We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daniel Stewart | LSE:DAN | London | Ordinary Share | GB0004602842 | ORD 0.25P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.625 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
03/3/2016 09:13 | As I indicated, the price for closing has been revised downwards. If anyone wants to sell their DAN shares at 0.4p, please get your broker to contact Ken at Cambell O'Connor (tel 00 353 (1) 679 1969. Non-negotiable on price as that is the level that others are trading at, sorry. WShak Disclosure: I have a small short open that I am looking in the process of closing. | wshak | |
25/2/2016 11:07 | IOnlyPostAfterBBMs, I did post it - it was immediately removed. I don't know why - DAN is now delisted so I wouldn't have thought that stock exchange rules apply. new article from TW, incidentally: They look bust to me, so I won't be offering 0.7p after today. | wshak | |
25/2/2016 10:56 | They raised £1.2m @ 3.35p only last June. Sheep to be shorn. WShak, You should post that info on the LSE DAN threads. Lots of underwater holders there keen to get out. | ionlypostafterbbms | |
25/2/2016 10:48 | If anyone wants to sell their DAN shares at 0.7p, please get your broker to contact Ken at Cambell O'Connor (tel 00 353 (1) 679 1969. Non-negotiable on price as that is the level that others are trading at, sorry. WShak Disclosure: I have a small short open that I am looking in the process of closing. | wshak | |
03/2/2016 22:47 | No question RT is a total crook. The biggest red flag EVER. | stud-muffin | |
24/1/2016 22:33 | Good post Nod. It is also not known what happened to the proceeds from the QPP warrants. The SFO need to get involved with O'Shea. | lr4850 | |
24/1/2016 21:08 | For those who know DAN and Adam Wilson ...It's interesting to note that Atlantic Coal cancelled its AIM listing on 21 January. Adam Wilson is a major shareholder and Chairman of ATC. The cancellation followed a suspension which left private shareholders with no means to sell their shares. For those who don't know DAN very well, Adam Wilson was a director of DAN. He quit so DAN could buy a business he owned in the Middle East named MENA. Peter Shea paid Wilson nearly one million pounds for MENA and it proved to be a worthless business which Shea quickly shut down. Shea then paid Wilson 500,000 pounds a year in consultant fees at the same time as DANs revenues were falling like a stone and loss making. Wilson brought minimal revenue into DAN.Shea and Wilson jointly own a pub-restaurant in England.DAN was a major investor in QPP by way of warrants. DAN was the original nomad bringing QPP to AIM. RT has known Peter Shea and DANs directors for many years. I have never held a share in QPP and have no interest in RT. I have regularly expressed my opinion that DANs directors and shareholders were corrupt. | nod | |
22/1/2016 21:50 | Bibs, Post 8154, originally on LSE, was entered into TW's Bulletin Board Moron of the Week competition on January 20th. | ionlypostafterbbms | |
22/1/2016 21:36 | You are wierd. You try selling your shares in this now, you will find it very difficult without a market place. How are you going to find the buyer? I think you are in denial, and I dont mean the river in Egypt | lydnem | |
22/1/2016 21:34 | Back track and learn your lesson! | bibs | |
22/1/2016 21:16 | Definite naive mug punter! | lydnem | |
22/1/2016 21:12 | Pay your money, take your chance. | bibs | |
22/1/2016 21:08 | Yes, but some with cash they can afford to loose, although I personally doubt they will! | bibs | |
22/1/2016 21:05 | If anyone thinks having no quote at all is better than an aim quote (as bad as that may be) they are stupid | lydnem | |
22/1/2016 21:03 | i look at mug punters as those who have limited investment knowledge, that gamble on very risky shares without understanding what they are buying. | lydnem | |
22/1/2016 20:53 | Lydnem, please elaborate on your definition of 'mug punter' and I shall gladly respond. | bibs | |
22/1/2016 20:37 | No wisdom is being displayed there. Only idiots blame shorters for the demise of a company. I think you come under the category of "mug punter" | lydnem | |
22/1/2016 20:15 | Funny isn't it?Shorters really do not like it when pearls of wisdom appear when they least expect it.Where have all the negative comments gone? | bibs | |
22/1/2016 19:54 | Not on AIM, but you can sell and buy too, if you choose to. | bibs | |
22/1/2016 19:39 | Lse post: indigopot Some positives 1.625 BuyI suspect that the delisting here could, in a perverse way, actually be good for this share. I understand that this share was being shorted whilst it was trading on AIM and that was probably a significant cause of the decline in the price here from 4p+ to 1.7p. Indeed, Rob Terry wrote in his blog that one of the key reasons that he wanted the share to come off AIM was to avoid the shorting. Around mid-2015, he stated with a high degree of confidence that the fair value of DAN was 4p 4.5p having done research into the firm and having had constructive meetings with management and, as per the RNS on 15 January, the company's prospects are strengthening significantly with a growing pipeline, new areas of strength and new clients. The company raised new funds at 3.35p and Rob Terry sold some of his investment recently at 3.35p off market. If people are happy to pay 3.35p when the shares are trading at 1.7p this clearly suggests significant value. Whilst he has sold most of his stake in IMTK, he is increasing his stake as much as possible off market, recently upping his stake twice. RT is no fool and everything here seems to point to significant future price rises, especially given that he stated that DAN would move into profit in 2016 and comfortably be valued at 4-4.5p on normal market metrics. Being off market should also allow M&A to proceed more quickly. Being off-market could also lead to this share moving towards fair value more quickly, whilst the shorters will probably want to close out. I would guess that without the shorters this would probably now be around say 3p or so and may even have returned to 4p+. After M&A and a relisting RT suggested that 10p is fair value. When trading opens again (not sure when that would be) it would not be a surprise if this rose to say 2p to 3p. If I could buy any in that range when it is trading again I would think that would probably be pretty good value, with a target of say 10p in two years. Just my thoughts. | bibs | |
22/1/2016 19:31 | V8 vantage you may well have, but only if you are invested.Mug punters, let's see who has the last laugh?Life is full of too many clowns who's glass is either half full or who are of 'limited intelligence'.Only time will tell which way this will play out. | bibs | |
22/1/2016 16:13 | Why do you think RT has bought an additional 30 million shares in Dan in the last few wees. Just possibly because he think's there's some positive developments in store..? | v8vantage | |
22/1/2016 11:55 | Mug punters never learn. Only a few will be turned off. Look what he did to innovation and qpp, yet the morons still followed him, and some still cant see the hundreds of millions of write downs were down to him. | lydnem |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions