Centurion Ele Share Discussion Threads

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 13:10

So, I guess you're claiming to work for the bank, then.
Why are you wasting time on this board? I think I'll move all my business away from HSBC if they employ people to sit about writing inane drivel on here all day.
Come to think of it, banks tend to employ people with decent qualifications - certainly at the level you seem to be claiming to work at (you've mentioned Canary Wharf a few times). Please note, I said "Seem to be claiming" because you never say anything straight, do you, you just like to intimate that you're important.

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 11:35

"25cent - 25 May'07 - 10:52 - 1033 of 1037

So looking at all my posts and all the facts,most of them unknown by anyone apart from inside the company/bank"

Answer the question then..
- If you work for the company, why are you trying to kill the share value and make yourself unemployed?
- If you work for the bank, why are you p!55ing about on this board..?

Or are you going to admit you're full of cr4p and are neither, but just like to infer that you're the man in the know and actually know nothing about CUC?

[25cent] 25/5/2007 11:04

Useless, i wonder is that better than being clueless? ;-)

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 11:03

OK, so if you work for the company, why are you trying to kill the share value and make yourself unemployed? (Unless, as I said before, you used to work there and have already been ousted because you were useless).

If you work for the bank, why are you p!55ing about on this board about an "ex client" when you should be doing some proper work with exisiting clients - or again, are you trying to make yourself unemployed?

I'm not trying to "get people to invest" - just trying to help those that may be thinking about it to make a decision. I've said several times, "I'm not saying 'BUY'" and my first post (interpretation of Audi RNS) had DYOR on it.

[25cent] 25/5/2007 11:02

LOL don't recall saying i was a guru that's your claim to shame.
The Q7 is a new Audi in China the A6(C6)is also an Audi for china.I think your strange proposition that in some way that's like a Vauxhall Corsa and a Ford Mondeo is baffling to us non experts lol?

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 10:56

"Just to make this absolutely clear clueless,your response to by post below is some ridiculous false proposition about a Vauxhall corsa right?"

No. You said the Audi S6 contract was no good 'cos it wasn't Q7. I said does that mean that a Mondeo contract would be "no good" 'cos it wasn't Opel Corsa? In other words - largely irrelevant.

(BTW, if you want people to think you're an automotive sector guru - don't refer to GME (General Motors - Europe) vehicles as Vauxhall - they're Opel to everyone within the industry)

[25cent] 25/5/2007 10:52

So looking at all my posts and all the facts,most of them unknown by anyone apart from inside the company/bank.What chance do you honestly think they have then clueless?
If you get just one person to invest in this by your explanation of RNS news of so called contract wins then you should be ashamed of yourself!

"although I note you go back and edit your posts so you don't look quite so stupid."
silly comments like that yet againmake you look desperate clueless!

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 10:49

"... clueless tried to rubbish my prediction of DVS going under, just like now on CUC."

I'll say this again very - slowly - this - time - so - you - can - understand.

I have not rubbished your "prediction" that they will go under. I have not made any opinion on this.
I have said the future depends whether they have enough cash flow - that's the million dollar question.

I ONLY commented on this RNS to shed light on it so people might like to try and buy at the bottom and make gains.

Anyone reading this is free to go back over previous posts and see exactly what I said - although I note you go back and edit your posts so you don't look quite so stupid.

[25cent] 25/5/2007 10:48

Just to make this absolutely clear clueless,your response to by post below is some ridiculous false proposition about a Vauxhall corsa right? LOL

1,LOL (laughing out loud ) at the long novel of spin about how great the contract is but the non disclosure yet again of financial details.
How long before the warning saying that the Audi a6 (c6) contract are significantly below its original forecasts.
Not seen that before on previous RNS announcements have we following previous all singing all dancing contract wins? Toyota (cough)


2, LOL (laughing out loud ) at the anticipated numbers involved in fitting these screens to one model(Audi C6) long wheel version of the A6 made for the China market.
What numbers are needed to even make it profitable at say 2.5 - 4.80% net?
In 2006 Audi China sold about 60,000 units of the old A6 in total.

3 LOL (laughing out loud ) at the volume and cash flow anticipated in fitting this one model, the A6 that is in essence a chauffeurs car ffs? The new Audi China4x4 Q7 is anticipated to take a huge slice of the A6 sales
The A6 was increasing sales year on year In China, but come on, this its hardly a money spinning contract is it?
That's why no financials are released yet again!


4, LOL (laughing out loud ) at the fact that this is for the Chinese version only (c6)and will not be fitted to any other (A6) cars apart from the ones made for China.
Why is it not being fitted into the new Audi China Q7? Who is fitting the screens to this new model?
It looks like a short term cheap option "spruce up" of the old A6(c6) model to help sales against the increasing competition whom Audi had a heads start on in China imo.

5. LOL (laughing out loud ) that the money, will not hit Cuc until Q2 2008
accounts.
Will CUC be still around then? you see the debt is around its neck now, not next year?

[25cent] 25/5/2007 10:39

Well that would be relevant if I posted on CFL quotes , but as I did not, I have to ask you yet again,what the hell are you talking about? lol
Oh btw clueless I will let you hang yourself a little longer before I let the rat out of the bag.
I have given a couple of clues along the way if you look back at my posts, probably the biggest one so far was the word insignificant.

[quotes_4_u] 25/5/2007 10:35

2 clueless !

Yes i filtered a lot of people on Dvs but these were stalker and nothing
to do with the stock, of course they got it right, by the way these same
people did exactly the same on Cfl at 3p, the stock went to 25p and is still
above 20p but of course you dont see them post on Cfl anymore !
So one stock loses 100% but others me and my friends have had have risen 300% and much more.

Yes Dvs was disaster, we were all conned but i have the odd cert of a company
that goes bust, you just move one but the stalkers cant do that, they have a
go at the posters but say nothing about the management who blatantly misled
and lost people a lot of money.

Sorry but no opinions on Cuc, keeping away from this sector after Dvs.

[25cent] 25/5/2007 10:33

Clueless you keep haveing a pop at the easy target lol your doing such a good job of it already I see.LOL
How desperate must you be for support when your lining up along side profile advfn nutters.

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 10:29

1 question, 25C, (asked already and never answered)

Have you ever made a posistive comment about any share on this board?

A simple yes / no and the epic code will do.

[25cent] 25/5/2007 10:26

Hello quotes fist time I have seen you since you completely disappeared off the DVS board on suspension.
You not unlike clueless tried to rubbish my prediction of DVS going under, just like now on CUC.
By the way where did you goto ? your the one that said i was so wrong and i even gave you the time span of suspension, silly boy!
Shall I repost some of your DVS posts quotes? ;-)

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 10:25

Hi Quotes,

I'm beginning to see this now.
To be honest, I used to see that you filtered people on the DVS board and I thought you were a bit closed-minded and not appreciative of other peoples' opinions (which they're entitled to). I didn't know all the history and I'm now realising that you probably did what was best.

All I tried to do - as I keep saying - was interpret this one RNS and he's just spiralled everything out of control.

I never said it was a great share with a bright future (as I keep repeating) all I did was interpret the RNS a bit for those who might like to try and predict a long-term, rising share. He pointys out the share price is low and there is little confidence from the city - well isn't that the point? Finding ones like this, reading between the lines and predicting those that will rise.

I may respond to him again (it lets me download a bit if I've had a sh*t day) and he's such an easy target as he clearly has very little idea what he's talking about! Quite fun at times, actually.

You got any thoughts on this share, Quotes?

2clu

[quotes_4_u] 25/5/2007 10:09

2clueless !


Dont go there mate !

25cent is a serial stalker, a complete nutter, i have a friend who
was plagued by this crazy person, i think you are now the "chosen one" !

You have to filter him please, he needs help, he thrives on the attention
you give him, just filter and ignore, he'll soon look elsewhere.

[25cent] 25/5/2007 09:02

Yep thought so littleman!

[2clueless] 25/5/2007 08:52

.... can't be bothered. idiot.

[2clueless] 24/5/2007 17:48

"How you can rubbish Mr. Powell yet again shows you have no understanding of this company"
No, I have no understanding of them at all - ROFLMAO again! If only you knew!!

[2clueless] 23/5/2007 19:52

Oh and my "Star Man" (you still can't read - I said I didn't think this) had to sell it - it was out of date when it was bought (by Powell) and was losing value every day.
Come on, hurry up - I'm not responding to you after today, I'm bored of it.