![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloudified Holdings Limited | LSE:CHL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG3338A1158 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.25 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Services, Nec | 3.79M | -2.55M | -0.4844 | -0.43 | 118.44k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
03/8/2015 21:55 | July 30, 2015 The Claimants file a request for the exclusion of evidence. August 2, 2015 The parties conduct a document inspection in Singapore. Could be many reasons no point in negative speculation Could be a request concerning 00C settlement ie if you keep that out of court we will pay you X amount. This kind of speculation is just as absurd and ridiculous and there is no point taking that on board. | ![]() debbiegee | |
03/8/2015 21:55 | Is there only one document to inspect? Probably more than one so I don't think conclusions can be drawn. | ![]() weegeordie | |
03/8/2015 21:40 | Have been out so apologies for the delay in replying. The fact that they have had a document inspection suggests they lost the argument otherwise the document would have been excluded on the first date.As I say, only speculation. | ![]() daddy warbucks | |
03/8/2015 19:19 | DW - why do you say Churchill may well have lost that argument (visited the link but could find no details) | ![]() baxter99 | |
03/8/2015 17:31 | Thanks for the above.Just speculation, but maybe the ROI were trying to bring something in late which Churchill objected to. With a document inspection, looks like Churchill may well have lost that argument. | ![]() daddy warbucks | |
03/8/2015 17:20 | July 30, 2015 The Claimants file a request for the exclusion of evidence. August 2, 2015 The parties conduct a document inspection in Singapore. hxxps://icsid.worldb | ![]() mrshaungcm | |
03/8/2015 17:17 | hxxp://thejakartaglo Jakarta. The government will revise a 2014 regulation on minerals and coal mining to provide legal certainty for ongoing investments in the sector, a minister said over the weekend. Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Sudirman Said said that a 2014 decree (No. 77) stipulates that mining contracts are allowed to propose permit extension — two years before the contracts expire at the soonest or six months before they expire at the latest . He said the government would revise the aforementioned clause to provide business certainty for investors. The ministry is currently studying the regulation. “The two-years contract extension proposal does not make any sense considering the huge investment [involved]. It needs to be reviewed,” he told reporters in Jakarta. Sudirman claimed that the revision is not only meant for Freeport Indonesia, a local unit of US mining giant Freeport McMoRan. The revision, he stressed, is to guarantee the investment certainty in the minerals and coals sectors generally. He added that the planned revision is also based on a 2015 presidential decree on a policy of natural resources management for the betterment of the Papuan economy. The revision will follow the path of the presidential decree headed by the National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas) and the minerals and coal team at the Energy Ministry. Meanwhile, the director general of minerals and coals at that ministry, Bambang Gatot, said there were several options in determining the limit of permit extension. One of the options, he said, is by considering the number of investments. “Is it normal if [a company] with big investments must propose the extension two years before the contract expires?” he said. Similar to Sudirman, Bambang denied that the revision was related to Freeport’s permit extension. “We want to revise the regulation not only for one company, not to entertain Freeport but to give an impact to all mining companies,” he said. | ![]() mrshaungcm | |
03/8/2015 16:18 | Well whatever happens this week willl determine our fate after all this time. | ![]() debbiegee | |
03/8/2015 14:25 | Where's Bad Smell today? Sorry Robot. | ![]() timnicebutdim | |
03/8/2015 13:52 | better than a flat SP | ![]() cool hand kev | |
03/8/2015 13:15 | Now now. Don't get too excited! ;0) | ![]() daddy warbucks | |
03/8/2015 13:09 | Pumped up Knockers with oxygen sounds ok to me :-) | ![]() tburns | |
03/8/2015 12:53 | I think most holders know the story. Adding anything else just gives oxygen to the knockers. | ![]() daddy warbucks | |
03/8/2015 12:20 | Correct.Correct.No. | ![]() daddy warbucks | |
03/8/2015 10:52 | Opening arguments for both parties will have been completed now as Singers is 7 Hours+. A splurge of buys anytime this week bodes well. | ![]() tburns | |
03/8/2015 09:46 | I did say spies outside the court fidra :-) | ![]() debbiegee | |
03/8/2015 09:18 | Yes but we have said if the Indos see they are losing the best thing they can do is buy shares. Theres also the tea boy bar attendent next door taxi drivers etc etc ....... | ![]() debbiegee | |
03/8/2015 09:09 | there are no members of the public admitted as far as I am aware. | ![]() fidra | |
03/8/2015 09:09 | Schedule 8. The hearing shall take place from 3 to 8 August 2015 and on 10 August from noon on, 9 August being a day off and the morning of 10 August being reserved time. 9. The hearing shall commence at 9:00 and proceed until 17:00, subject to any adjustment required by the course of the examinations, with a one hour lunch break and at least two coffee breaks. 10. Subject to paragraph 23 below, the general schedule for the hearing is set as follows: Day 1 (3 August): opening statements Day 2 (4 August): expert examination (if necessary, the hearing may last beyond 17:00 that day) Days 3-6 (5-7 and 8 August if needed): witness examination | ![]() debbiegee | |
03/8/2015 08:48 | we should have spies outside the court to see which team come out back slapping looking satisfied and smug and which team come out argueing amongst themselves. LOL ! ! ! :-)))))))))))))))))) The day of witness statements[grilling] should be quiet good for observers outside the court hahahaha ! Negative signs may include :mopping their brow, ,pooing their pants,coming out in a different suit profuse sweating ,cardiac arrest, burnt ears or fainting !!! | ![]() debbiegee |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions