ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

CHL Cloudified Holdings Limited

7.00
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 11:37:12
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Cloudified Holdings Limited LSE:CHL London Ordinary Share VGG3338A1158 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 7.00 6.00 8.00 7.80 6.50 7.00 85,109 11:37:12
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Business Services, Nec 4.57M 1.49M 0.2821 0.25 368.5k
Cloudified Holdings Limited is listed in the Business Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker CHL. The last closing price for Cloudified was 7p. Over the last year, Cloudified shares have traded in a share price range of 3.75p to 12.50p.

Cloudified currently has 5,264,212 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Cloudified is £368,495 . Cloudified has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 0.25.

Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

Showing 70451 to 70474 of 70750 messages
Chat Pages: 2830  2829  2828  2827  2826  2825  2824  2823  2822  2821  2820  2819  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
25/4/2019
00:23
Jack,


Yes please share any response here as soon as you receive it.

andy
24/4/2019
22:05
If they do pull something out of the bag, it won’t be for us poor mugs!
fregate
24/4/2019
18:58
I guess the administrators will be in no rush.
sesame03
24/4/2019
18:34
Highly likely we have lost our investment here. However, we are still waiting for the final word from the company. If it's a simple game-over situation, then why the delay in providing the announcement? In my mind there remains a grain of hope, albeit a small one.
bdog51
24/4/2019
16:31
Wake up Stephen We have lost all our investment here End of
nico115
24/4/2019
16:21
Maybe ROI are planning a £1.8 billion pound payment to Churchill, as a gesture of goodwill, eh Stephen? No admission of liability, though. They're just happy that they won, paying the money has never been an issue for them.
thailand
24/4/2019
16:09
Lol

Stephen suddenly appearing again like a magician with a tall tale and a sprinkle of mystery and alchemy

jnbrw
24/4/2019
15:07
Stephen,
Have you or any other posters managed to have a conversation with DQ since the decision?
This must have landed as a crushing blow to him, and to Nicholas Smith, I wonder how they are dealing with the fallout from this unmitigated disaster?

sperac
24/4/2019
14:54
Has it not occurred to anyone that the delay may be due to the possibility that C.C. may have discovered something that could change everything??

I wonder...…R30;…...is it just possible

rutter
24/4/2019
14:31
Everywhere on whichever thread you happen to look, nothing but, uneducated bile. The other thread author trying to sound like a philosopher whilst behaving like a mob leader and allowing scum to post unmoderated nonsense.

D.Q. being vilified at this stage is disgusting and beneath contempt.

Has it not occurred to anyone that the delay may be due to the possibility that C.C. may have discovered something that could change everything??

Any challenge in the Paris court would be time consuming, certainly not expensive. The best protection for Churchill is administration and prevents ROI bringing bankruptcy proceedings against CHL that would finish us all and leave no back door, to enable CHL to bring further appeal. No haircut is possible now, we are in administration, Pala would either fund the small cost or lose $billions, if no funder was available or in fact, needed.

The delay is unfortunate, but if it delivers, i can wait. D.Q. has done what he said he would, protect shareholders interests, in this most distressing case.

stephen1946
24/4/2019
12:59
Well done Jack.It doesn't need us all to email the administrators.Perhaps the first person with a reply back could update the BB here?Cheers
wulber
24/4/2019
11:34
neo

I did that today.

jack1236
24/4/2019
11:19
If anyone gets a reply could they post here please
wulber
24/4/2019
11:04
we can probably contact the administrators now, restructuring.london.core@rsmuk.com
neo26
24/4/2019
10:01
Same time scale put on GCM RESOURCES regarding government approval on 28th Feb still waiting.
bobic
24/4/2019
09:32
Still no news posted on CHL's website.


Why do they state 7 days and then fail to meet the target they themselves set?


Better not to put a timescale at all than fail to meet one surely?

andy
23/4/2019
14:55
Lets just see what the next news brings rather than speculate.Yes maybe it is all over, but maybe a OXS repeat if they can get funding and CC see a case in a different jurisdiction.
wulber
23/4/2019
14:37
imho, nothing wrong with that at all, im just saying it is going to be very difficult for chl now, its evident some political issues went on behind close doors judging by the icsid decision(s).

Will cc recommend taking this further?

We all need to realise this maybe the end, rather know now then waste more years hoping justice prevails.

neo26
23/4/2019
14:27
neo,


DQ hasn't "moved on", he was already involved with another company, and I don't see a problem with that, do you?


CHL has been e legal battle for the last couple of years, so not difficult for him to have involvement elsewhere, IMO.

andy
23/4/2019
12:44
Well 7 days or 14 days, chl not listed no more, DQ moved on.Looking very difficult, well and truly shafted, I just wished I never heard of chl.
neo26
23/4/2019
12:05
Wulber,


I always thought it would take longer than 7 days.


Firstly CC have to assess the decision and if they think there is any merit in fighting on. And if so, where? E.G Paris.


And if there is, I would expect CHL to approach PALA to assess their willingness or not to finance any further actions, and then they have to sit down as a board and make a decision based on all that.


Following that, they have to draft an RNS, and get legals to pass it.


I would expect that to take a bit of time personally, 7 days was only realistic if they were throwing in the towel, IMO.

andy
23/4/2019
11:34
Anyone heard any news re: RNS - notification in 7 days?
wulber
22/4/2019
20:26
Jack,


Yes it would be interesting to see if it's happened before.


It does seem as though ICSID rules don't apply to CHL's case at all.

andy
20/4/2019
19:47
JNBRW very well analysed the whole saga of Roi and ICSID. Let's wait the final outcome. ATB
bobic
Chat Pages: 2830  2829  2828  2827  2826  2825  2824  2823  2822  2821  2820  2819  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock