may be the future norm which will only suffer price wise if there is a dramatic drop in the short term.
scrwal
21/10/2021
09:44
I use this as a source of futures information


It appears to have different figures.

I also have tradingview figures of spot at 5.56 and next contract as 5.419

Whichever way these are high, but not even close to the peaks of the past. I have not tried to convert between the global LNG price or the European or UK gas prices as they don't impact DEC.

Today's Bloomberg article seems a waste of pixels.

johnhemming
21/10/2021
09:28
If you keep buying bunches of neglected wells, won't average emissions have to rise to begin with, until you can assess and fix or plug them?

Shorter contracts are coming down but the longer ones are holding up:

Nov 21

free stock charts from uk.advfn.com


Nov 23

free stock charts from uk.advfn.com

aleman
21/10/2021
09:18
Post 1643. I read the article. DEC is the whipping boy, for story continuity, but it is more of an indictment of the inaccuracy of estimates, which is a worldwide problem, of emissions and the effects of those emissions.
Note, also, that if DEC were not the owner, the inventory count, and errors, would not have happened. However, the leaks would have been the same, but just hiding under the carpet of ignorance.

hashertu
21/10/2021
09:11
I read it once, I read it again - pathetic and absurd - Woke, snowflake, immature, agenda-driven "journalism"

Market seems to be ignoring it also judging by the share price reaction

Cue our resident troll......

adg
20/10/2021
23:58
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-20/gas-producer-diversified-energy-said-emissions-fell-now-it-says-they-didn-tPants on fire
croasdalelfc
20/10/2021
17:04
Chunky UTs on the buy side for a while but this week the UTs seem to be sells. Good to be around the mid teens now after the silly dip to mid 90's last week.I can still see this testing 52 week highs before CM day.
sunbed44
20/10/2021
16:01
Don't blame me , the greater of 40% FCF or $26 MM in dividends is disclosed as a major assumption in the wind down model.
scrwal
20/10/2021
13:26
I thought it was '...at least 40%...'?
cassini
20/10/2021
13:08
I don't really understand why the 40% has to be a maximum figure over time. One would expect there to be a sum payable for retirement and a sum payable for debt and the rest of the cash is then available for the shareholders and/or further investment.

What would matter to other parties (the public as a whole and the banks) is that the company fulfils its liabilities. After that it is up to the company.

johnhemming
20/10/2021
13:02
The ARO Wind Down Model will need modifying as they are paying well over 40% of FCF as dividends but a major assumption is 40% Max.
Obviously current prices and acquisitions will change things but they need to be careful to make sure the dividends remain under control.
If they intend to move the pay rate higher then they should state the revised figure rather than disclosing the 40% which has been there for several years.
It's a bit pedantic but one of those things that if you freely disclose the info make sure it's correct or in the right ballpark.

scrwal
20/10/2021
12:29
If you are doing to do a lot of well plugging it is worth having an in house team. They have estimated a total of USD1.7bn for well plugging for the earlier tranches of wells.

I don't think there is an ulterior motive for the Bloomberg article. I just don't think they understand the issues properly.

johnhemming
20/10/2021
11:37
Gary1966,

Thanks for this. I stand corrected (& surprised)

mondex
20/10/2021
11:27
mondex,

From the interim results on 5/8:

Improved emissions monitoring and reporting through significant progress on data warehouse and asset inventory

-- Established an internal team dedicated to permanently retiring wells, reducing reliance on third-party services and driving further process quality and efficiencies

Permanently retired 14 wells in West Virginia at an average cost per well of $19 thousand, 25% below typical third-party costs

-- Permanently retired 65 wells in Appalachia at an average cost of $19 thousand per well

gary1966
20/10/2021
11:26
Sogoesit

Capital destruction as from the investors' point of view - not the underlying assets.

I would have thought that didn't need to be made explicit.

professor john koestler
20/10/2021
11:24
Croasdalelfc, if you look at DEC's website under Smarter Asset Management, they give the following as their modus operandi:

"Smarter Asset Management in Practice

Because many of the assets we acquire were non-core to the seller’s portfolios, these assets often provide DGO with a variety of SAM optimization opportunities to improve or restore production from the wells via low-cost techniques. . Our large and diverse portfolio of assets affords us thousands of opportunities to deploy these techniques – techniques that have a proven track record of maintaining consistent production across our wells. SAM activities can generate favorable environmental impacts in a number of manners, including:


Lowering unchecked emissions and improving safety through continuous financial and manpower investment in the mechanical integrity of our operational equipment.

