![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condor Gold Plc | LSE:CNR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8225591 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.05 | -0.21% | 24.20 | 24.00 | 24.50 | 24.25 | 24.00 | 24.25 | 97,147 | 16:35:12 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 0 | -1.69M | -0.0083 | -29.22 | 49.33M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/2/2016 11:30 | Pog -2.19% | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 11:08 | Goneawol is biting his nails. Keep away from those cheesy feet lol | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 11:00 | Goneawol crying over further losses lol3mths is a set Nicaraguan timescale. Yet again MC failing to manage circumstances | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 10:49 | usmcgs 18 Feb'16 - 17:53 - 13936 of 13966 A week and a bit to PDAC if people expect news ---------------- usmcgs 22 Feb'16 - 10:29 - 13966 of 13966 PDAC still over 2 weeks away. -------------------- PDAC in less than two weeks, hth. | ![]() goneawol | |
22/2/2016 10:29 | PDAC still over 2 weeks away. Don't believe the rampers with regards Nicaraguan government being there so news automatically coming. They have been to other presentations together | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 10:16 | Looks like the market is saying exactly what it thinks of cnr | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 09:56 | pog -1.97% | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 09:53 | MC/CNR and Nic government ares supposed to be close but timescales have always been lousy. At a time like this you would expect a lot more guidance and accuracy on timescales | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 09:45 | Red. This is what you get with no leadership guidance on time scales, wishy washy on sale/jv, placing due etc etc | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 08:27 | Quoted below spread to sell 32.25 ouch | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 08:25 | pog -1.94% | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 08:02 | Seems the 3mths were set by nic. government | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 07:58 | Where macday? Damn phone | usmcgs | |
22/2/2016 07:57 | Pog down and rampers running for the hillsWhere's macdatarecovery? | usmcgs | |
20/2/2016 23:25 | Seems that the rampers have gone quiet on all the Lse bbs Too busy selling | usmcgs | |
19/2/2016 16:53 | Goldman Sachs can't spell. What hope have they got of calling the movement of gold ! Fulfil. | ![]() psolomons | |
19/2/2016 15:36 | Now the 10k seller returns | usmcgs | |
19/2/2016 15:35 | The smell of LSE desperation | usmcgs | |
19/2/2016 15:32 | This is what you get when MC gives no timescale | usmcgs | |
19/2/2016 15:19 | Don't believe the rampers ref pdac the share price tell all | usmcgs | |
19/2/2016 15:05 | We have a 14k seller | usmcgs | |
19/2/2016 13:40 | Goldman Sachs analysts just published this on gold, chart driven using Elliot Wave, but thought it would be of interest. ------- The rally since December 3rd continues to look like an incomplete 4 of 5-waves higher. This means there’s likely going to be at least one more move higher to fulfill the setup. Near-term support seems fairly strong between 1,192 and 1,185 (includes 38.2% retrace of the entire Dec./Feb. rise). This entire wave count stands within the A leg of an ABC counter-trend rise. Over time, should have potential to reach as far as 1,381-1,392. This longer-term target includes 38.2% retrace of the ‘11/’15 decline as well as the target from a declining wedge that developed off the Mar. ’14 high. | ![]() andy | |
19/2/2016 13:07 | 888icb, No, the legitimate price, IMO, was a 3 or 6 month average price, and that was certainly not $1,250, or anything like it! They have been lucky that international tensions and doubts about future US interest rate rises have come along so quickly to increase the POG. They used $1,250 to make the numbers look better than they would have been at $1,100, and it worked, people fell for it. As Tem rightly points out the fuel cost used was $100,whereas it's around $30 now, so that would have reduced costs. It's a spreadsheet model, and not difficult to calculate using current oil an gold prices! | ![]() andy | |
19/2/2016 11:25 | On lse we have desperate punter who knows nothing. Public consultation hasn't even taken place yet and cambells, who is always a bright spark (not) who stated permits another day closer lol | usmcgs |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions