We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloudified Holdings Limited | LSE:CHL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG3338A1158 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 5.00 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 5.55 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 08:00:12 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Services, Nec | 4.57M | 1.49M | 0.2821 | 0.18 | 263.21k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
28/11/2016 10:15 | Yes Orb (debs) you are right it's totally irrelevant, that is why the ROI expensive legal team are utilising it as their main defense? This is the level of depravity and lies here, you are mentally ill!!!! Please explain exactly what you mean by "it would mean that an International Tribunal judging on 'jurisdiction eligibility' might have taken this into consideration when making the judgement?" here's a heads up debs, post on some other thread with your fake names it' a bit obvious when every one of these names only ever post on chl thread! | evil_doctor_facilier | |
28/11/2016 10:14 | Looks like another case of panicking Peeps to sell on small sales by dropping the Offer & Buy together | tburns | |
28/11/2016 10:07 | Welshwiz,Good to hear. Aren't we all :) I was fully out of Oxus before it went pop, more through luck than judgement, so I have cautiously dipped my toe in here.Regards IHNC | ihavenoclue | |
28/11/2016 09:59 | He did the same in June with this red text, best to filter now... | neo26 | |
28/11/2016 09:47 | Re the Law of foreign Investment,Regulatio I would have thought that if the above was relevant in this case it would mean that an International Tribunal judging on 'jurisdiction eligibility' might have taken this into consideration when making the judgement? | theorb | |
28/11/2016 09:47 | Thanks Debbie | tburns | |
28/11/2016 09:21 | It was a buy as the stock momentarily dropped and mm came back up on the bid so thought a late buy was gonna be announced | debbiegee | |
28/11/2016 09:19 | Difficult to say if that 25k trade at 8:07 is a buy or sell | tburns | |
28/11/2016 09:08 | Ihnc, Not too bad. Looking for a good result here to make my life that bit easier :-) | welshwiz | |
28/11/2016 09:05 | maybe there was a typo and it was 2 yrs and not 2 weeks | mrshaungcm | |
28/11/2016 08:59 | sportbilly1976 28 Nov '16 - 08:43 - 11325 of 11327 1 0 Very surprised no rns this morning, was thinking today fitted into the two week timeframe perfectly. ==================== People taking an arbitration timetable as set in stone which it isn't ... they will take their own sweet time. Even if it is within the timescale the 3 day notice will come through the day and not ready for the start of the stock market. The arbitration panel would not care about keeping shareholders waiting. Regards IHNC | ihavenoclue | |
28/11/2016 08:45 | Hi Welshwiz, Long time no chat .... How's life treating you ? ;) Best Regards IHNC | ihavenoclue | |
28/11/2016 08:43 | ireminisces 25 Nov '16 - 14:27 - 11268 of 11324 0 0 Delays are possible but I think we have had our fair share. An early sign would be look out for the trades by family and friends of the decision makers icid. ==================== 1) How could you tell ? 2) It's called Insider Trading and would stand out like a sore thumb. | ihavenoclue | |
28/11/2016 08:43 | Very surprised no rns this morning, was thinking today fitted into the two week timeframe perfectly. I guess we either get one during the day or tomorrow. I'm expecting immediate suspension pending release of a decision. | sportbilly1976 | |
28/11/2016 08:27 | The lying matron is fonsidering re-hab, go for it chuck they can cure liars and deceitful posters. | stephen1946 | |
28/11/2016 08:17 | I might take a week off if its going crazy. Who do we listen to DQ or other posters ? | debbiegee | |
28/11/2016 08:10 | Yeh Debs is right, it' all about forged documents!!!!!!!!!!! The scary thing is some people actually believe that! In advfn bb land, if you lie enough times unchallenged , it becomes 'fact' Regulations state that mining permits can only be acquired by Indonesian citizens or legal entities that have its majority shares owned by Indonesian citizens.According to the ROI .... "Churchill's acquired Ridlatama illegally because the acquisition puts a domestic mining company in foreign hands. The law of foreign investment governs that foreign investors can only set cooperation agreements in mining sectors with the government of the Republic of Indonesia". | evil_doctor_facilier | |
28/11/2016 08:09 | Dont be so harsh on yourself Martym | keya5000 | |
28/11/2016 08:03 | Drip dripndrip | martym | |
28/11/2016 07:57 | This article here clearly blows the outright lies out of the water that the ROI only defence is forgery. For some time i have been informing posters that it's land use and forgery is just an offshoot attempt to derail the process. Obviously, it's a lie the whole case is about about forgeryand this myth is being peddled by debs and her names . As you can see, forgery is actually down on the list of defense being used and it's actually below land use and illegal logging. Is it of any concern the article below sets out the ROI law? well it shows the lack of knowledge on foreign ownership posted by all debs names yesterday on here. The ROI only have to win over ONE panel member to get this thrown out! I repeat only gamble what you can afford to lose , do not be sucked in by the criminal ramper! TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - East Kutai Regent Isran Noor is confident that the Indonesian government will win in the lawsuit against Churchill Mining, which challenges the revocation of its mining license in 2010. Isran believed that revoking Ridlatama Group's mining permit was appropriate since the company has violated a number of regulations, including illegal mining activities in forest area without for permits at the Forest Ministry. Ridlatama Group is a domestic company where Churchill Mining invests its money. In addition, the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) found that the company had forged former East Kalimantan Governor Awang Farouk’s signature in several documents. Regulations state that mining permits can only be acquired by Indonesian citizens or legal entities that have its majority shares owned by Indonesian citizens. According to Isran, Churchill's acquired Ridlatama illegally because the acquisition puts a domestic mining company in foreign hands. The law of foreign investment governs that foreign investors can only set cooperation agreements in mining sectors with the government of the Republic of Indonesia. | evil_doctor_facilier | |
28/11/2016 07:26 | Yes the 'red tick' man was correct. | debbie_does_dallas_twice | |
28/11/2016 07:11 | Anyone else thinking of going to the AGM? | pb01 | |
28/11/2016 07:07 | How v strange | patviera | |
28/11/2016 01:11 | In the Forgery Dismissal Application, Indonesia's main contentions were as follows: · The Ridlatama licences were never the property of either Ridlatama or Churchill; · The areas of land covered by the Ridlatama licences were at all times the property of companies within the Nusantara Group; · Ridlatama forged the licences for General Survey and Exploration (and related approvals and recommendations) as part of a "massive, systematic and sophisticated scheme to defraud the Republic"; · Ridlatama used its forged general survey and exploration licences to "trick" the Regent of East Kutai into signing and issuing the exploitation licences for the EKCP; · By its conduct Ridlatama stole from the Nusantara Group property; and · Churchill and Planet's claims should be dismissed because they arise out of measures allegedly taken by Indonesia against investments that themselves depend entirely on the rights conveyed by the Ridlatama licences. ==================== How many have of the points have roi proved, Noor evidence was thrown out, Roi gave no evidence of Nusantara holding license at time ridlatama did. I think this case is a farce, i cant see how roi can win this particular phase... | neo26 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions