Chariot Share Discussion Threads

[navyan] 26/1/2010 20:50

thank u Sir.

[andonis] 26/1/2010 20:15

good chart ideas nav...

[navyan] 26/1/2010 11:55

bought some SBUL as well.

[navyan] 26/1/2010 09:54

free stock charts from www.advfn.com

[navyan] 26/1/2010 08:35

not happy?

u mean the red line or the pink lines? propably pink lines I guess.

[andonis] 26/1/2010 07:07

could be although not happy about the lines you drew there.

[jamesiebabie] 25/1/2010 19:36

Nav,

Is your target 53 for SSIL?

[andonis] 25/1/2010 19:07

Hi Nav, Hope it works out.. Markets should bounce a little for now... we will see Have not studied tomorrows yet.

[navyan] 25/1/2010 15:20

Bought some SSIL.

[tpaulbeaumont] 25/1/2010 15:17

You've no need to worry about me Ando, I'll still chime in if I see something I think may be of use :)

[andonis] 25/1/2010 07:03

oh! tears in me eyes! I will now give you your dummy to suck. You are making so much money that you come here to c my loosing trendlines. Oghhhhhh so moving. The difference is I produce charts and you cannot READ them . Your advise is such fun when you say 3rd wave must be the largest.... You are such a comedian.But I tell you what. I will keep you employed in my kitchen as my TEA BOY. You can bring me my coffee and tea newspaper and read my charts for free....my chart trendlines I mean. Mind you from what I hear in the grapevine not sure what kind of trendlines you like.

[tpaulbeaumont] 25/1/2010 06:45

Ah but I do produce work Ando, and unlike most, I make my sole income from following it, so it has to be of practical use :) And as for saying 'thank you'(you do crack me up which is appreciated lol), Ive tried to go a step further, by offering pointers and advice to you over many years, which, curiously, you dismiss with 'lol', or are simply rude, and march on using the same questionable ways. Its a very odd response.

I saw a post of yours a while back that said 'I love geometry...i love charts' and thats fine. I like geometry and charts too, which is why I look in here, because - as mentioned above - theres occasions you have interesting trendlines :)

'In the land of the blind the one-eyed man i king' Theres clearly a market for money-losing analysis, as subscription websites can atest.

Whats glaringly obvious about your reams of charts Ando is that if anyone were to try and bet actual money on financial markets based on the implications of your graphs, they'd lose. The flawed use of wave theory is'nt the only reason.



In summary you really couldnt even pay me enough to trial your software, even if you had any; if I wanted to lose money, I could bet on horses :)

[andonis] 25/1/2010 06:19

tpaul,..........MTG, nav and I will make a special price for you for my software.

[andonis] 25/1/2010 06:13

oh dear I have lost a customer. In other words, I come here cause I eat for free but I wish you give me for free much more. I am the expert who tastes wine and spit it if I dont like the taste, but I do not say thank you. tpaul you will remember me by the 5th wave extension examples that I have posted and will be posting here for you to learn. You have demonstrated zero knowledge to anybody as you have posted zero charts. Most certainly you have demonstrated nothing of your own, but you post other peoples good work that your peanut brain can consume. People who work, and publish their work do make mistakes. Worse they have to face parasitic readers like you. Those who produce nothing criticize those who offer them for free, themselves they kill their boredom by gossiping other people but themselves are perfect they have made no mistakes since their produce is zero. They are parasites they eat from the healthy tree. After a while they feel the tree ows them free food. Someone sometime will have to make them work or expose them for what they are and treat them appropriately.

[tpaulbeaumont] 25/1/2010 02:45

occasionally theres some interesting trendlines, although the majority seem to be retro-fit and of very tenuous significance, hence the sheer volume of charts with wildly varying implications.

[tpaulbeaumont] 25/1/2010 02:43

Nav - lol easy question :P firstly Id never buy any wave software; all Ive seen(GET etc) is largely inaccurate. Doing ones own analysis well always remain of far greater practical use(assuming a good prior knowledge of course). Secondly, Ando has demonstrated his struggle with wave theory throughout the course of this thread. His continual mantra of '5th wave extention' is one notable oddity, but theres also many basic errors. Hes still a long way from having a practical handle on it; much like 90% of EW websites/blogs online.
So no :)

[andonis] 24/1/2010 22:48

KNOWLEDGE AND HALF KNOWLEDGE
Four frogs sat upon a log that lay floating on the edge of a river. Suddenly the log was caught by the current and swept slowly down the stream. The frogs were delighted and absorbed, for never before had they sailed. At length the first frog spoke, and said, "This is indeed a most marvellous log. It moves as if alive. No such log was ever known before." Then the second frog spoke, and said, "Nay, my friend, the log is like other logs, and does not move. It is the river that is walking to the sea, and carries us and the log with it." And the third frog spoke, and said, "It is neither the log nor the river that moves. The moving is in our thinking. For without thought nothing moves." And the three frogs began to wrangle about what was really moving. The quarrel grew hotter and louder, but they could not agree. Then they turned to the fourth frog, who up to this time had been listening attentively but holding his peace, and they asked his opinion. And the fourth frog said, "Each of you is right, and none of you is wrong. The moving is in the log and the water and our thinking also." And the three frogs became very angry, for none of them was willing to admit that his was not the whole truth, and that the other two were not wholly wrong. Then a strange thing happened. The three frogs got together and pushed the fourth frog off the log into the river.

...gibran...