Eliminating unchecked methane emissions via proactive pipeline surveillance.

Reducing miles driven by our field operations team due to our geographic scale and well density.

Reducing water disposal costs with innovative mater management practices.

Reducing well visits and miles driven by installing monitoring and measurement equipment.

Lowering emissions by reducing inefficient operational compression due to scale and synergistic opportunities.

For more information on our Smarter Assett Management program, please visit our Sustainability Report"

As you can see, they try & limit site visits by the use of monitoring & measuring equipment.

On a related note, I very much doubt DEC do their own plugging & abandoning of wells. This sort of work is usually contracted out. It's regarded as too expensive to retain crews & equipment & it's really only NOC's who keep this facility in-house.

mondex
20/10/2021
11:15
"I think there is a likely chance capital destruction is going on here." (post #1593)

Well, at least the good Professor has cottoned on to the well known underlying investment case for a wasting asset is, indeed, capital destruction!

Well played sir ;-)

sogoesit
20/10/2021
11:07
I don't think Bloomberg Green are there to compete with brokers and analysts. They came out with a news story that the public has the right to know about. I suggest some of you grow-up a little and stop taking it as a personal attack on your cosy little pensions and savings accounts. ;)
professor john koestler
20/10/2021
10:58
PJK I did not accuse you of shorting and I acknowledge that your newly arrived boundless negatively must spring from pure altruism. I still maintain that the depth of knowledge exhibited by the broker research far outweighs the sensationalism of the Blomberg journalists. It is obvious from your fawning over them that you are far from a reasoned observer.
lab305
20/10/2021
10:28
lab305

Never shorted in my life, and neither have most here. Those who think they are shorting are spread-betting that the share price will fall - completely different thing. The spread betting companies generally don't trade the underlying stock unless they find themselves with large betting asymmetry which doesn't happen often because they have other tools to limit/stop this from happening.

Apart from the odd exception, the real shorters - whose pockets are deep because they are loaning stock from pension houses and other institutions - would mount a more serious negative offence than what you find on ADVFN. They employ a smorgasbord of good accountants who can generally tear a set of accounts to pieces better than any singular person on ADVFN is likely to do. Trust me, the share price wouldn't be dilly-dallying around like it is if they were on-board.

professor john koestler
20/10/2021
09:50
Croasdale - have you factored in that a sizeable fraction of their wells could be on multiwell sites..... ;-)


lab305 - yes, as the hatchet job was delivered while I was on holiday, it's taken quite a while to wade through 300 or so posts. Curious that many of the more negative ones were delivered by people with a very short posting history on ADVFN. It's almost as if there were a link.


The main point that flags Bloomberg's article as not a shock-horror exposee on a "dirty" industry is that it only targets DEC. If you consider slide 4 of the recent Cotton Valley presentation, there are 16 operators there, all interwoven in a patchwork quilt of wells and licences, some dividend payers, some private. I'm sure a similar patchwork would be found in the NE states too. It's a leap of the imagination to suggest that none of these competitors' wells emits any gas, or that they all have billions of cash set aside for capping old wells.

spangle93
20/10/2021
09:25
(Bloomberg) --Banks are gradually offering more credit to U.S. shale oil and natural gas producers as the industry recovers from last year’s contraction and energy prices rally.

So-called borrowing bases will increase as much as 20% during the imminent round of talks between drillers and lenders, according to most respondents in a survey conducted by law firm Haynes & Boone LLP.

The findings indicate a continued improvement after the dire conditions experienced in the oil and gas sector last year, when the pandemic and global gluts led to a slump in energy prices and prompted banks to cut back on lending.

The previous Haynes & Boone survey, published in April, indicated borrowing bases would remain flat or rise by 10%. Lending against crude and gas reserves, a key source of capital for explorers, typically sees twice-year retederminations, in which bankers reassess their commitments.

mondex
20/10/2021
09:16
Farrugia .Their initial reception was much warmer in the UK and they found a number of institutions here that were willing to back them. The US favours larger companies and so as they are so much bigger now they may benefit from a US listing. The company is debating this at the moment. Ironically the move to the main market here was done partly at least to counter an earlier semi journalistic attack by making the company more open to scrutiny and demonstrating that it was following all the rules. Also at the same time new higher profile auditors were appointed again to demonstrate the company was being run properly.
lab305
Chat Pages: Latest  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  63  62  61  60  59  Older