Chariot Share Discussion Threads

[andonis] 12/2/2010 12:54

Lots of hard work nav good effort. Do you think it will flag fr a while or crash down..

[tpaulbeaumont] 12/2/2010 04:26

andonis - 11 Feb'10 - 16:33 - 2563 of 2568

Yes the link is poor info. As I said other peoples work. Do you ever do any work of your own tpaul? Apart from nagging on others people work and being a tea boy....;-)

What was other peoples work? I do all my own research if thats what you mean? If correcting others mistakes is nagging then I guess i do nag alot, a result of the number of mistakes I see I suppose :)

[andonis] 11/2/2010 21:24

yes this is much better we will see if it is ok

[navyan] 11/2/2010 20:27

Ando, I have been long, and collected some good points tonight.

wedge, look:

[andonis] 11/2/2010 20:04

good chart nav, but 10180 has a few gaps to close so perhaps it will try to close them. we will see I have not studied the markets since this morning as I was out all day.

[andonis] 11/2/2010 16:33

Yes the link is poor info. As I said other peoples work. Do you ever do any work of your own tpaul? Apart from nagging on others people work and being a tea boy....;-)

[tpaulbeaumont] 11/2/2010 15:21

theres an amusing link in the above post, sorry if it wasnt clear :) if anyone ever says theyve mastered an aspect of the markets, theyre heading for a fall ;) Ive mentioned my views before to you Nav.

[navyan] 11/2/2010 15:19

Tpaul, if you are so good at the EW theory, how come I have never seen you posted a EW chart here before?

[tpaulbeaumont] 11/2/2010 15:17

wave theory isnt that difficult

[tpaulbeaumont] 11/2/2010 14:47

i havent read the book 'far from random', it looks interesting though, might have a leaf through it.


andonis - 11 Feb'10 - 08:04 - 2552 of 2558

tpaul I backed my post on 3rd wave extension. Tell me what rule does it break? You are not using EW.

oh dear you must be confused, i didnt suggest it broke any rules? does it? i pointed out you have TWO sets of 'classic 3rd wave extension' wave labels, not ONE.... so its difficult to know what you were refering to.

[andonis] 11/2/2010 10:03

Enjoy trading. As i will not be online till the evening...

[andonis] 11/2/2010 09:14

Saw this, its not far from my office...lol

[navyan] 11/2/2010 08:15

yeah..erm.. no.

[andonis] 11/2/2010 08:13

tpaul tell us a bit about the book at least. For those who have not read it.

[navyan] 11/2/2010 08:11

haha.... Ando.

[andonis] 11/2/2010 08:04

tpaul I backed my post on 3rd wave extension. Tell me what rule does it break? You are not using EW.

[navyan] 11/2/2010 08:00

is it a good book? there is no description on the website, Tpaul.

[tpaulbeaumont] 11/2/2010 07:45

this looks interesting?

[navyan] 11/2/2010 07:31

lol Tpaul, thanks, will re-read ur thread.

[tpaulbeaumont] 11/2/2010 03:14

Nav - posts 2545 and 2546 both break 'rules' and are thus incorrect EW, can you see why? (answers on the EW trading thread, of course ;)
post 2541 is also unlikely as theres this little thing called 'alternation'(see EW trading thread), Ando likes ignoring this 'guideline' too, one of his many 'trademark' mistakes.

[tpaulbeaumont] 11/2/2010 03:10

andonis - 10 Feb'10 - 18:31 - 2535 of 2546

Hi tpaul, great to see you back watching us and controlling the quality ...
there are plenty of counts and fibs?...but only ONE 3rd wave extension.





no problem Ando, you know me, always try to help the misguided to use waves properly :)
"only ONE 3rd wave extension" eh? but you showed TWO on the graph?