Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 12:44

online limits anybody ?

[pembury] 21/8/2015 11:06

Thanks.

27p

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 11:02

I thonk it only said " Early next month."
Have not seen any further news

[pembury] 21/8/2015 10:50

Anyone got the date when ROI government representatives arrive in London next month for trade talks?

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 10:26

no
I just searched for last month and nothing,would you not have thought if that was the last straw they were clutching to that by now they would have been at least bought in for interrogation and/or offices searched if not actually accused ?

I of the POs or RNSs mentioned that Ridlatama staff , former director or CEO [I think] spoke as OUR WITNESS in the tribunal./hearing

[daddy warbucks] 21/8/2015 10:17

You mean the state police didn't call when the tribunal was on or threaten the staff? And they haven't had any suspicious fires at their offices?

[daddy warbucks] 21/8/2015 10:05

I wondered if that was a bed and ISA trade?

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 10:02

LOOKS LIKE 5OK EACH WAY LATE REPORTED

[daddy warbucks] 21/8/2015 10:01

TomI think Baxter answered it for me. I did qualify my post by saying IF the rumours are true and news COULD come at anytime, not will come.Just in case you are not aware, when Churchill won the argument for the ICSID to have jurisdiction of the case, the shares were temporarily suspended, before the announcement and shot up to an intraday high of 80p.

[tom111] 21/8/2015 09:33

What rumours DADDY if any strong rumours were heard this would fly,fact is its well down again

[daddy warbucks] 21/8/2015 09:24

If these rumours of OOC settlement are correct, they have been going on for over ten weeks.News could come at any time and maybe MM's want to be ready when the news comes.It won't be 80p like last year!

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 09:22

OFTEN WHEN SPREAD ONLY HALF A POINT IS THE TURNING TIME,BUT NOT ALWAYS

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 09:21

It means at least 1 mm happy to pay 29 but dont know how many he wants [no L2]

[baxter99] 21/8/2015 09:21

I noticed that too - don't recollect ever seeing CHL with spread of less than 1%

[daddy warbucks] 21/8/2015 09:14

The spread has really tightened. Do the MM's not want to sell under 29p?

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 08:29

Think Iscid just helping to layer the facts and possible sticking points ?

As we know the ISCID seems to be a farce as apparently ROI want to settle but we are dealing with arrogant obstinate hardnuts so perhaps the guidance is useful ?

[theunluckyone] 21/8/2015 08:29

debbiegee - Strongly agree that our last set of lawyers screw up cost us far more than it should have.Lets face it the ROI has done virtually everything to the ICSID judges apart from give them the one fingered salute and they could have come down on them like the proverbial ton of bricks if it was not for the unfortunate actions - or rather inactions - of our last legal team.I can only think that the ICSID,in view of the fact that there is no appeal allowed against their decision,is trying to get a unanimous verdict from the judges rather than a majority decision.This means,of course persuading the Indonesian's choice of judge to vote against their "employer" and to this achieve this goal are giving the ROI every chance of backing up their claims.

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 08:12

Maybe was just a case of presenting all the evidence and now sifting through and need some clarification.
I remebember how our previous lawyers screwed up and hope that our new layers dont miss any tricks.

[weegeordie] 21/8/2015 08:07

Yes - that is a possibility - giving them a bit more time to sort things out?
WG

[pembury] 21/8/2015 07:54

Perhaps if they know ooc is in process they have no need to be forming opinions? Agree seems strange otherwise.

[daddy warbucks] 21/8/2015 07:43

It's almost like they are saying, "go and sort it out yourselves".And how much does the tribunal judges get paid each day?

[debbiegee] 21/8/2015 07:41

LOOKS LIKE OUR LAWYERS WILL PLAY A MAJOR ROLE

[weegeordie] 21/8/2015 07:30

Not sure what is going on here with this tribunal - I thought they were to make a decision based on the evidence submitted over the week of the document hearing - instead they seem to be asking each party what they think the decisions should be.
Most odd imo.
WG